Dears,
>From past three days, I have been facing issues with usage service in
CS4.3.1 with Xen host 6.2.0
In the CS mgmt server when check with usage service status, it is saying
running. But usage records are not generating in the cloud_usage
In the management-server.log I am getting below erro
Hi everyone,
We are 3 weeks away to CCC Dublin.
Many thanks to our sponsors:
-Citrix
-Cloud Foundry
-Nuage Networks
-Cloudian
-ShapeBlue
-Soldfire
-iKoula
-LPI-Japan
-PCextreme
I look forward to seeing you all there, don’t forget to register you still have
time.
Cheers,
-Sebastien
On 09/16/2015 11:46 AM, Anshul Gangwar wrote:
> It’s not difficult to find a good grace period. It will simply depend on your
> Hypervisor settings how it is configured for HA. You can easily figure out
> for how much time there will be no VM on any Host from your settings and
> simply put 2-3
I don’t think there was any discussion around this. Kelven have made fixes
around VMSync. So to find details look into FS
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/FS+-+VMSync+improvement .
Regards,
Anshul
On 16-Sep-2015, at 3:32 PM, Daan Hoogland
mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>>
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Anshul Gangwar
wrote:
> It’s not difficult to find a good grace period. It will simply depend on
> your Hypervisor settings how it is configured for HA. You can easily figure
> out for how much time there will be no VM on any Host from your settings
> and simply
It’s not difficult to find a good grace period. It will simply depend on your
Hypervisor settings how it is configured for HA. You can easily figure out for
how much time there will be no VM on any Host from your settings and simply put
2-3 times of that period as grace period.
It seems you hav
Hi René
On 09/16/2015 10:17 AM, Anshul Gangwar wrote:
> Currently we report only PowerOn VMs and do not report PowerOff VMs that's
> why we consider Missing and PowerOff as same And that's how most of the code
> is written for VM sync and each Hypervisor resource has same understanding.
> This
Please find my answers inline
Regards,
Anshul
On 16-Sep-2015, at 1:53 PM, Daan Hoogland
mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Anshul Gangwar
mailto:anshul.gang...@citrix.com>>
wrote:
Currently we report only PowerOn VMs and do not report PowerOff VMs that's
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Anshul Gangwar
wrote:
> Currently we report only PowerOn VMs and do not report PowerOff VMs that's
> why we consider Missing and PowerOff as same
This is not the behavior reported in the ticket. It is intermittend.
> And that's how most of the code is writte
Currently we report only PowerOn VMs and do not report PowerOff VMs that's why
we consider Missing and PowerOff as same And that's how most of the code is
written for VM sync and each Hypervisor resource has same understanding. This
will effect HA and many more unknown places. So please do not e
On 16-Sep-2015, at 1:06 pm, Daan Hoogland
mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
so two questions:
- is this a blocker?
A missing state handler is definitely a corner case, and IMO a blocker (so, for
both 4.6.0 and future 4.5.3).
- is the ignoring after logging the appropriate way to handle
Ladies and gentlemen,
A ticket was entered by Rene Moser [1] on the way ACS handles missing power
state reports. His issue is that VMs ma at times be regarded as off while
they are registered as running and actually running as well. The missing
report has to be handled in some way so right now it
12 matches
Mail list logo
