On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 04:25:20PM -0700, jdow wrote:
>>From the last few days:
>>
>> SURBL Hits
>> --- ---
>> URIBL_PH_SURBL3
>> URIBL_AB_SURBL5,342
>> URIBL_XS_SURBL3,529
>> URIBL_JP_SURBL 14,423
>> URIBL_SC2_SURBL 5,681
>> URIB
It sure would help to know how may of those hits were on ham vice spam.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Clay Irving" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >From the last few days:
>
> SURBL Hits
> --- ---
> URIBL_PH_SURBL3
> URIBL_AB_SURBL5,342
> UR
>From the last few days:
SURBL Hits
--- ---
URIBL_PH_SURBL3
URIBL_AB_SURBL5,342
URIBL_XS_SURBL3,529
URIBL_JP_SURBL 14,423
URIBL_SC2_SURBL 5,681
URIBL_OB_SURBL 11,742
URIBL_SC_SURBL5,097
URIBL_WS_SURBL9,931
--
Clay
>From the last three days:
SpamAssassinRuleHits for SPAM (score 10 and higher):
BAYES_99 ( 95%)
RAZOR2_CHECK ( 90%)
RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 ( 85%)
DIGEST_MULTIPLE ( 74%)
URIBL_BLACK ( 72%)
On Monday 25 July 2005 01:14 am, Jeff Chan wrote:
> Please test sc2 and the revised xs and let us know how they
> perform for you. Those with large spam and ham corpora (such as
> the SpamAssassin developers) are encouraged to test and please
> let us know.
Although I don't have a large amount o
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 08:58:30PM -0700, jdow wrote:
>> I added them yesterday, and I've had no hits. I am hitting other SURBLs:
>
> Did you restart spamd?
Yes. My "no hits" is attributed to bad analysis. :)
XS 2,698 times
JP 12,251 times
XS2 4,733 times
--
Clay Irving <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Thursday, July 28, 2005, 12:29:49 AM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
> Hi!
>> I added them yesterday, and I've had no hits. I am hitting other SURBLs:
>>
>> URIBL_AB_SURBL 1,345 times
>> URIBL_OB_SURBL 2,982 times
>> URIBL_SC_SURBL 2,564 times
>> URIBL_WS_SURBL 1,111 times
> You dont use UR
Some stats from one of our SA servers. After about two days we
had:
9076 SURBL hits
5373 SC2 hits
4813 SC hits
1148 SC2 hits that did not also hit SC
588 SC hits that did not also hit SC2
3701 XS hits
1890 SC2 hits that did not hit XS
218 XS hits that did not hit SC2
So
From: "Clay Irving" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I added them yesterday, and I've had no hits. I am hitting other SURBLs:
Did you restart spamd?
{^_^}
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 09:13:38PM -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
> That will work, but it's technically incorrect since the
> standalone lists sc2 and xs aren't bitmask-encoded, which is what
> urirhssub is intended for. Standalone lists should be used with
> urirhsbl, so correct, working rules for the
Jeff Chan wrote:
On Monday, July 25, 2005, 3:11:40 PM, Tim Litwiller wrote:
this is what it took to make it work for me
_urirhssub_ URIBL_SC2_SURBL sc2.surbl.org. A127.0.0.2
body URIBL_SC2_SURBL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_SC2_SURBL')
describe URIBL_SC2_SURBL Has URI
On Monday, July 25, 2005, 3:11:40 PM, Tim Litwiller wrote:
> this is what it took to make it work for me
> _urirhssub_ URIBL_SC2_SURBL sc2.surbl.org. A127.0.0.2
> body URIBL_SC2_SURBL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_SC2_SURBL')
> describe URIBL_SC2_SURBL Has URI in SC2 at http://www.surb
On Monday, July 25, 2005, 12:06:10 PM, jdow jdow wrote:
> From: "Jeff Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> On Monday, July 25, 2005, 12:33:08 AM, jdow jdow wrote:
>> > From: "Jeff Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > Is this correct as ammended? I added the "TXT" strings
>>
>> >> Here are SpamAssassin 3.0.1 and
jdow wrote:
From: "Jeff Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Here are SpamAssassin 3.0.1 and later configs for using these two lists:
urirhsbl URIBL_SC2_SURBL sc2.surbl.org.
body URIBL_SC2_SURBL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_SC2_SURBL')
describe URIBL_SC2_SURBL Has URI in SC2 at
From: "Jeff Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Monday, July 25, 2005, 12:33:08 AM, jdow jdow wrote:
> > From: "Jeff Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Is this correct as ammended? I added the "TXT" strings
>
> >> Here are SpamAssassin 3.0.1 and later configs for using these two
lists:
>
> Please try:
>
> u
OK the prior rules were still wrong. These will work:
urirhsbl URIBL_SC2_SURBL sc2.surbl.org. A
body URIBL_SC2_SURBL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_SC2_SURBL')
describe URIBL_SC2_SURBL Has URI in SC2 at http://www.surbl.org/lists.html
tflagsURIBL_SC2_SURBL net
score URIBL_SC2_SU
jdow wrote:
From: "Jeff Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Is this correct as ammended? I added the "TXT" strings
Here are SpamAssassin 3.0.1 and later configs for using these two lists:
urirhsbl URIBL_SC2_SURBL sc2.surbl.org. TXT
body URIBL_SC2_SURBL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_SC2_SURBL'
On Monday, July 25, 2005, 12:33:08 AM, jdow jdow wrote:
> From: "Jeff Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Is this correct as ammended? I added the "TXT" strings
>> Here are SpamAssassin 3.0.1 and later configs for using these two lists:
Please try:
urirhsbl URIBL_SC2_SURBL sc2.surbl.org. A127.0.
From: "Jeff Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Is this correct as ammended? I added the "TXT" strings
> Here are SpamAssassin 3.0.1 and later configs for using these two lists:
>
urirhsbl URIBL_SC2_SURBL sc2.surbl.org. TXT
body URIBL_SC2_SURBL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_SC2_SURBL')
describe URI
From: "Jeff Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Here are SpamAssassin 3.0.1 and later configs for using these two lists:
>
> urirhsbl URIBL_SC2_SURBL sc2.surbl.org.
> body URIBL_SC2_SURBL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_SC2_SURBL')
> describe URIBL_SC2_SURBL Has URI in SC2 at
http://www.surbl.org/lis
20 matches
Mail list logo
