On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 14:47, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
> > In fact, I cannot see anything in the headers that leads me to believe that
> > SURBL is being used/enforced.
>
> Do you have Net::DNS installed ? It looks to me you are not using RBL
> checks at all?
And make sure you're running a rece
On Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 3:31:22 PM, Nick Stephens wrote:
NS>> Raymond Dijkxhoorn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) RD wrote today:
>> Do you have Net::DNS installed ? It looks to me you are not using RBL checks
>> at all?
> I checked my perllocal.pod and saw no reference to NET::DNS on this box,
>
At 05:44 PM 9/29/2004, Nick Stephens wrote:
I've looked at a few spams that I have received today, and compared the
URL's found in them with those listed on SURBL+ Checker. Even though some
of the domains are listed in those lists (eg, URIBL: multi.surbl.org:
listed [Blocked, sectility8symposia
Hi!
I looked thru the mailing list archives and read a few emails that stated
that in 3.0.0 SURBL (specifically, multi) was automatically
installed/invoked, however I am not seeing this in the headers when spam is
processed.
I've looked at a few spams that I have received today, and compared th
