Hi,
I don't see any "complexity of EJBs (in EJB 2)" in case if you are
using just JMS/Session beans - Entity beans are really awful
2008/2/5, Renat Zubairov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Angelo,
>
> I was just thinking how can you organize your application in case you would
> use the EJBs:
>
> You wil
Hi Angelo,
I was just thinking how can you organize your application in case you would
use the EJBs:
You will most probably use the Session Facade design pattern (
http://java.sun.com/blueprints/corej2eepatterns/Patterns/SessionFacade.html)
to provide the backend for your web apps that will be sh
It makes Hibernate working as Jboss MBean service,
this service is responsible for working with Hibernate sessions.
This way leaves you only with JBoss, without any alternative.
2008/2/4, Jonathan Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Angelo,
>
> Take a look at JBoss .har files. I've never tried it but i
Angelo,
Take a look at JBoss .har files. I've never tried it but it might be a way
to share a common Hibernate setup among multiple webapps.
Jonathan
> -Original Message-
> From: Angelo Chen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2008 8:28 PM
> To: users@tapestry.apache.
Hi Renat,
I think your recommendation of j2ee and ear deployment is a better option, i
think again, there is really no need to make the multiple module looks like
one, we can have multiple web applications, now this T5 IOC inside EJB part
without EJB is interesting, what's the advantage of this
Hi Angelo,
Basically if you have a number of web application, Tap or not Tap :) there
are number of problems you need to solve if you want them to look as one
application for the user:
1. Authentication - in case you would use propreitary authentication schemes
that are based on the HTTP sessions
Using one persistence layer (I'll talk about Hibernate, but it most
likely applies to any other)
for more than one web-app is a bit tricky.
Simpler part is creating subclasses of TapestryFilter
one that loads hibernate and shares it via ServletContext
one that loads Tapestry without hibernate an
Hi Renat,
EJB is not a must, any suggestions for this kind of app as long as front end
is Tapestry 5.
Renat Zubairov wrote:
>
> Hello Angelo,
>
> Main question is do you want to use EJB in your app or not, because
> usually
> there is no proper way to share state between multiple WAR's deplo
Hello Angelo,
Main question is do you want to use EJB in your app or not, because usually
there is no proper way to share state between multiple WAR's deployed inside
the application container.
Renat
On 04/02/2008, Angelo Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
> A mini ERP project which will