At 05:01 AM Thursday, 9/30/2004, John Fleming wrote -=>
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Kasky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: Preferred DNSBL
> Rejects Since Sunday 4:00 am via rbls:
>
> spamcop: 65
> maps rbl+
September 27, 2004 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: Preferred DNSBL
Rejects Since Sunday 4:00 am via rbls:
spamcop: 65
maps rbl+: 154
dsbl.org: 9
njabl.org: 18
spamhaus: 18
What/how are you guys gathering the data above? Thanks - John
--
"Is Gushi a person or an entity?"
"Yes"
-Bad Ka
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Kasky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: Preferred DNSBL
> Rejects Since Sunday 4:00 am via rbls:
>
> spamcop: 65
> maps rbl+: 154
> dsbl.org: 9
> njabl.org: 18
> spamhaus
At 07:29 AM Tuesday, 9/28/2004, Chris Santerre wrote -=>
However, there are numerous people who don't read the nice little message.
They don't get passed the "Rejected" part.
In all I think I've had to fix maybe 5-6 customers who were blocked over the
coarse of 2.5 years. That's not bad! Want to kn
Chris Santerre wrote:
The question is always, did you block any legit mail...
The question is, can the person blocked read english? I send back a nice
little message saying you have been rejected due to listing on xx.com
RBL. And to send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to be taken off the list.
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:57:28 -0500, "Bob Apthorpe"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi,
Hello.
> On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:10:30 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:52:41 -0400 (EDT), "Dan Mahoney, System Admin"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > > Hey guys, as a quick survey, if
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:47:20 -0400 Kris Deugau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bob Apthorpe wrote:
> > I also firewall traffic from unassigned ARIN netspace - see
> > http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space.
>
> I did this for a while, but somewhere along the line some of those
> unassign
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Kris Deugau wrote:
>
> I did this for a while, but somewhere along the line some of those
> unassigned netblocks got assigned. I didn't discover this until about 6
> months after one corporate customer suddenly couldn't send mail to one
> of their suppliers. Fortunately I had
Bob Apthorpe wrote:
> I also firewall traffic from unassigned ARIN netspace - see
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space.
I did this for a while, but somewhere along the line some of those
unassigned netblocks got assigned. I didn't discover this until about 6
months after one corpo
>-Original Message-
>From: Ed Kasky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 5:56 PM
>To: Raymond Dijkxhoorn
>Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Preferred DNSBL
>
>
>At 12:59 PM Monday, 9/27/2004, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote -=
Hi,
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:10:30 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:52:41 -0400 (EDT), "Dan Mahoney, System Admin"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > Hey guys, as a quick survey, if you're blocking ips at the MTA level,
> > which are you using?
>
> I think it's a bad idea and
On Monday, September 27, 2004, 9:52:41 AM, System Dan Mahoney wrote:
> Hey guys, as a quick survey, if you're blocking ips at the MTA level,
> which are you using?
sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
list.dsbl.org
Spamhaus catches 90+% of them.
Jeff C.
--
Jeff Chan
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.surbl.o
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 12:49:14PM -0700, Ed Kasky wrote:
> At 09:52 AM Monday, 9/27/2004, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote -=>
> > Hey guys, as a quick survey, if you're blocking ips at the MTA level,
> > which are you using?
> Rejects Since Sunday 4:00 am via rbls:
>
> spamcop: 65
> maps rbl+:
John Rudd wrote:
1) Greet_Delay (default 30 seconds) -- had some brief false positives
with mac.com, but they fixed their MTA to stop being so impatient.
You might want to keep in mind that some MTAs that do callout
verification use 30 seconds as the default timeout, and if you make them
wait to
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:52:41 -0400 (EDT), "Dan Mahoney, System Admin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hey guys, as a quick survey, if you're blocking ips at the MTA level,
> which are you using?
I think it's a bad idea and don't do it at all. Much better to configure
your MTA to reject mail based on
At 12:59 PM Monday, 9/27/2004, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote -=>
Hi!
Rejects Since Sunday 4:00 am via rbls:
spamcop: 65
maps rbl+: 154
dsbl.org: 9
njabl.org: 18
spamhaus: 18
The question is always, did you block any legit mail...
Since this server supplies email for a limited number of users, we made th
> Hey guys, as a quick survey, if you're blocking ips at the MTA level,
> which are you using?
sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
On Sep 27, 2004, at 12:59 PM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
Hi!
Rejects Since Sunday 4:00 am via rbls:
spamcop: 65
maps rbl+: 154
dsbl.org: 9
njabl.org: 18
spamhaus: 18
The question is always, did you block any legit mail...
