Re: DZone's 40th Refcardz, Apache Tapestry 5.0

2009-02-05 Thread Michael Gerzabek
Awesome! Thank you Howard! Lewis Ship schrieb: DZone Refcardz are a series of free cheat sheets for developers, written by book authors and industry experts on a wide range of technical topics including: Spring, Windows PowerShell, EJB 3, Ajax, Design Patterns,

Re: DZone's 40th Refcardz, Apache Tapestry 5.0

2009-02-05 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
Yes, they may switch it over to the Alexander's book. On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Kevin Menard wrote: > Looks pretty good. Although, I'm a bit baffled by the TiA plug. It > is a bit antiquated now. > > -- > Kevin > > > > On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: >> >> DZon

Re: DZone's 40th Refcardz, Apache Tapestry 5.0

2009-02-05 Thread Kevin Menard
Looks pretty good. Although, I'm a bit baffled by the TiA plug. It is a bit antiquated now. -- Kevin On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > > DZone Refcardz are a series of free cheat sheets for developers, written by > book authors and industry experts on a wide range

Re: DZone's 40th Refcardz, Apache Tapestry 5.0

2009-02-05 Thread Francois Armand
Howard Lewis Ship wrote: DZone Refcardz are a series of free cheat sheets for developers, written by book authors and industry experts on a wide range of technical topics including: Spring, Windows PowerShell, EJB 3, Ajax, Design Patterns, Silverlight 2 and many m

Re: Is it possible to use Property Files with HTML tags in Tapestry 5.0

2009-01-06 Thread hemen
nds, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-use-Property-Files-with-HTML-tags-in-Tapestry-5.0-tp21308001p21308555.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -

Re: Is it possible to use Property Files with HTML tags in Tapestry 5.0

2009-01-06 Thread Francois Armand
hemen wrote: It will print the "hi this is demo property file.. please refer Home". --- As whole String with HTML tags HTML parsing is not done In fact, Tapestry escaped the armful characters to avoid any damaging side effects. If you actually want to output your string as it is, yo

Is it possible to use Property Files with HTML tags in Tapestry 5.0

2009-01-06 Thread hemen
tring with HTML tags HTML parsing is not done Please suggest me Thanks, Hemen -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-use-Property-Files-with-HTML-tags-in-Tapestry-5.0-tp21308001p21308001.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at

Re: Tapestry 5.0 Final Release - 5.0.18

2008-12-16 Thread Igor Drobiazko
Howard, why don't you post this annoncement at TSS and/or InfoQ? The whole world should know that competitor frameworks will die hard :) On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 7:52 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > Apache Tapestry 5.0 final release (5.0.18) > > After nearly three years of developm

Re: Tapestry 5.0 Final Release - 5.0.18

2008-12-15 Thread Borut Bolčina
Great news! Knowing this framework is in production use for months now, is there a list of success stories? I think Howard once asked on this list for such stories and the format in which they should be "reported". Cheers, Borut

Re: Tapestry 5.0 Final Release - 5.0.18

2008-12-15 Thread Stephane Decleire
Congratulations Howard and all contributors for making our lives as web developpers, architects, project managers, ... easier ! Best Regards Stephane Howard Lewis Ship a écrit : > Apache Tapestry 5.0 final release (5.0.18) > > After nearly three years of development, the final release

Re: Tapestry 5.0 Final Release - 5.0.18

2008-12-15 Thread Massimo Lusetti
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Olle Hallin wrote: > Congrats Howard (and others who have contributed)! Yep, congratulation Howard, you did an amazing job! > Just a naming question: wouldn't it be appropriate to name the release > version something in line with 5.0.GA? > It will clarify the r

Re: Tapestry 5.0 Final Release - 5.0.18

2008-12-15 Thread Olle Hallin
s. But that's also > true for any other framework out in space. > > Special thanks also to the list for coaching people on the usage of T5. > This is a big help in acquiring the knowledge to use T5 effectively. > > Michael > > Howard Lewis Ship schrieb: > > Apache

Re: Tapestry 5.0 Final Release - 5.0.18

2008-12-15 Thread Michael Gerzabek
t in space. Special thanks also to the list for coaching people on the usage of T5. This is a big help in acquiring the knowledge to use T5 effectively. Michael Howard Lewis Ship schrieb: Apache Tapestry 5.0 final release (5.0.18) After nearly three years of development, the final release

Re: Tapestry 5.0 Final Release - 5.0.18

2008-12-14 Thread Christian Edward Gruber
/email.html for important additional terms relating to this e-mail. - Original Message - From: "Angelo Chen" To: users@tapestry.apache.org Sent: Saturday, 13 December, 2008 2:15:47 AM GMT +02:00 Athens, Beirut, Bucharest, Istanbul Subject: Re: Tapestry 5.0 Final Releas

Re: Tapestry 5.0 Final Release - 5.0.18

2008-12-14 Thread Peter Stavrinides
://www.albourne.com/email.html for important additional terms relating to this e-mail. - Original Message - From: "Angelo Chen" To: users@tapestry.apache.org Sent: Saturday, 13 December, 2008 2:15:47 AM GMT +02:00 Athens, Beirut, Bucharest, Istanbul Subject: Re: Tapestry 5.0 Final Releas

Re: Tapestry 5.0 Final Release - 5.0.18

2008-12-12 Thread Angelo Chen
good news, we finally hava final release:) do we have to do any changes to the pom.xml? or just like before, simply update the version number? Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > > Apache Tapestry 5.0 final release (5.0.18) > > * Via Maven: > > > org.apache.tape

