Given that there are no known problems with RC3, I'm starting a vote for
declaring RC3 the official XMLBeans 2.4.0 release. Files are still available at
this location: http://xmlbeans.apache.org/dist/
Everyone is welcome to vote but only votes from committers and PMC members are
binding. In
Hi,
Thanks for your swift response, I have constructed some FpML documents with
the FpMLDocument type but at the moment I am validating xml that will be
coming from external systems. I need to know if I should tell them they have
to use the tag with the xsi:type or if they can use the tag
as they
It doesn't exactly work like that. The xsi:type is there to assert its
an elements type, but it does not mean two elements are then
equivalent only that they should conform to the type defined by the
schema. The element names are the key here.
If you are using XMLBeans and you want your FpML docum
Hi,
I'm working with FpML and I'm not very knowledgeable about xml when it comes
to standards and what is allowed and was hoping if you guy could answer a
quick question I have.
I have a message as follows
...
Which fails validation because xmlbeans expects
...
Is the first instance valid co
4 matches
Mail list logo