[libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java

Le 03/12/2016 à 07:33, Hylton Conacher (ZR1HPC) a écrit : > Wonder when LO is going to follow Minecraft's example for items such as > Base? > > Although, actually, there is still the ReportBuil

[libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java

Le 03/12/2016 à 07:33, Hylton Conacher (ZR1HPC) a écrit : > > Wonder when LO is going to follow Minecraft's example for items such as > Base? > When it no longer relies on a Java db engine as i

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java

Thank you Alex... more involved than I thought. No time for the next couple of days, but Base is sitting open and seemingly working so I'll do what I need then go looking for trouble :-) Now all I need to do is remember how to tell what bitness of LO I have! Cheers, K On 29/11/2016 14:29, Al

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java

Je la 29/11/2016 16:21, Dave skribis : Hi Alex, Is this an issue exclusive to the Mac edition? I am using the current version (5.2.3 x64) of Base on both 64bit Linux and Windows with JRE only and have not encountered any problem. Based on the mail headers of the previous posts in this thread, t

[libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java

Le 29/11/2016 à 16:21, Dave a écrit : Hi Dave, The MacOS problem is one of the issues, but there have also been reports of Base (5.2.x) not working correctly on Windows correctly with a JRE, hence my recommendation to switch to a JDK. If it still works for you with a 64bit JRE, then so much the b

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java

On 29.11.2016 15:29, Alexander Thurgood wrote: > Le 28/11/2016 à 23:05, Keith Barber a écrit : > > Hi Keith, > >> Thank you for this Alex. Not sure I'm computerate enough to know the >> difference between a JDK and a JRE. However, I do have 2 JREs >> installed, a 32-bit and a 64-bit. >> > JREs ha

[libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java

Le 28/11/2016 à 23:05, Keith Barber a écrit : Hi Keith, > Thank you for this Alex. Not sure I'm computerate enough to know the > difference between a JDK and a JRE. However, I do have 2 JREs > installed, a 32-bit and a 64-bit. > JREs have an automatic update mechanism which checks to see whet

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java

Thank you for this Alex. Not sure I'm computerate enough to know the difference between a JDK and a JRE. However, I do have 2 JREs installed, a 32-bit and a 64-bit. Good news: it looks as if I may have cracked it, at least temporarily. Bad news: it might be a bug of some sort... potentially

[libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java

Le 28/11/2016 à 17:52, Keith Barber a écrit : Hi Keith, > Windows 7 Professional 64 bit Service Pack 1 (unsure whether any further > information would help or how to find it). I am assuming you are using a 64bit JDK (and not a JRE) ? If so, which version ? Alex -- To unsubscribe e-mail to:

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work

Tom :) --- On Fri, 18/5/12, NoOp wrote: From: NoOp Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work To: users@global.libreoffice.org Date: Friday, 18 May, 2012, 5:02 On 5/17/2012 4:28 AM, Tom Davies wrote: > Hi :) I think the last official release was a 6, possibly the 6

[libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work

On 5/17/2012 12:10 PM, steelej wrote: > > NoOp wrote ... >> 1.7.0_04 works for me w/WinXP,W7, and linux. The WinXP is running in >> VMWare, the W7 is running from a partition. Can you be a little more >> specific as to what is not working? >> >> >> When I select Java 1.7 as the runtime environme

[libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work

gt; > --- On Thu, 17/5/12, NoOp wrote: > > From: NoOp Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: > Base and Java 1.7 - does not work To: users@global.libreoffice.org > Date: Thursday, 17 May, 2012, 1:32 > > On 05/15/2012 03:19 PM, Andreas Säger wrote: >> There is no reason to

[libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work

NoOp wrote > > On 05/15/2012 03:09 PM, steelej wrote: >> I have been a happy user of LO for a long time but have just started to >> explore Base. >> >> I have been unable to get Base to work with the latest JRE on Windows >> Vista >> or on W7. When I select this version in the Java options it fa

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work

anstaafl wrote: From: Tanstaafl Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work To: users@global.libreoffice.org Date: Thursday, 17 May, 2012, 18:40 On 2012-05-17 9:48 AM, Pertti Rönnberg wrote: > It is a little astonishing and worrying to read that LibreO is a 32-bit >

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work

On 2012-05-17 9:48 AM, Pertti Rönnberg wrote: It is a little astonishing and worrying to read that LibreO is a 32-bit application under any Windows-OS but I have seen no info about LibreO being only 32-bits - not 64 bits nor 32/64 bits. I have been told that a 64-bit machine needs 64-bits softwa

[libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work

Am 17.05.2012 15:48, Pertti Rönnberg wrote: Dear LibreO folks out there, In two of his mails Andreas Säger says >> "In any case it -- (Java 1.7) -- has to be 32 bit because under Windows the office (LibreOffice) is a 32 bit application. " >> "The 32/64 Java bits have to match with the LibreOffi

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work

old a full pint!  In our case the operating system is the container and the apps are the tasty beer :)  Regards from Tom :)  --- On Thu, 17/5/12, Pertti Rönnberg wrote: From: Pertti Rönnberg Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work To: users@global.libreoffic

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work

Dear LibreO folks out there, In two of his mails Andreas Säger says >>"In any case it -- (Java 1.7) -- has to be 32 bit because under Windows the office (LibreOffice) is a 32 bit application. " >>"The 32/64 Java bits have to match with the LibreOffice bits which means 32 bit on all Windo

[libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work

Am 17.05.2012 02:32, NoOp wrote: Perhaps if you would include some quotation from the post others could understand what you are replying to. I see nothing in the OP that indicates 'steelej' was using a 64 bit version. You are right. Java 1.7 works well with LibO 3.5. I tested with external

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work

: NoOp Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work To: users@global.libreoffice.org Date: Thursday, 17 May, 2012, 1:32 On 05/15/2012 03:19 PM, Andreas Säger wrote: > There is no reason to run Java 1.7 unless required by some bleeding edge > application. Even then y

[libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work

On 05/15/2012 03:09 PM, steelej wrote: > I have been a happy user of LO for a long time but have just started to > explore Base. > > I have been unable to get Base to work with the latest JRE on Windows Vista > or on W7. When I select this version in the Java options it fails to > recognise that i

[libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work

On 05/15/2012 03:19 PM, Andreas Säger wrote: > There is no reason to run Java 1.7 unless required by some bleeding edge > application. Even then you can install a second Java 1.6 and point the Java 1.7_0.4 is the current recommended _released_ version of Java. https://www.java.com/en/download/man

[libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work

Sorry, I forgot to mention that even Base is usable without Java. Most of the Java additions do not add any functionality of importance and the *embedded* HSQLDB is not worth trying anyway. Important: HyperSQL as a stand-alone database is mature, best breed Java software and extremely useful. W

[libreoffice-users] Re: Base and Java 1.7 - does not work

There is no reason to run Java 1.7 unless required by some bleeding edge application. Even then you can install a second Java 1.6 and point the office to that installation. In any case it has to be 32 bit because under Windows the office is a 32 bit application. -- For unsubscribe instruction