Re: Tapestry 5.0 Final Release - 5.0.18

2008-12-12 Thread Geoff Callender
My congratulations to Howard and everyone else on the team. Tapestry 5.0 is an absolutely magnificent piece of work. Regards, Geoff Callender On 13/12/2008, at 7:53 AM, Martijn Brinkers wrote: Hi Howard, Congratulations with the final release. Tapestry is awsome! Best regards, Martijn

Re: Tapestry 5.0 Final Release - 5.0.18

2008-12-12 Thread Martijn Brinkers
Hi Howard, Congratulations with the final release. Tapestry is awsome! Best regards, Martijn Brinkers On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 10:52 -0800, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > Apache Tapestry 5.0 final release (5.0.18) > > After nearly three years of development, the final release of Apache &

Tapestry 5.0 Final Release - 5.0.18

2008-12-12 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
Apache Tapestry 5.0 final release (5.0.18) After nearly three years of development, the final release of Apache Tapestry 5.0 is now available for download. Apache Tapestry 5 is a total rewrite of the Tapestry web application framework, bringing forward Tapestry's core concepts: reu

Re: Re: JSR-168/268 support and Tapestry 5.0

2006-12-30 Thread Kristian Marinkovic
hi konstantin,IMHO portlets are going to get more and more important. if you lookat the new portlets 2.0 spec you will see AJAX defined to reload portletcontent, an event mechanism to notify one or more portlets, a new interportlet communication protocol, central session handling aso. With this spe

Re: JSR-168/268 support and Tapestry 5.0

2006-12-29 Thread Konstantin Ignatyev
does it make sense at all to support portals? Does people still use and develop portals? I mean that with the AJAX proliferation it looks like "Clientlets" make much more sense than Portlets and therefore Portals in a sense of JSR-168 are headed to oblivion. What is the peoples' experience and o

Re: JSR-168/268 support and Tapestry 5.0

2006-12-29 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
That should be "action" requests and "render" requests. The fact that servlet Tapestry 5 differentiates between the two will make it easier, or at least make it more consistent, for portlet Tapestry 5. On 12/29/06, Jan Vissers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From Howard: "T5 should have similar po

Re: JSR-168/268 support and Tapestry 5.0

2006-12-29 Thread Jan Vissers
From Howard: "T5 should have similar portlet support to what's in T4. In fact, I've let portlets influence a major aspect of Tapestry: as with portlets, there are distinct "action" requests and "portlet" requests. However, my priority is to get servlet support working, so I can't commit to w

JSR-168/268 support and Tapestry 5.0

2006-12-27 Thread Jan Vissers
Will T5.0 provide continued support for JSR-168. And how about JSR-268? Thanks, Jan. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: tapestry 5.0

2006-12-16 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
So far, whenever I've added some interesting functionality. On 12/15/06, Massimo Lusetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 12/15/06, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What's going on is that Tapestry is in a snapshot stage, where we don't have > official releases published to the cent

Re: tapestry 5.0

2006-12-15 Thread Massimo Lusetti
On 12/15/06, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What's going on is that Tapestry is in a snapshot stage, where we don't have official releases published to the central Maven repository, but do have -SNAPSHOT releases (a concept within Maven) published to a public repository at Apache.

Re: tapestry 5.0

2006-12-14 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
rom pom.xml for > tapestry-project > > to pom.xml in my new project, but that did not help. Any suggestions? > > > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/tapestry-5.0-tf2818273.html#a7867368 > Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archi

Re: tapestry 5.0

2006-12-14 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
t from svn with out a > problem. Even tried copying dependencies from pom.xml for tapestry-project > to pom.xml in my new project, but that did not help. Any suggestions? > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/tapestry-5.0-tf2818273.html#a7867368 Sent from the Tap

Re: tapestry 5.0

2006-12-13 Thread bueggers
; tapestry-core, tapestry-ioc and tapestry-project from svn with out a > problem. Even tried copying dependencies from pom.xml for tapestry-project > to pom.xml in my new project, but that did not help. Any suggestions? > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.c

tapestry 5.0

2006-12-13 Thread tom . burt
Trying to recreate example from screen cast 1. When I list possible dependencies in Maven, I do not get tapestry-core as a possibility. I do get tapestry-ioc and tapestry-project. I have been able to download tapestry-core, tapestry-ioc and tapestry-project from svn with out a problem. Even trie

Re: Question about Tapestry 5.0

2006-11-22 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
Tapestry 5 performance has been really good, for the trival demo apps I've put together so far. Tapestry 4 could probably be optimized a bit more; for example, it uses a lot of StringBuffers which are pretty slow. The overhead of the DOM is not so great, and there will be a lot of room to optimi

Re: Question about Tapestry 5.0

2006-11-21 Thread Galam
I am excited about the new concepts in Tapestry 5, when will it available for? On 11/7/06, Vinicius Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello there! It's been a while since my last post, I tried to catch up, but after reading over 500 topics I gave up ;). I was checking Tapestry 5 site (Wow i

Re: RE: Question about Tapestry 5.0

2006-11-21 Thread Robin Ericsson
On 11/21/06, Payne, Matthew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Given that 4.1 will not be out till spring 2007. Count on 2 or more years. Though I hope I'm wrong. Tapestry 4.1 != Tapestry 5, it's not even the same codebase. Think of them as two different frameworks that looks very similar and have the

Question about Tapestry 5.0

2006-11-07 Thread Vinicius Carvalho
Hello there! It's been a while since my last post, I tried to catch up, but after reading over 500 topics I gave up ;). I was checking Tapestry 5 site (Wow it changed so much that I could not even recognize it as Tapestry ;) ). One thing that intrigues me is the use of DOM from the MarkupWriter.