xdoclet plugin and multiple java source directories

2003-11-30 Thread J. Matthew Pryor
I am pretty sure this one is for the xdoclet developers but I am wondering if anyone here has come across this. I am writing an AndroMDA maven plugin. Its working well, but I am having trouble when it comes time to run xdoclet on the AndroMDA generated code AndroMDA generates 2 kinds of files. On

Re: [VOTE] The Maven Logo

2003-11-30 Thread Scott Tavares
Jason van Zyl wrote: On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 16:00, Vincent Massol wrote: I'd like to see the report registration mechanism untied from the site plugin so that any plugin wishing to use it can. Once this is done, all plugins web site generation plugins will be equal. It's been suggested bef

Re: maven:site and Forrest (was Re: [VOTE] The Maven Logo)

2003-11-30 Thread Paul Libbrecht
Jason van Zyl wrote: Are you actually confirming you believe it's an overkill even ofr jakarta commons ? Absolutely it's overkill. Additionally if I ever made a live site tool for Maven I would personally never use anything Cocoon-based. That's my preference and as such carries some weight around

Torque Plugin

2003-11-30 Thread Jason van Zyl
Hi Martin, The torque plugin is now part of Torque, yes? I just wanted to check as I want to nuke the issues related to the torque plugin in Maven's JIRA install. -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational

Help get your plugin patches/fixes applied!

2003-11-30 Thread Jason van Zyl
Hi, Anyone who wants to get their fixes or patches applied expediently I make the following offer. If you have patches/fixes you want applied and they are in JIRA and globbed in with core issues then 1. Send me an email telling me which plugin you're interested and I will create a project for t

RE: [VOTE] The Maven Logo

2003-11-30 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 16:00, Vincent Massol wrote: > I'd like to see the report registration mechanism untied from the site > plugin so that any plugin wishing to use it can. Once this is done, all > plugins web site generation plugins will be equal. It's been suggested before, I think when Berin

RE: [VOTE] The Maven Logo

2003-11-30 Thread Vincent Massol
> -Original Message- > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 30 November 2003 21:51 > To: Maven Users List > Subject: RE: [VOTE] The Maven Logo > > On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 14:59, Vincent Massol wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [VOTE] The Maven Logo

2003-11-30 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 14:54, Paul Libbrecht wrote: > Jason van Zyl wrote: > > On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 11:20, Adam R. B. Jack wrote: > >>What am I missing? This is sounding like Forrest. Why duplicate, why not > >>collaborate? > > Forrest is massive overkill for most sites, additionally it barely > >

RE: [VOTE] The Maven Logo

2003-11-30 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 14:59, Vincent Massol wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 30 November 2003 20:41 > > To: Maven Users List > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] The Maven Logo > > > > On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 11:20, Adam R. B. Jack wrote: > > > Wha

RE: [VOTE] The Maven Logo

2003-11-30 Thread Vincent Massol
> -Original Message- > From: Paul Libbrecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 30 November 2003 21:14 > To: Maven Users List > Subject: Re: [VOTE] The Maven Logo > > Vincent Massol wrote: > > In any case, Maven has an open architecture and Forrest has a Maven > > plugin. That's cool. User

Re: [VOTE] The Maven Logo

2003-11-30 Thread Paul Libbrecht
Vincent Massol wrote: In any case, Maven has an open architecture and Forrest has a Maven plugin. That's cool. Users can choose to use whichever they prefer. Mmmh, is that not a Forrest plugin for maven ? http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=turbine-maven-dev&m=105438035409490&w=2 I am a bit unclear on

RE: [VOTE] The Maven Logo

2003-11-30 Thread Vincent Massol
> -Original Message- > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 30 November 2003 20:41 > To: Maven Users List > Subject: Re: [VOTE] The Maven Logo > > On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 11:20, Adam R. B. Jack wrote: > > What am I missing? This is sounding like Forrest. Why duplicate, why

Re: [VOTE] The Maven Logo

2003-11-30 Thread Paul Libbrecht
Jason van Zyl wrote: On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 11:20, Adam R. B. Jack wrote: What am I missing? This is sounding like Forrest. Why duplicate, why not collaborate? Forrest is massive overkill for most sites, additionally it barely worked when we started Maven and as far as I know is still rather unwield

Re: [VOTE] The Maven Logo

2003-11-30 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 11:20, Adam R. B. Jack wrote: > What am I missing? This is sounding like Forrest. Why duplicate, why not > collaborate? Forrest is massive overkill for most sites, additionally it barely worked when we started Maven and as far as I know is still rather unwieldly in terms of s

Re: [VOTE] The Maven Logo

2003-11-30 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
What am I missing? This is sounding like Forrest. Why duplicate, why not collaborate? regards Adam - Original Message - From: "Mark R. Diggory" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Maven Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2003 8:58 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] The Maven Logo > >

Re: [VOTE] The Maven Logo

2003-11-30 Thread Mark R. Diggory
Paul Libbrecht wrote: An alternative would be to actually consider a complete notion of skin. And this is probably going to happen very soon I think... xdoc implementors, hasn't it already been thought about ? With the cool download mechanism of maven, it really looks to be something we could

Maven SCM has landed! :-)

2003-11-30 Thread Jason van Zyl
http://blogs.codehaus.org/projects/maven/archives/000271.html -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technologi

jar dying on test:test

2003-11-30 Thread khote
all of a sudden my projects which use jar:install are dying on Goal [test:test] has no action definition. I have not changed anything at all in my maven setup, not one thing. Has maven downloaded some crap while I wasn't watching, that doesn't work? Kevin -