I effectively need to be able to create 2 or more SpamAssassin
configurations and have them work entirely independently.
I hope that explains it well enough.
This should probably be opened as a bug on the bugzilla, btw.
How much detail do you want?
is it already there?
I&#
At 19:11 25/09/2004, you wrote:
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Julian Field wrote:
At 18:23 25/09/2004, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Since it's getting to the point where SpamAssassin in its entirety has
quite a few dependencies and requirements, perhaps could someone create
a Bundle package
n the right order.
It won't take you a minute to remove the ClamAV bits if you don't want them.
--
Julian FieldTeaching Systems Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Electronics & Computer Science
Tel. 023 8059 2817 Univer
com/page";>here
much less about tags, but only cases like
| Please visit http://phisher.com/path/to/page";>http://example.com/page
Those ones, indeed.
--
Julian FieldTeaching Systems Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Electronics & Computer Science
Te
5AM -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, September 15, 2004, 1:38:30 AM, Julian Field wrote:
> >> > ... Is it possible to detect where
> >> > bar
> >> > and foo and bar are unrelated domains?
> >>
> >> That could be a good idea fo
I have checked the archives, can't find anything directly related to this.
In most phishing scams, the real address of a URL is unrelated to the link
text that appears in the mail client. Is it possible to detect where
bar
and foo and bar are unrelated domains?
Thanks folks.
--
Julian
procmail, no sendmail.cf changes, no spamc/spamd, no extra
"spamassassin" script, nothing.
--
Julian FieldTeaching Systems Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Electronics & Computer Science
Tel. 023 8059 2817 University of Southampton
Southampton SO17 1BJ
