Quoting Sean Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Sorry for replying to my own topic, but I've figured out what's causing
it to go so slow.
It's the rules in sa-blacklist.current.uri.cf from
http://www.sa-blacklist.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/sa-blacklist.current.uri.cf.
This ruleset works fine in 3.1, I
Sean Kennedy wrote:
Sorry for replying to my own topic, but I've figured out what's
causing it to go so slow.
It's the rules in sa-blacklist.current.uri.cf from
http://www.sa-blacklist.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/sa-blacklist.current.uri.cf.
This ruleset works fine in 3.1, I'm not sure why it
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:34:09 -0800
Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any place to easily query whois information to determine on
> a mass scale how old a domain is?
Don't know myself. All I can say is don't query whois on Network
Solutions for possible availability of a domain to
Is there any place to easily query whois information to determine on a
mass scale how old a domain is?
Hello,
Here is a complete sample without a link (because
apache.org bounced the message due the "spam"
content) with logs relevant to the message. I
have tar.gz/tgz the message to hopefully pass the
spam filter.
Here is the message:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTE
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Sean Kennedy wrote:
It's the rules in sa-blacklist.current.uri.cf from
http://www.sa-blacklist.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/sa-blacklist.current.uri.cf.
This ruleset works fine in 3.1, I'm not sure why it doesn't in 3.2, any
insight?
Don't use it. It's a huge list of URIs t
Sorry for replying to my own topic, but I've figured out what's causing
it to go so slow.
It's the rules in sa-blacklist.current.uri.cf from
http://www.sa-blacklist.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/sa-blacklist.current.uri.cf.
This ruleset works fine in 3.1, I'm not sure why it doesn't in 3.2, any
i
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 11:49 -0500, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
> > From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > I've pointed it out before. Just use ok_locales, which is all about
> > these char sets. No REs, almost no thinking required, no headache. A
> > single line, and you're done
On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 04:26 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> KB> If you want to trigger on Russian only, list all but ru.
> What if to catch Ms. Ba'loney Margar'ine, airport security had to keep a
> current list of all the other people in the world. So this is the
> wrong approach, as we've been
I recently upgraded from v3.1.9 to v3.2.4 and I've noticed a substantial
increase in scan times. The general average scantime with v3.1 was
about 1.2s and now with v3.2 it's about 2.2s. It's enough of a slow
down so that my mail queue backs quite easily now.
So I'm trying to debug SA and fig
KB> If you want to trigger on Russian only, list all but ru.
What if to catch Ms. Ba'loney Margar'ine, airport security had to keep a
current list of all the other people in the world. So this is the
wrong approach, as we've been thru before. OK, bye.
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 11:04 -0800, Paul Douglas Franklin wrote:
> I believe that what you are asking for is
> meta RUSSIAN_AND_BADTEXT (CHARSET_FARAWAY && __OTHER_RULE)
> That requires first that you have set up ok_locales.
If you have TextCat enabled, then the X-Language: meta header will be
add
I believe that what you are asking for is
meta RUSSIAN_AND_BADTEXT (CHARSET_FARAWAY && __OTHER_RULE)
That requires first that you have set up ok_locales.
--Paul
Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've pointed it out before. Just use ok_locales, which
> From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I've pointed it out before. Just use ok_locales, which is all about
> these char sets. No REs, almost no thinking required, no headache. A
> single line, and you're done.
What's the best way to test the character set for use in a meta rule?
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 17:10 +1300, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
> > From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Why are you guys now trying to re-invent the wheel in the special case
> > of a gray asphalt street? What about a dirt track, grass, and anything
> > else a wheel works on?
> >
15 matches
Mail list logo
