Re: Jodd/Madvoc MVC framework

2016-01-26 Thread Mike Guo
me of the struts2 plugins to >> support various result type implementations such as JSON and REST should be >> considered for merging into the struts2 core. These result types have >> become a major way to exchange data in the past several years with >> microservices, web ser

Re: Jodd/Madvoc MVC framework

2016-01-26 Thread Dave Newton
th > microservices, web services, and AJAX support that they should be first > class denizens in the codebase. > >> > >> Chris > >> > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Christoph Nenning [mailto:christoph.nenn...@lex-co

Re: Jodd/Madvoc MVC framework

2016-01-26 Thread Mike Guo
rs with >> microservices, web services, and AJAX support that they should be first >> class denizens in the codebase. >> >> Chris >> >> -Original Message----- >> From: Christoph Nenning [mailto:christoph.nenn...@lex-com.net] >> Sen

Re: Jodd/Madvoc MVC framework

2016-01-26 Thread Lukasz Lenart
services, > web services, and AJAX support that they should be first class denizens in > the codebase. > > Chris > > -Original Message- > From: Christoph Nenning [mailto:christoph.nenn...@lex-com.net] > Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2016 3:27 AM > To: Struts Users Mai

RE: Jodd/Madvoc MVC framework

2016-01-26 Thread CRANFORD, CHRIS
roservices, web services, and AJAX support that they should be first class denizens in the codebase. Chris -Original Message- From: Christoph Nenning [mailto:christoph.nenn...@lex-com.net] Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2016 3:27 AM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: Jodd/Madvoc MVC

RE: Jodd/Madvoc MVC framework

2016-01-26 Thread Martin Gainty
MySql (access: root/root!) and PostgreSQL (postgres/root!). Thanks Christoph! Martin > To: user@struts.apache.org > Subject: Re: Jodd/Madvoc MVC framework > From: christoph.nenn...@lex-com.net > Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 10:26:37 +0100 > > > I'm just not a fan of declaring thing

Re: Jodd/Madvoc MVC framework

2016-01-26 Thread Christoph Nenning
> I'm just not a fan of declaring things based on strings, including result > types. > > I don't know what the easiest/best answer is, probably I'll end up doing > nothing :( > Well, result type strings could be avoided with specialized classes, like return new InstantDispatcherResult("foo.jsp

RE: Jodd/Madvoc MVC framework

2016-01-26 Thread Christoph Nenning
ficate > > https://services.gradle.org/distributions/gradle-2.6-all.zip > > > > what is gradlew missing to download > > https\://services.gradle.org/distributions/gradle-2.6-all.zip > > ? > > Martin > > __ > > >

RE: Jodd/Madvoc MVC framework

2016-01-25 Thread Martin Gainty
@jodd.org > To: mgai...@hotmail.com > CC: user@struts.apache.org > Subject: Re: Jodd/Madvoc MVC framework > Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 19:11:38 +0100 > > Hi! > Can you check now? We moved to Gradle 2.10 yesterday, but obviously there > was a > left over from previous vers

Re: Jodd/Madvoc MVC framework

2016-01-25 Thread Igor Spasic
ificate https://services.gradle.org/distributions/gradle-2.6-all.zip what is gradlew missing to download https\://services.gradle.org/distributions/gradle-2.6-all.zip ? Martin __ > Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 10:32:45 -0500 > Subject: Re: Jodd/Madvoc MVC framewo

Re: Jodd/Madvoc MVC framework

2016-01-25 Thread Igor Spasic
ns/gradle-2.6-all.zip ? Martin __ > Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 10:32:45 -0500 > Subject: Re: Jodd/Madvoc MVC framework > From: davelnew...@gmail.com > To: user@struts.apache.org > > I'm just not a fan of declaring things based on string

Re: Jodd/Madvoc MVC framework

2016-01-25 Thread Igor Spasic
_ ------------ From: i...@jodd.org To: mgai...@hotmail.com CC: user@struts.apache.org Subject: Re: Jodd/Madvoc MVC framework Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 19:31:00 +0100 Ok, fixed :) Travis is working a

Re: Jodd/Madvoc MVC framework

2016-01-25 Thread Igor Spasic
.zip ? Martin __ > Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 10:32:45 -0500 > Subject: Re: Jodd/Madvoc MVC framework > From: davelnew...@gmail.com > To: user@struts.apache.org > > I'm just not a fan of declaring things based on strings, including result > types. > >

RE: Jodd/Madvoc MVC framework

2016-01-25 Thread Martin Gainty
From: i...@jodd.org To: mgai...@hotmail.com CC: user@struts.apache.org Subject: Re: Jodd/Madvoc MVC framework Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 19:31:00 +0100 Ok, fixed :) Travis is working again. The issue was

RE: Jodd/Madvoc MVC framework

2016-01-25 Thread Martin Gainty
-0500 > Subject: Re: Jodd/Madvoc MVC framework > From: davelnew...@gmail.com > To: user@struts.apache.org > > I'm just not a fan of declaring things based on strings, including result > types. > > I don't know what the easiest/best answer is, probably I'll end u

Re: Jodd/Madvoc MVC framework

2016-01-25 Thread Dave Newton
I'm just not a fan of declaring things based on strings, including result types. I don't know what the easiest/best answer is, probably I'll end up doing nothing :( On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Christoph Nenning < christoph.nenn...@lex-com.net> wrote: > > The async thing is nice; that would

Re: Jodd/Madvoc MVC framework

2016-01-25 Thread Christoph Nenning
> The async thing is nice; that would be a good thing to bring into S2. > > I still don't like the string-based action returns; strings are just awful. > I don't have a better solution (yet). > > It might be a good time for me to rethink the code-based config I'd > implemented some time ago, e.g

Re: Jodd/Madvoc MVC framework

2016-01-25 Thread Dave Newton
The async thing is nice; that would be a good thing to bring into S2. I still don't like the string-based action returns; strings are just awful. I don't have a better solution (yet). It might be a good time for me to rethink the code-based config I'd implemented some time ago, e.g., use a Groovy

Re: Jodd/Madvoc MVC framework

2016-01-25 Thread Christoph Nenning
> Hi folks, > > has anyone seen this before? > http://jodd.org/doc/madvoc/index.html > > Looks like they are taking basic Struts 2 concepts and mixing it with > some Spring MVC and Seam. > > It might be interesting to evaluate which of their concepts might be > nice to integrate in S2.5/3 - just

Jodd/Madvoc MVC framework

2016-01-22 Thread Rene Gielen
Hi folks, has anyone seen this before? http://jodd.org/doc/madvoc/index.html Looks like they are taking basic Struts 2 concepts and mixing it with some Spring MVC and Seam. It might be interesting to evaluate which of their concepts might be nice to integrate in S2.5/3 - just sayin' ... :) - Re