Spamassassion for each site

2010-08-10 Thread nonlin
Dear sirs, I am new to this list, So I hope I have the right email address. I am running a Blue Quartz with spamassassin pre installed. I don't know the version. I have run the gtube test and it works fine for my admin email account, it is marking them as spam. but it is marking any of emails

Re: AWL demoted??

2010-08-10 Thread LuKreme
On 10-Aug-2010, at 17:55, Dennis German wrote: > > My ISP MidPhase.com, part of uk2group.com, uses cpanel.net (used by many > ISPs) > which seems to be "stuck" on SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) > > I request they upgrade last year and they weren't interested. > I request this last week and

Re: List of "banned" words/bounce to sender

2010-08-10 Thread jdow
From: "Martin Gregorie" Sent: Monday, 2010/August/09 18:08 On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 17:42 -0700, jdow wrote: From: "Martin Gregorie" > Something like this will match a sequence of two capitalised name > words, > including hyphenated ones, and extract the name words: > > /([A-Z][-a-zA-Z]{1,20}

Re: AWL demoted??

2010-08-10 Thread Benny Pedersen
On ons 11 aug 2010 01:55:45 CEST, Dennis German wrote I request they upgrade last year and they weren't interested. I request this last week and they are still evaluating it. you speak to the wrong people that maintains you server hosting and belive thay also make the spamassassin packages f

AWL demoted??

2010-08-10 Thread Dennis German
On Jul 22, 2010, at 10:47 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:... due to performance vs accuracy issues, AWL was demoted in SA 3.3x. Can you please define "demoted". My ISP MidPhase.com, part of uk2group.com, uses cpanel.net (used by many ISPs) which seems to be "stuck

Re: List of "banned" words/bounce to sender

2010-08-10 Thread John Hardin
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, Henrik K wrote: On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 07:37:32AM -0700, John Hardin wrote: On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, Henrik K wrote: Ok I did some more testing since this is an interesting experiment.. I dumped 15000 mail bodies into a file like SA sees them and feeded it to simple Perl sc

Re: List of "banned" words/bounce to sender

2010-08-10 Thread Henrik K
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 07:37:32AM -0700, John Hardin wrote: > On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, Henrik K wrote: > > >Ok I did some more testing since this is an interesting experiment.. > > > >I dumped 15000 mail bodies into a file like SA sees them and > >feeded it to simple Perl script. > > > >Runtime for d

Re: List of "banned" words/bounce to sender

2010-08-10 Thread John Hardin
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, Henrik K wrote: Ok I did some more testing since this is an interesting experiment.. I dumped 15000 mail bodies into a file like SA sees them and feeded it to simple Perl script. Runtime for different methods (memory used including Perl itself): - Single 7 name rege

Re: spamc REPORT/PROCESS Confusion

2010-08-10 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 10:51 +0200, Andreas Dunkl wrote: > Am 09.08.2010 18:17, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann: > > > That commercial application running on box B uses different options with > > spamc. If it adds the returned string as headers, it is broken. > > Ooook, i got the Point. > > Thx for y

Re: List of "banned" words/bounce to sender

2010-08-10 Thread Henrik K
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 01:35:55PM +0300, Henrik K wrote: > > Big help was page 20+: > > > Basically you need to do something like: > > $pat = qr/\b(([a-z][-a-z]{2,15}[a-z]),? ([a-z][-a-z]{2,15}[

Re: List of "banned" words/bounce to sender

2010-08-10 Thread Henrik K
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:47:15AM +0100, Martin Gregorie wrote: > On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 11:19 +0300, Henrik K wrote: > > Runtime for different methods (memory used including Perl itself): > > > > - Single 7 name regex, 20s (8MB) > > - 7 regexes of 1 names each, 141s (9MB) > > - "Martin st

Re: List of "banned" words/bounce to sender

2010-08-10 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 11:19 +0300, Henrik K wrote: > Runtime for different methods (memory used including Perl itself): > > - Single 7 name regex, 20s (8MB) > - 7 regexes of 1 names each, 141s (9MB) > - "Martin style", lookups from Perl hash, 8s (12MB) > Very interesting indeed. Thanks fo

Re: spamc REPORT/PROCESS Confusion

2010-08-10 Thread Andreas Dunkl
Hi there, Am 09.08.2010 18:17, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann: > That commercial application running on box B uses different options with > spamc. If it adds the returned string as headers, it is broken. Ooook, i got the Point. Thx for your Input. andy

Re: List of "banned" words/bounce to sender

2010-08-10 Thread Henrik K
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 02:08:28AM +0100, Martin Gregorie wrote: > On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 17:42 -0700, jdow wrote: > > From: "Martin Gregorie" > > > Something like this will match a sequence of two capitalised name words, > > > including hyphenated ones, and extract the name words: > > > > > > /([A