Re: Spam scores not in log

2005-11-25 Thread jdow
From: Evan Platt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: 2005 November, 24, Thursday 23:41 Subject: Re: Spam scores not in log At 06:58 PM 11/24/2005, you wrote: For some reason I am not getting the spam scores in the mail log. I am getting the start and stop of

SpamScore Email

2005-11-25 Thread Markus Braun
Hello, i am new on this list. I have a problem. I installed exim4, courier and spamassassin. But every email i sent it out, is marked bei spam. e.g. Spam Score 1.6 Can i turn it of or is some configuration error? Thanks a lot marcus

Sql don't work ??

2005-11-25 Thread Noc Phibee
Hi I want use SpamAssassin 3.0.4 with Sql for put a personalized Tag. I run spamd with daemontools : /usr/bin/spamd -q -x -c -m5 -H i don't have information into local.cf my sql.cf: user_scores_dsn DBI:mysql:SpamAssassin:localhost user_scores_sql_username SpamAssassin

Re: check_whitelist

2005-11-25 Thread Kevin W. Gagel
Where does one get the check_whitelist tool? It's in the tools subdirectory of the tarball. I used CPAN to install SpamAssassin (3.0.1) and a find on the system does not locate the tool. Are you sure you did 3.0.1 not 3.1.0? check in ~/.cpan/ and find where CPAN unpacked the SA tarball when

SORBS

2005-11-25 Thread jdow
It seems they have taken leave of their database. The Earthlink mailers have somehow gotten listed in their DUL listings. They are quite positively not DUL based. If SORBS can get this screwed up I'd suggest lowering their scores in the rules files. ===8--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ dig

Re: SORBS

2005-11-25 Thread List Mail User
... It seems they have taken leave of their database. The Earthlink mailers have somehow gotten listed in their DUL listings. They are quite positively not DUL based. If SORBS can get this screwed up I'd suggest lowering their scores in the rules files. ===8--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ dig

Re: SORBS

2005-11-25 Thread jdow
From: List Mail User [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... It seems they have taken leave of their database. The Earthlink mailers have somehow gotten listed in their DUL listings. They are quite positively not DUL based. If SORBS can get this screwed up I'd suggest lowering their scores in the rules files.

Re: SORBS

2005-11-25 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
I've got to agree that the TTL criteria doesn't necessarily reflect reality... at least in these parts. Using SORBS' self-help system, I can delist my residential cable IP which is pseudo-static but I cannot delist my business DSL IP which is static (and 3 times the price). Of course, my

Re: SORBS

2005-11-25 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 25 November 2005 19:09, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: I've got to agree that the TTL criteria doesn't necessarily reflect reality... at least in these parts. Using SORBS' self-help system, I can delist my residential cable IP which is pseudo-static but I cannot delist my business DSL IP

Re: SORBS

2005-11-25 Thread Graham Murray
Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Of course, my business DSL provider could be less brain dead and not set a 30 min TTL for their entire forward zone (and 1 day for their reverse zone), but I suspect there are lots of people out there in the same situation. Where the provider