[389-users] 389 hang while upgrading from 1.2.2 to 1.2.10

2013-03-18 Thread Roberto Polli
k you very much + Peace, R. -- Roberto Polli Community Manager Babel S.r.l. - http://www.babel.it T: +39.06.9826.9651 M: +39.340.652.2736 F: +39.06.9826.9680 P.zza S.Benedetto da Norcia, 33 - 00040 Pomezia (Roma) CONFIDENZIALE: Questo messaggio ed i suoi allegati sono di carattere confidenz

Re: [389-users] dsadmin python library - about Entry behavior

2013-03-18 Thread Roberto Polli
x27;:['organization', 'top', 'domain']}) you'll end up with a strange result. Do you think we should raise an exception if dict.values are strings? Peace, R: -- Roberto Polli Community Manager Babel S.r.l. - http://www.babel.it T: +39.06.9826.9651 M: +

Re: [389-users] dsadmin python library

2013-03-14 Thread Roberto Polli
On Wednesday 13 March 2013 09:33:05 Rich Megginson wrote: > a separate github repo just for dsadmin.py yes. It could become an useful stand-alone library. Peace, R. -- Roberto Polli Community Manager Babel S.r.l. - http://www.babel.it T: +39.06.9826.9651 M: +39.340.652.2736 F: +39.06.9826.9

Re: [389-users] Questions on RedHat DS9.0 Deployment Guide (schema replication)

2012-04-03 Thread Roberto Polli
eg. decreased manageability, lack of tracking of schema > > files,...)? > > It's a trade off - it's easier to manage your custom schema if you have > your own separate schema file, but then you have to replicate it > yourself with puppet/cfengine agreed. Peace, R. -- Robe

Re: [389-users] Building 1.2.7

2010-11-30 Thread Roberto Polli
On Monday 29 November 2010 19:14:01 Rich Megginson wrote: > .. you have a couple of choices > 1) continue to use mozldap ok, I'll stay with it. Are there any drawbacks? Peace, R: -- Roberto Polli Project Manager Babel S.r.l. - http://www.babel.it T: +39.06.91801075 M: +39.34

[389-users] perldap: perl-mozldap-1.5.3 bug+patch for 1.5.3 (latest stable)

2010-11-24 Thread Roberto Polli
l(ld, ctrls, chgtypep, prevdnp, chgnumpresentp, chgnump); #endif Let me know+Peace, R. -- Roberto Polli Project Manager Babel S.r.l. - http://www.babel.it T: +39.06.91801075 M: +39.340.6522736 F: +39.06.91612446 P.zza S.Benedetto da Norcia, 33 - 00040 Pom

Re: [389-users] 389 for Ubuntu: launchpad & co

2010-10-01 Thread Roberto Polli
directory-server to give a continuous ubuntu support to 389org. Who's willing to create/join a group? Peace, R: -- Roberto Polli Babel S.r.l. - http://www.babel.it Tel. +39.06.91801075 - fax +39.06.91612446 Tel. cel +39.340.6522736 P.zza S.Benedetto da Norcia, 33 - 00040 Pomezia (Roma) &q

Re: [389-users] new 00core.ldif break other ldif

2010-07-23 Thread Roberto Polli
Peace, R: -- Roberto Polli Babel S.r.l. - http://www.babel.it Tel. +39.06.91801075 - fax +39.06.91612446 Tel. cel +39.340.6522736 P.zza S.Benedetto da Norcia, 33 - 00040 Pomezia (Roma) "Il seguente messaggio contiene informazioni riservate. Qualora questo messaggio fosse da Voi ricevuto per er

[389-users] new 00core.ldif break other ldif

2010-07-23 Thread Roberto Polli
Hi all, it seems that the new 00core.ldif doesn't contain the NAME alias for the fields (eg. "cn" "commonName") it cause other old ldif not to work under new releases of fds. Why are the aliases have been removed? Thx+Peace, R. -- Roberto Polli Babel S.r.l.

[389-users] Sabayon/Gentoo distribution of 389org

2010-07-06 Thread Roberto Polli
question: - did some of you test 389org on Fedora Linux or RHEL6? Peace, R. -- Roberto Polli Babel S.r.l. - http://www.babel.it Tel. +39.06.91801075 - fax +39.06.91612446 Tel. cel +39.340.6522736 P.zza S.Benedetto da Norcia, 33 - 00040 Pomezia (Roma) "Il seguente messaggio contiene informa

Re: [389-users] dynamic group expansion: writing a patch...

2010-05-18 Thread Roberto Polli
On Tuesday 18 May 2010 16:28:48 Rich Megginson wrote: > ...I would start with the member of plugin code. I'll take a look. do you think it will be better to extend memberof plugin or play directly into the group entry thx+Peace, R. -- Roberto Polli Babel S.r.l. - http://www.babe

Re: [389-users] Cache tuning errors

2010-04-01 Thread Roberto Polli
On Thursday 01 April 2010 16:58:18 j...@scusting.com wrote: > > on 64bit or 32bit? > Fedora 10 - 32bit: Linux 2.6.27.25-170.2.72.fc10.i686.PAE #1 SMP Sun > Jun 21 18:51:33 EDT 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux so that's it.. ;) see rich answer. on 64bit I got no issues. Peace, R. -