esult: line for doing statistics
per user/domain... Maybe this is something that has to wait until 3.1
Dallas
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Yette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 2:21 PM
> To: Dallas L. Engelken
> Subject: RE: gen
5-356-0597 (f)
> AIM/Yahoo: MAPolceNOC
> MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Yette
> Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 8:24 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: generating rule stats from spamd logs
>
>
> I'd be able
riday, July 29, 2005 8:24 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: generating rule stats from spamd logs
I'd be able to code it in myself but I'm not fluent in perl (PHP guy)
and of course, the string parsing functions confuse the hell out of me.
LOL. Thought that there might b
sin.apache.org
Subject: RE: generating rule stats from spamd logs
Is there any way to modify this code to accept another command-line
argument for domain-specific? Meaning, I want to look for all rule hits
for mail destined for domain.com?
--
Matthew Yette
Senior Engineer - NOC/Operations
MA Polce C
(f)
AIM/Yahoo: MAPolceNOC
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Dallas L. Engelken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 1:02 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: generating rule stats from spamd logs
My mistake.. It is fixed, hopefully for good
; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: generating rule stats from spamd logs
He only fixed the spam rules section.
The TOP HAM RULES sections still has these two incorrect
computations...
my $perc2=sprintf("%.2f",($HAM_
las L. Engelken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/27/2005 11:26:54 AM: > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Thielen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 11:02 AM > > To: Dallas L. Engelken > > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.
ssassin.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: generating rule stats from spamd logs
> >
> > Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
> >
> > >BAYES_00 hits 15.27 of spam on yours, the %ofspam on top
ham
> > rules and
> > >%ofham on top spam rules must be buggy.
> > &g
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Thielen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 11:02 AM
> To: Dallas L. Engelken
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: generating rule stats from spamd logs
>
> Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
>
M> 10BAYES_9915351 4.46% 45.42% 60.57%
M> 19BAYES_50 6443 1.87% 19.06% 25.42%
M> 31BAYES_80 1154 0.34% 3.41% 4.55%
M> 32BAYES_60 1147 0.33% 3.39% 4.53%
M>
Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
BAYES_00 hits 15.27 of spam on yours, the %ofspam on top ham rules and
%ofham on top spam rules must be buggy.
i'm not running that version with the 5th column. It must be buggy.
i play with it after bit.
Dallas
Dallas,
Did you see the patch I sent to the SA
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 10:44 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: generating rule stats from spamd logs
> > > > > Another Dallas miracle!
> > > >
> >
> > > > > Another Dallas miracle!
> > > >
> > > > Oh? Er, how does it determine if a message was ham
or spam?
> > > It "looks like"
> > > > it is rather random based on the reports. BAYES_99
may well
> > > hit on 84.33%
> > > > of spam. But I doubt, given it's score, it hits on
44.53% of ham.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 9:59 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; jdow
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: generating rule stats from spamd logs
>
>
>
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 7:15 PM
> To: jdow
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: generating rule stats from spamd logs
>
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
From: "Justin Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> jdow writes:
> > From: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > Do you mean this script?
> > >
> > > http://www.rulesemporium.com/programs/sa-stats.txt
> > >
> > > Note: It may be named the same a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jdow writes:
> From: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Do you mean this script?
> >
> > http://www.rulesemporium.com/programs/sa-stats.txt
> >
> > Note: It may be named the same as sa-stats.pl, but it is different. Per
> > rule based.
> >
>
From: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Do you mean this script?
>
> http://www.rulesemporium.com/programs/sa-stats.txt
>
> Note: It may be named the same as sa-stats.pl, but it is different. Per
rule
> based.
>
> Another Dallas miracle!
Oh? Er, how does it determine if a message was ham or
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Sprickman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 10:46 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: generating rule stats from spamd logs
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Anyone aware of anything that can parse
Hi,
Anyone aware of anything that can parse a day's spamd logs and then give a
summary of total hits per rule? I noticed since 3.0.x that all rule hits
are in the logs now:
Jul 25 22:44:49 spamd2 spamd[59436]: result: Y 14 -
BAYES_60,DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,URIBL_BLACK,URIBL_
20 matches
Mail list logo