I realize that the thread here is specifically about DNSBL's, but I
think one
Hi!
Rejects Since Sunday 4:00 am via rbls:
spamcop: 65
maps rbl+: 154
dsbl.org: 9
njabl.org: 18
spamhaus: 18
The question is always, did you block any legit mail...
Bye,
Raymond.
Rejects Since Sunday 4:00 am via rbls:
spamcop: 65
maps rbl+: 154
dsbl.org: 9
njabl.org: 18
spamhaus: 18
At 09:52 AM Monday, 9/27/2004, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote -=>
Hey guys, as a quick survey, if you're blocking ips at the MTA level,
which are you using?
-Dan
Ed
. . . . . . . .
I distrust
> combined.njabl.org
> list.dsbl.org
> sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
Quite successfully, I might add. I haven't had a legitimate complaint
in over 8 weeks (knock on wood), with about 55,000 SMTP connection
attempts per work day...
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> Hey guys, as a quick survey, if you're blocking ips at the MTA level, which
> are you using?
The MAPS RBL+ is our most effective blocking rule.
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/
FORTIES: WEST OR NORTHWEST 6 OR 7,
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/27/2004 12:42:20 PM:
> Agreed, comcast.net's mail servers were in sorbs big list...our customers
> didnt like that!
>
> it might be helpful to know in what capacity the servers are working
> in...ISPs, corporate, private?
>
That's why I tend
Whoops! Replied to fast. You only wanted net checks. Sorry!
>Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 13:17:39 -0500
>To: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
users@spamassassin.apache.org
>From: "Jack L. Stone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Preferred DNS
At 12:52 PM 9.27.2004 -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
>Hey guys, as a quick survey, if you're blocking ips at the MTA level,
>which are you using?
>
>-Dan
>
Sendmail's access.db/milter-regex & milter-greylist(delay, not block)
Cannot get milter-sender to work because it requires compilin
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 10:50:21AM -0700, jdow wrote:
> Recently dsbl blocked a whole Earthlink smtp server as a spam relay
> leading to, no doubt, an incredible number of false positive rejections,
> including some of my email to this list.
Generally, those using dsbl.org lists to block or rejec
This is what I use:
> : sbl.spamhaus.org
> : bl.spamcop.net
> : cbl.abuseat.org
> : http.dnsbl.sorbs.net
> : socks.dnsbl.sorbs.net
> : misc.dnsbl.sorbs.net
> : smtp.dnsbl.sorbs.net
> : web.dnsbl.sorbs.net
> : zombie.dnsbl.sorbs.net
> : dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net
> : nomail.dnsbl.sorbs.net
Use DelayCh
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> spamcop.net
> njabl.org
> spamhaus.org
> ordb.org
>
> recently took a lot of heat for using sorbs.net
As a person for whom the concept of DNS based blackholes is a little
troublesome I note it would not be wise for someone with corporate
customers to use a black hole
-0500
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Preferred DNSBL
>
>
>
>
>
> "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/27/2004
> 11:52:41 AM:
>
>> Hey guys, as a quick survey, if you're blocking ips at the MTA level,
&
a pretty good one)
>
>
>
>
> RE: Preferred DNSBL
>
> Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> > Hey guys, as a quick survey, if you're blocking ips at the MTA level,
> > which are you using?
>
>
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Hey guys, as a quick survey, if you're blocking ips at the MTA level,
which are you using?
Just one: Spamhaus SBL+XBL
--
Kelson Vibber
SpeedGate Communications
spamcop.net
njabl.org
spamhaus.org
ordb.org
recently took a lot of heat for using sorbs.net
RE: Preferred DNSBL
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> Hey guys, as a quick survey, if you're blocking ips at the MTA level,
> which are you using?
"Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/27/2004
11:52:41 AM:
> Hey guys, as a quick survey, if you're blocking ips at the MTA level,
> which are you using?
>
> -Dan
>
> --
Sorted by number of hits, the first three are by far the big hitters. Had
sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org for a
dnsbl.njabl.org
sbl.spamhaus.org
relays.ordb.org
-Original Message-
From: Barry Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27 September 2004 18:03
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Preferred DNSBL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> Hey guys, as a quick survey, if you're blocking ips at the MTA level,
> which are you using?
list.dsbl.org
sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
cn.countries.nerd.dk
- --
Regards
Barry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
spamhaus
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Mahoney, System Admin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 9:53 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Preferred DNSBL
>
>
> Hey guys, as a quick survey, if you're blocking ips at the MTA level,
> which are yo
36 matches
Mail list logo
