Re: [RCU] RC vs reply-to

2014-01-20 Thread Ben Schmidt
Reply All should also honor Reply-To: IMHO. Example: Suppose that Secretary Suzy sends Jack an e-mail, with Reply-To: set to Boss Bob, and there is a Cc: to Amy. From: Secretary Suzy Reply To: Bob Boss To: Jack Cc: Amy Jack hits Reply All, and the mail should go To: Boss Bob in

Re: [RCU] RC vs reply-to

2014-01-19 Thread Noel Butler
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 10:00 +1000, Noel Butler wrote: > On Sun, 2014-01-19 at 08:35 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote: > > > > > > > The RCU list is the only recipient, though. That's how "this kind of > > > list" works. > > > > There indeed is something broken about the roundcube list, but it is n

Re: [RCU] RC vs reply-to

2014-01-19 Thread Noel Butler
On Sun, 2014-01-19 at 08:35 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote: > > > The RCU list is the only recipient, though. That's how "this kind of > > list" works. > > There indeed is something broken about the roundcube list, but it is not > just because of Reply-To munging. > > Example... the dovecot ema

Re: [RCU] RC vs reply-to

2014-01-19 Thread Charles Marcus
On 2014-01-18 7:23 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote: On 18.01.2014 05:51, Charles Marcus wrote: On 2014-01-17 9:26 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote: The Reply, Reply All both go to the list, empty CC. The Reply List function does the same thing. I'd expect the same behavior from anything else. Mutt, Pine, Elm,

Re: [RCU] RC vs reply-to

2014-01-18 Thread Kaz Kylheku
On 18.01.2014 05:51, Charles Marcus wrote: On 2014-01-17 9:26 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote: The Reply, Reply All both go to the list, empty CC. The Reply List function does the same thing. I'd expect the same behavior from anything else. Mutt, Pine, Elm, T-Bird, Squirrelmail, MS Outlook 2010, what

Re: [RCU] RC vs reply-to

2014-01-18 Thread Benny Pedersen
On 2014-01-18 12:17, Andreas Dick wrote: I write this mail with 8.2: Replay, Replay All and List all go to the list, one difference is that Replay uses "Roundcube Users mailing list " and the two others uses the plain mail address: "users@lists.roundcube.net" okay, check CVE on this version

Re: [RCU] RC vs reply-to

2014-01-18 Thread Charles Marcus
On 2014-01-17 9:26 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote: The Reply, Reply All both go to the list, empty CC. The Reply List function does the same thing. I'd expect the same behavior from anything else. Mutt, Pine, Elm, T-Bird, Squirrelmail, MS Outlook 2010, what have you. What crap. If all of these butt

Re: [RCU] RC vs reply-to

2014-01-18 Thread Andreas Dick
The slightly out of date version I'm running (0.9.2) has no problem with this list. The Reply, Reply All both go to the list, empty CC. The Reply List function does the same thing. I write this mail with 8.2: Replay, Replay All and List all go to the list, one difference is that Replay uses "

Re: [RCU] RC vs reply-to

2014-01-17 Thread Benny Pedersen
On 2014-01-18 03:26, Kaz Kylheku wrote: On 17.01.2014 17:17, Benny Pedersen wrote: i will just start a new thread now and ask if there is a problem with roundcube not working with maillists like this one ? The slightly out of date version I'm running (0.9.2) has no problem with this list. the

Re: [RCU] RC vs reply-to

2014-01-17 Thread Kaz Kylheku
On 17.01.2014 17:17, Benny Pedersen wrote: i will just start a new thread now and ask if there is a problem with roundcube not working with maillists like this one ? The slightly out of date version I'm running (0.9.2) has no problem with this list. The Reply, Reply All both go to the list,

[RCU] RC vs reply-to

2014-01-17 Thread Benny Pedersen
i will just start a new thread now and ask if there is a problem with roundcube not working with maillists like this one ? please dont reply if you dont use roundcube, if this would be a very long thread maybe we can get it fixed ? ___ Roundcube User