Uhm .. yes, that may add complexity to the build-process but will keep
tapestry cleaner.
I'll try that, thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Tapestry-and-CDI-the-need-for-tp4876507p4877038.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archi
.
>
> By using the registry, i think i'm doing 2-3 more steps than just using the
> tapestry.execution variable.
>
> Is there a way to handle this without the tapestry.execution logic ?
>
> Thanks !
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://tapest
ks !
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Tapestry-and-CDI-the-need-for-tp4876507p4876947.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 11:24:39 -0300, josete wrote:
Hi guys !
Hi!
I do need some behaviour in Tapestry already available to me via CDI in a
non-web Application.
I guess you're talking about Tapestry-IoC, not Tapestry (which is the web
framework).
Let me explain myself :
I have a produc
No, wrong path .. any help ?
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Tapestry-and-CDI-the-need-for-tp4876507p4876655.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To
Uhm .. looks like i can use
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TAPESTRY/Configuration#Configuration-SettingExecutionModes
Configuration-SettingExecutionModes
Let's check .. any better idea ?
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Tapestry-and-CD
achieve
it.
May any of you help me with this ? I do not need any runtime behaviour, just
compile time.
Thanks everyone, and long life to Tapestry ! ( So to Howard and all the
maintainers, of course :) )
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Tapestry-and-CDI
