Hi!
> For all poor souls that may run into this problem here is a sanity
> check to consider.
>
> Attempt to run the following URL:
> http://yourmachinename[:port]/appRoot/resources/org.apache.wicket.ajax.WicketAjaxReference/wicket-ajax.js
Interesting. It might be related to:
http://apache-wicke
Thanks Dave, that's a good advice.
Just out of curiosity: what did go wrong with your deployment?
Best,
Sven
On 25.06.2011 04:26, D D wrote:
For all poor souls that may run into this problem here is a sanity
check to consider.
Attempt to run the following URL:
http://yourmachinename[:port]/ap
The Wicket Team is proud to introduce the fifth Release Candidate in
Wicket 1.5 series. It includes bug fixes and improvements reported
against 1.5-RC4.2. See the changelog for full list.
More detailed migration notes are available on our [Migrate to 1.5
Wiki Page](https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/
For all poor souls that may run into this problem here is a sanity
check to consider.
Attempt to run the following URL:
http://yourmachinename[:port]/appRoot/resources/org.apache.wicket.ajax.WicketAjaxReference/wicket-ajax.js
Your browser should attempt downloading a file (in case of IE6 -
that's
in 1.5 you can use getMarkup() and you can move your code to onMarkupAttached()
-igor
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I want to add some components to the hierarchy dynamically based on the
> wicket:id presents in the HTML.
>
> Basically, I want to
Hi!
It will probably cost you quite some time but you can debug the order
of js library references being loaded in various situations.
Wicket is a javascript reference to the wicket js methods and if
"Wicket" is undefined it means it is not loaded at that time... for
some reason.
**
Martin
201
Hi!
I want to add some components to the hierarchy dynamically based on the
wicket:id presents in the HTML.
Basically, I want to check if an used wicket:id was not explicitly added
(with add method) by the user and then (in some cases) add it.
But I'm having trouble to do that. I tried with
Hello,
We have an issue where IE6 loads and works fine with wicket's js
during development. As soon as we moved app to "community" server IE6
comes up with an error:
"Error: 'Wicket' is undefined
As much as we would wish to get off IE6 we have to stick with it for a
little longer. I've seen peop
It seems like an "instanceof String" followed by downcasts and
String#compareToIgnoreCase should do the trick.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:30 AM, pragya.rawal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a DataView and I am sorting data column (on click of column header)
> inside it using my custom SortableTaskDataPro
Hi,
take a look at the fantastic :-) free chapter from Wicket Cookbook. It's
about what are you doing with tables.
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CC8QFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.packtpub.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2F1605OS-Chapter-5-Displaying-Data-Using-DataTable.pdf&ei=
Hi,
I'd recommend to preserve the old reponse, use StrintResponse
temporarily, and at the end in finally{} restore the original
response.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Marco wrote:
> I need a second opinion about using Wickets template capabilities to send
> HTML emails from a Wicket web app
Hi,
I have a requirement wherein I want to filter data in a DataView.
I want a Microsoft Excel type filter wherein we select filter on a
column(header) and it displays all the values in the column in a dropdown.
Then I should select some value from that dropdown and I should get the data
filtered
Hi,
I have a DataView and I am sorting data column (on click of column header)
inside it using my custom SortableTaskDataProvider which extends
SortableDataProvider.
So, I pass the property name (column) and DataView (list) and I get the list
sorted on the basis of property.
So, as per the defau
I need a second opinion about using Wickets template capabilities to send
HTML emails from a Wicket web application.
Situation:
I create an instance of a WebPage which must rendered to a String. This
String is then passed to JavaMail as payload of an email.
The email is created and sent after sub
Looks simpler solution. If it works OK then we can commit it in SVN.
You are right, wicket-bundle just combines -util.jar, -request.jar and
-core.jar into one.
We can create a new wicket-osgi project in wicketstuff that will
provide the integration code, like OsgiClassResolver and whatever else
is
wicket-bundle appears to be simply using assembly plugin to mash all the jars
together.
I haven't tested it yet, but I believe
https://github.com/topping/wicket/commit/b120bdd4e6b7b085f2644aab1f77b3d40558c967
is a better solution.
Haven't found OsgiClassResolver yet, but it's late here and I
OsgiClassResolver will be in wicket-bundle.jar (the one in wicketstuff).
The user application will use it by:
MyApp#init() {
super.init();
getApplicationSettings.setClassResolver(new OsgiClassResolver());
}
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Brian Topping wrote:
> If by that you mean Wicket
If by that you mean Wicket would be injected with something like the system
classloader or wicket's classloader, it kind of breaks modularity. How would
one upgrade wicket itself? There's no limitation to doing so, the new Wicket
bundle can have dependencies in parallel with the old wicket bun
Wicket has org.apache.wicket.application.IClassResolver.
The mentioned ticket earlier has OsgiClassResolver impl
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:39 AM, David Leangen wrote:
>
> IIUC, other frameworks allow for the injection of a classloader. Wouldn't
> that be enough?
>
> We could then package an opt
On Jun 23, 2011, at 11:09 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> This sounds like the problem solved with
> http://www.tomcatexpert.com/blog/2011/05/31/parallel-deployment-tomcat-7
Kind of assumes one is using Tomcat and not one of the other ways to deploy a
web application with OSGi. :-)
--
IIUC, other frameworks allow for the injection of a classloader. Wouldn't that
be enough?
We could then package an optional classloader just for that purpose.
Cheers,
=David
On Jun 24, 2011, at 4:34 PM, Brian Topping wrote:
> It seems that Wicket should not be burdened with this tracking t
It seems that Wicket should not be burdened with this tracking that is only
used in OSGi configurations. Another issue is that an admin will use OSGi
interfaces to swap out bundles, not wicket interfaces. OSGi is going to use
the BundleActivator of the component bundle to stop it, and it won't
Hey seb ,
thanks for the quick fix !
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:01 AM, Sebastian wrote:
> hi vineet,
>
> you are right. this is probably a left over from the refactoring we did. I
> just fixed it on github.
>
> regards,
>
> seb
>
> On 23.06.2011 22:58, vineet semwal wrote:
>>
>> hellos !
>>
>> i
23 matches
Mail list logo