Thanks for the help Jesse. Actually, soon after I sent the last email I
realized that (I've been working way too much). Thanks for the help
though. I really appreciate it. My tests just passed so I'm going to go
commit now. :)
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 16:41 -0400, Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
> Sure, the Enh
Sure, the EnhancementOperation stuff isn't always immediately easy to grok.
This particular class generically extends any existing renderComponent
method (if it exists), adding in logic to do other thingsYou could use
the same approach to do what you want.
There's a lot going on in there tha
Okay, so I'm working on this again and just by looking at the other
annotation workers it looks like there aren't any that do anything to
non-abstract methods. My annotation works on methods which have an
implementation. Is there any way to work with a method that is
non-abstract using the tapestry
classes. I've attached what
I
> > have so
> > > > > > > far and I would greatly appreciated it if someone could give
me
> > some
> > > > > > > suggestions on what to do. My big problem is:
> > > > > > >
>
ve attached what I
> > have so
> > > > > > > far and I would greatly appreciated it if someone could give me
> > some
> > > > > > > suggestions on what to do. My big problem is:
> > > > > > >
> > > >
as cache-able
already?
> > > >
> > > > On 5/25/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Have you looked into AspectJ?
> > > > >
> > > > > -Original Message-
> >
gt; > >
> > > On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 10:28 -0400, Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
> > > > Doesn't tapestry support marking a parameter as cache-able already?
> > > >
> > > > On 5/25/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > >
your build environment. But, this is a perfect case for AspectJ, IMHO.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 10:39 AM
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: RE: Help in writing a custom annotation
>
> I though
pport marking a parameter as cache-able already?
> > >
> > > On 5/25/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Have you looked into AspectJ?
> > > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Dan
ked into AspectJ?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 10:00 AM
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: RE: Help in writing a custom annotation
>
> Okay, my annotation is called @Once and if put on accessor will mak
EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Have you looked into AspectJ?
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dan Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 10:00 AM
> > To: Tapestry users
> > Subject: RE: Help in writing a cust
-Original Message-
> From: Dan Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 10:00 AM
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: RE: Help in writing a custom annotation
>
> Okay, my annotation is called @Once and if put on accessor will make
> sure that the method is o
ameter as cache-able already?
>
> On 5/25/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Have you looked into AspectJ?
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dan Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 10:00 AM
> > To
the one that injects messages, or beans, or even the one
that
I
> wrote for "autowiring" (available in SVN on the 4.1 branch).
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 10:44 PM
> To: Tapestry users
> Sub
Have you looked into AspectJ?
-Original Message-
From: Dan Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 10:00 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: RE: Help in writing a custom annotation
Okay, my annotation is called @Once and if put on accessor will make
sure that the method
r even the one that I
> wrote for "autowiring" (available in SVN on the 4.1 branch).
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 10:44 PM
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: Help in writing a custom annotation
I'd look at the one that injects messages, or beans, or even the one that I
wrote for "autowiring" (available in SVN on the 4.1 branch).
-Original Message-
From: Dan Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 10:44 PM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: He
I want to write an annotation that will intercept a method and add a
property to the class. I've started digging around in some of the
annotation sources but it's going pretty slow. Can someone point me at
the right place to look for where to start?
--
Dan Adams
Software Engineer
Interactive Fact
18 matches
Mail list logo