code-house.org
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Excluding-beta-N-from-a-range-tp5892806p5894368.html
Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsu
Thanks karl, the version range semantic is much clear now for me.
-D
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 3:03 AM, Karl Heinz Marbaise
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 15/01/17 12:01, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 13/01/17 16:37, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Florian Sch
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 3:01 AM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 13/01/17 16:37, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Florian Schätz
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Am Donnerstag, den 12.01.2017, 14:22 -0800 schrieb Benson Margulies:
>>>
I agree with them that this is co
Hi,
On 15/01/17 12:01, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
Hi,
On 13/01/17 16:37, Benson Margulies wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Florian Schätz
wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 12.01.2017, 14:22 -0800 schrieb Benson Margulies:
I agree with them that this is counter-intuitive. The whole point of
Hi,
On 13/01/17 16:37, Benson Margulies wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Florian Schätz wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 12.01.2017, 14:22 -0800 schrieb Benson Margulies:
I agree with them that this is counter-intuitive. The whole point of
-beta-1 is to introduce new, incompatible, stuff. T
+1 to fix it at maven-core
-D
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 7:37 AM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Florian Schätz
> wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 12.01.2017, 14:22 -0800 schrieb Benson Margulies:
> >
> >> I agree with them that this is counter-intuitive. The whole point
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Florian Schätz wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 12.01.2017, 14:22 -0800 schrieb Benson Margulies:
>
>> I agree with them that this is counter-intuitive. The whole point of
>> -beta-1 is to introduce new, incompatible, stuff. The whole point of
>> that range is to exclu
Am Donnerstag, den 12.01.2017, 14:22 -0800 schrieb Benson Margulies:
> I agree with them that this is counter-intuitive. The whole point of
> -beta-1 is to introduce new, incompatible, stuff. The whole point of
> that range is to exclude it.
Doesn't 2.0.0-beta1 imply that it's a beta for the 2.0.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Curtis Rueden wrote:
> Hi Benson,
>
>> I did not know how to tell them how to write a range that has the
>> desired effect. Is there one?
>
> Would it work to use a hacky range like:
> [1.0.0,1..]
That is my fallback advice to them, indeed.
The no '.0.0'
Hi Benson,
> I did not know how to tell them how to write a range that has the
> desired effect. Is there one?
Would it work to use a hacky range like:
[1.0.0,1..]
?
Regards,
Curtis
--
Curtis Rueden
LOCI software architect - http://loci.wisc.edu/software
ImageJ2 lead, Fiji maintainer -
Our rule of thumb at $work is NEVER, EVER, E V E R release a .0 artefact for
this exact reason.
Always start with .1
Mark
--
Mark Derricutt
http://www.theoryinpractice.net
http://www.chaliceofblood.net
http://plus.google.com/+MarkDerricutt
http://twitter.com/talios
http://facebook.com/mderricu
Coworkers of mine just got bit, badly, by the following:
a range like:
[1.0.0,2.0.0)
INCLUDES
2.0.0-beta-1.
I agree with them that this is counter-intuitive. The whole point of
-beta-1 is to introduce new, incompatible, stuff. The whole point of
that range is to exclude it.
I did not know
12 matches
Mail list logo
