Re: [one-users] Suspending virtual machines (ONe vs. virsh) and wake-on-lan.

2012-08-14 Thread Ruben S. Montero
Hi > My questions: > > 1) If a kvm process is thus suspended by virsh, is there any way > to recover it via opennebula? "onevm resume" looks for > the checkpoint file which is not there, fails, and then > does a onevm delete. > No out-of-the-box, but you could easily modify the restore script to

Re: [one-users] Suspending virtual machines (ONe vs. virsh) and wake-on-lan.

2012-08-13 Thread Shankhadeep Shome
I've used sr-iov with intel 10gbe cards and what i've noticed is that the virtual functions do not support wake-on-lan. Also if by any chance your physical function is disabled all your virtual functions will cease to transfer traffic because the physical functions is responsible for the virtual sw

[one-users] Suspending virtual machines (ONe vs. virsh) and wake-on-lan.

2012-08-13 Thread Steven Timm
I am currently running both OpenNebula 3.2 and OpenNebula 2.0, both using KVM hypervisors and network interfaces that involve virtio drivers I've noticed that the "onevm suspend" action does something different than "virsh suspend". With "onevm suspend", the kvm process writes a memory checkpoin