On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 08:13:54 -0800 Marc Perkel wrote: > > On 2/7/2013 6:58 AM, RW wrote: > > On Tue, 05 Feb 2013 07:20:24 -0800 > > Marc Perkel wrote: > > > >> is there a way I can put something in a rule that would cause bayes > >> not to learn - such as a rule that detects bayes poisoning? > > Why do you think this is a good idea? > > > > > Because when a message uses invisible text to poison bayes then I > don't want to learn that because it will make bayes less effective.
But those emails are still going to be scanned by Bayes. If a word is being commonly added by spammers there's no point in pretending that it's still a strong ham indicator, such tokens need to be learned as spam so they get detuned and drop-out of the final calculation.
