> On Sep 23, 2016, at 17.34, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 17:10 -0400, btb wrote:
>> On 2016.09.23 16.16, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 18:43 +0100, RW wrote:
Right, but the question here is why isn't a forwarding server also a
recursiv
> On Dec 19, 2015, at 04.35, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 19.12.2015 um 04:08 schrieb listsb-spamassas...@bitrate.net:
>> On Dec 17, 2015, at 13.16, Alfredo Saldanha
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> My second SA is a Zimbra server.
>>> I use Zimbra SA only to drop the message in junk folder.
>>> I don'
On Dec 17, 2015, at 13.16, Alfredo Saldanha wrote:
>
> My second SA is a Zimbra server.
> I use Zimbra SA only to drop the message in junk folder.
> I don't want to clean at the Zimbra server, it is default behavior.
for what it's worth, if you were to use amavis rather than a milter, you could
> On Feb 12, 2015, at 14.09, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>
> On 2/11/2015 7:25 PM, listsb-spamassas...@bitrate.net wrote:
>> i hope another solicitation for this help request is ok.
>
> It's ok.
>
> Overall, I agree. I tested on a devel box and running sa-compile does have
> an rm line but did l
i hope another solicitation for this help request is ok.
> On Feb 04, 2015, at 09.19, btb wrote:
>
> hi-
>
> i happened to notice a bunch of old files in /tmp/, related to spamassassin.
> after a bit of testing, it looks like sa-compile isn't cleaning up after
> itself?
>
> >ls -alH /tmp/
>
> On Nov 14, 2014, at 11.41, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 14.11.2014 um 17:11 schrieb listsb-spamassas...@bitrate.net:
>> one characteristic that appears to be pretty consistent is the age of the
>> domain name that a given message references [from header, envelope sender,
>> ptr record for rem
this was discussed a while back, in the context of tlds with names of colors
[red, blue, pink, etc]. recently, i'm getting spam from the "rocks" tld [i can
share further detail if it's of interest]. what ultimately happened with the
color tlds, in terms of spamassassin? was there a ruleset mo
> On Nov 30, 2014, at 15.42, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> On 30. nov. 2014 21.12.06 listsb-spamassas...@bitrate.net wrote:
>
>> http://dpaste.com/3XTYV0V.txt
>
> Is trusted_networks and internal_networks correct both for ipv4 and ipv6 ?
>
> Does it match settings in amavisd ?
>
> Both sa and am
> On Dec 08, 2014, at 19.28, Mark Martinec wrote:
>
> Actually, looking at a diff of DBM.pm between 3.4.0 and 3.4.1
> I can see the taint bug has already been fixed by r1608413:
>
> @@ -814,3 +816,3 @@
> my @vars = $self->get_storage_variables();
> - dbg("bayes: DB journal sync: last sync: "
> On Dec 04, 2014, at 12.18, Joe Quinn wrote:
>
> On 12/4/2014 11:17 AM, listsb-spamassas...@bitrate.net wrote:
>> hi-
>>
>> i sent a message to the list yesterday, but have not yet seen it appear.
>> can someone check? my logs indicate successful delivery to
>> mx1.us.apache.org:
>>
>> Dec
hi-
i sent a message to the list yesterday, but have not yet seen it appear. can
someone check? my logs indicate successful delivery to mx1.us.apache.org:
Dec 3 17:48:24 mta postfix/smtp[10226]: 3jtFgN6Dfmz9s2b:
to=, relay=mx1.us.apache.org[140.211.11.136]:25,
delay=56, delays=0.45/0.02/30/
i was testing with a sample message, and noticed that when running manually
with --debug, there seem to be numerous differences in the results, such as
scores for the same tests differing, visual ordering of results differing [is
this significant?], and bayes not being listed when using --debug.
hi-
a message from yahoo seems to have matched FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD, which from my
perspective, the message is not forged [see below pastebin - i hope i've not
removed anything of importance during anonymization]. i noted that dkim
authentication appears to have failed, which, while of interest f
> On Nov 14, 2014, at 00.35, John Hardin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, listsb-spamassas...@bitrate.net wrote:
>
>> all of the emotional postulative opining aside, one possibility i have been
>> considering is having postfix delay relay of messages to the content filter
>> for a few minutes,
hi-
i've recently asked about essentially this same topic on the postfix-users
mailing list, so apologies to those subjected to the repetition.
the topic came up for me a couple of weeks ago when i asked about duplicate
spam that was scoring low the first time it was received:
https://mail-arc
On Sep 8, 2014, at 21.45, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> Some discussion of the underlying issue.
>
> On Tue, 2014-09-09 at 02:59 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>> At the time of the 3.3.2 release, the .club TLD simply didn't exist. It
>> has been accepted by IANA just recently. Of course I was
On Aug 27, 2014, at 18.13, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Wednesday, August 27, 2014 6:06 PM -0400 btb
> wrote:
>
>> hi-
>>
>> we have a system [zimbra] where users can select a message in the mua
>> interface and click a spam or not spam button. this generates a message
>> [containing t
17 matches
Mail list logo