( Thu, 27 Jan 2005 17:04:47 -0500 ) Chris Santerre :
> If I misunderstood this, I'm sorry. But can you sip the first server from
> scanning the messege with SA? Seems the logical solution.
Not really.
Because SA still have tu run on the first server.
I leave it, but the users stay :-)
Well I wou
Hello.
I have a problem with one mail system.
First, I used an exim4 MTA combined with SA. (Let SA be SpamAssassin)
SA used to rewrite the X-Spam-xxx flags to report what he finds. It's
OK, the stuff work very well, the $HOME/.forward filter on X-Spam-xxx
header is OK.
SA changes the spam mess
On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 00:06 -0800, Loren Wilton wrote:
> If you are on 3.0 and you installed in a clean directory it is impossible
> that this is in the stock rules. So it must be left over in some
> site-specific rules you have somewhere.
# grep RCVD_IN_ORBS *.cf
20_head_tests.cf:header RCVD_IN_
On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 01:49 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
> What ancient version of SA are you using? RCVD_IN_ORBS hasn't been a part
> of SA in a LONG time. The last version of SA to include this test in
> the ruleset at all was 2.55 (may 2003).
I already heard that on this list, and I have u
Hello,
I would like to know if there are some other "open relay list", because
I think the default behaviour of the dorkslayers server is not really
good: it tells
RCVD_IN_ORBS RBL: Received via a relay in orbs.dorkslayers.com
[66.218.66.58 listed in orbs.dorkslayers.com]
Hello,
I see that SA checks razor DB. Great.
I guess SA also report spam to the razor DB by default. Am I right ?
--
ASPO Infogérance http://aspo.rktmb.org/activites/infogerance
Unofficial FAQ fcolc http://faq.fcolc.eu.org/
LUG sur Orléans et alentours.
Tél : 02 38 76 43 65 (France)
On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 15:34 +0100, Thomas Arend wrote:
> score BAYES_99 0 0 4.070 4.070 # or as high as you suggest.
uh! What man page should I read to understand that syntax ?
What are the 4 numbers following BAYES_99 ?
I thought It would just be followed by one number: the score.
> To raise
Hello,
I see that in SA 3x, the scores have changed.
I would like to increase/decrease the scores of come criterias.
Espacielly the BAYES_99 test.
My /etc/spamassassin/50_scores.cf file does not contain any indication
about it, and I see it's scored 1.9 instead of the 1 told by the heading
comment
Hello,
I'm looking for a recent package of Spamassassin for Debian STABLE
(Woody) please. Either 2.64 or 3.x ?
The apt-get.org has no one.
Where could I find ?
[This is a crosspost to SA and Debian list so please set the
"Reply-to":]
--
ASPO Infogérance http://aspo.rktmb.org/activites/in
On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 13:50, Greg - Cirelle Enterprises wrote:
> or is my email messed up again
May be or singature is too much long :-)
--
ASPO Infogérance http://aspo.rktmb.org/activites/infogerance
Unofficial FAQ fcolc http://faq.fcolc.eu.org/
LUG sur Orléans et alentours.
Tél : 02 38
On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 20:39, Matt Kettler wrote:
> ># spamassassin -V
> >SpamAssassin version 2.64
>
> If your system actually has a "RCVD_IN_ORBS" rule, then you likely have
> some form of config-file corruption and are using rules from an old version
> of SA.
How could I diagnosys such a thi
On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 19:19, Matt Kettler wrote:
> By the way, how ancient a version of SA are you using? ORBS hasn't been
> used by SA since 2.55. (although alternate-language describes existed
> through 2.64, no actual rule exists in the 2.6x or 3.x families)
# spamassassin -V
SpamAssassin v
HEllo,
I would like to know how to increase the "rate" or the "mark" of a
message received from an open relay.
In fact, we're 99,9% sure that it's a spam! are'nt we?
I would like to set the "rate" of the RCVD_IN_ORBS to 4 (at least).
How to ? Is it a good idea ?
--
ASPO Infogérance http://as
Hello,
I'm running SA 2.64 and I wonder what user should I run sa-learn under.
the exim process is ownned by the Debian-user user (Debian testing,
Exim4).
I have more or less 20 real user users on the server (courrier-IMAP),
and they all move the spam they receive into a dedicated folder. Each
user
On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 22:27, Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina wrote:
> Hello,
Hello
> I got these error messages i dont know to interpret.
> Would you help me to correctly set my system up ?
[...]
> Is there something I have to install more ?
The error messages was attached.
really n
Hello,
I just ran SA 2.64 on my Debian Testing (all installed via apt-get) on a
x86.
I got these error messages i dont know to interpret.
Would you help me to correctly set my system up ?
The way I run SA: Debian init script
OPTIONS="-m 10 -a -H"
(-d is automatically added by the startup script
16 matches
Mail list logo
