Re: Telling BAYES not to learn?

2013-02-14 Thread Benny Pedersen
Martin Gregorie skrev den 2013-02-11 16:41: Maybe there's a case for classifying mail as ham/spam by reading the raw mail instead of looking at it with an MUA and being shown the HTML part? why is it needed ?, if mua clients dont trust html, then use text mode mua, problem is gone well it

Re: Telling BAYES not to learn?

2013-02-14 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 13:18 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote: Martin Gregorie skrev den 2013-02-11 16:41: Maybe there's a case for classifying mail as ham/spam by reading the raw mail instead of looking at it with an MUA and being shown the HTML part? why is it needed ?, if mua clients

Re: Telling BAYES not to learn?

2013-02-11 Thread Benny Pedersen
Den 07-02-2013 17:13, Marc Perkel skrev: Because when a message uses invisible text to poison bayes then I don't want to learn that because it will make bayes less effective. that still does not make sense, if you say an hidded word is spam then its spam, no matter if both background and

Re: Telling BAYES not to learn?

2013-02-11 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 16:00 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote: Den 07-02-2013 17:13, Marc Perkel skrev: Because when a message uses invisible text to poison bayes then I don't want to learn that because it will make bayes less effective. that still does not make sense, if you say an hidded word

Re: Telling BAYES not to learn?

2013-02-08 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On Tue, 05 Feb 2013 07:20:24 -0800 Marc Perkel wrote: is there a way I can put something in a rule that would cause bayes not to learn - such as a rule that detects bayes poisoning? On 2/7/2013 6:58 AM, RW wrote: Why do you think this is a good idea? On 07.02.13 08:13, Marc Perkel wrote:

Re: Telling BAYES not to learn?

2013-02-07 Thread RW
On Tue, 05 Feb 2013 07:20:24 -0800 Marc Perkel wrote: is there a way I can put something in a rule that would cause bayes not to learn - such as a rule that detects bayes poisoning? Why do you think this is a good idea?

Re: Telling BAYES not to learn?

2013-02-07 Thread Marc Perkel
On 2/7/2013 6:58 AM, RW wrote: On Tue, 05 Feb 2013 07:20:24 -0800 Marc Perkel wrote: is there a way I can put something in a rule that would cause bayes not to learn - such as a rule that detects bayes poisoning? Why do you think this is a good idea? Because when a message uses invisible

Re: Telling BAYES not to learn?

2013-02-07 Thread RW
On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 08:13:54 -0800 Marc Perkel wrote: On 2/7/2013 6:58 AM, RW wrote: On Tue, 05 Feb 2013 07:20:24 -0800 Marc Perkel wrote: is there a way I can put something in a rule that would cause bayes not to learn - such as a rule that detects bayes poisoning? Why do you

Re: Telling BAYES not to learn?

2013-02-07 Thread Ben Johnson
On 2/7/2013 11:13 AM, Marc Perkel wrote: On 2/7/2013 6:58 AM, RW wrote: On Tue, 05 Feb 2013 07:20:24 -0800 Marc Perkel wrote: is there a way I can put something in a rule that would cause bayes not to learn - such as a rule that detects bayes poisoning? Why do you think this is a good

Telling BAYES not to learn?

2013-02-05 Thread Marc Perkel
is there a way I can put something in a rule that would cause bayes not to learn - such as a rule that detects bayes poisoning? -- Marc Perkel - Sales/Support supp...@junkemailfilter.com http://www.junkemailfilter.com Junk Email Filter dot com 415-992-3400

Re: Telling BAYES not to learn?

2013-02-05 Thread John Wilcock
Le 05/02/2013 16:20, Marc Perkel a écrit : is there a way I can put something in a rule that would cause bayes not to learn - such as a rule that detects bayes poisoning? Yep - tflags RULENAME noautolearn John. -- -- Over 5000 webcams from ski resorts around the world - www.snoweye.com --

Re: Telling BAYES not to learn?

2013-02-05 Thread Bowie Bailey
On 2/5/2013 10:23 AM, John Wilcock wrote: Le 05/02/2013 16:20, Marc Perkel a écrit : is there a way I can put something in a rule that would cause bayes not to learn - such as a rule that detects bayes poisoning? Yep - tflags RULENAME noautolearn That just tells SA to ignore this rule when

Re: Telling BAYES not to learn?

2013-02-05 Thread Axb
On 02/05/2013 04:20 PM, Marc Perkel wrote: is there a way I can put something in a rule that would cause bayes not to learn - such as a rule that detects bayes poisoning? What causes bayes poisoning? (except bad custom high scored rules)

Re: Telling BAYES not to learn?

2013-02-05 Thread Benny Pedersen
Marc Perkel skrev den 2013-02-05 16:20: is there a way I can put something in a rule that would cause bayes not to learn - such as a rule that detects bayes poisoning? tflags foo-rule noautolearn

Re: Telling BAYES not to learn?

2013-02-05 Thread Benny Pedersen
Axb skrev den 2013-02-05 16:30: On 02/05/2013 04:20 PM, Marc Perkel wrote: is there a way I can put something in a rule that would cause bayes not to learn - such as a rule that detects bayes poisoning? What causes bayes poisoning? (except bad custom high scored rules) +1 worst case is