What we're seeing is that our network and RAID 5 IDE-based disk array on
our central mail store server is not able to keep up with the 'client'
servers doing the POP3, IMAP, Webmail, and SMTP legwork.
I've found an interesting bottleneck with webmail. When people use
POP or IMAP clients
Hi,
I run vpopmail with mysql backend, and have a web front-end to admin
stuff.
The creation and drop of accounts works accessing the mysql table. The
creation of accounts works ok, but when I delete a user in the mysql
table and create it again, it can't log in. Imap tells login failed but
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:16:02 -0700, Jay Tortorelli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll chime in a say that I have had great success setting up
Qmail/Vpopmail/etc that stores on an nfs mount from a two machine mirror
using drbd/heartbeat to provide mirroring and failover.
http://www.drbd.org/
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Monday 05 July 2004 08:44 pm, Eduardo M. Bragatto wrote:
What happens in the case that more than one RBL has the same blocked
address? Which one actually blocks the smtp session? The one that
answers first, or rblsmtpd waits until one to respond, before asking to
At 07:14 AM 7/6/2004, Eduardo M. Bragatto wrote:
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Monday 05 July 2004 08:44 pm, Eduardo M. Bragatto wrote:
What happens in the case that more than one RBL has the same
blocked
address? Which one actually blocks the smtp session? The one that
answers first, or
Eric Ziegast wrote:
What we're seeing is that our network and RAID 5 IDE-based disk array on
our central mail store server is not able to keep up with the 'client'
servers doing the POP3, IMAP, Webmail, and SMTP legwork.
I've found an interesting bottleneck with webmail. When people use
POP or
On Mon, 5 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Before we take this costly step, what have you noticed for user / system
loads before you start hitting the limits of your hardware? Should we be
having these issues with about 15,000 email users and 5 front-end 'work'
servers?
Well, you're making
Rainer Duffner wrote:
Eric Ziegast wrote:
What we're seeing is that our network and RAID 5 IDE-based disk array on
our central mail store server is not able to keep up with the 'client'
servers doing the POP3, IMAP, Webmail, and SMTP legwork.
I've found an interesting bottleneck with webmail.
Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-vpopmaild will be nice - no need to have webmail on the same box
vpopmaild has nothing to do with webmail, although I guess you could use
it to retrieve mail through the back door. I'd suggest IMAP or POP3
based webmail
On Mon, 5 Jul 2004, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
Also, on top of that, I would consider disabling auth logging as it performs
an insert/update upon every authentication which, no matter what will go back
to your central mysql server, and if you have mysql being replicated, will be
replicated to the
On Mon, 5 Jul 2004, Eric Ziegast wrote:
With webmail, the session state is not saved nor cached, so with each
new request, the mailbox can be rescanned. A relatively modest webmail
application might only rescan all headers and show subject lines. A
complex application might scan all
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Rick Widmer wrote:
Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-vpopmaild will be nice - no need to have webmail on the same box
vpopmaild has nothing to do with webmail, although I guess you could use
it to retrieve mail through the back
Hi,
I believe there was some discussion about this some time ago, but recent
events have made me think of this again...
The standard chkuser patch that vpopmail uses (see Bill Shupp's update
to the original: http://www.shupp.org/patches/chkuser-0.6.mysql.patch) has
some rather nasty behaviours.
Charles Sprickman wrote:
I'm also wondering if there are any plans for the vpopmail stuff to
support talking to multiple databases; ie: if no answer or timeout on one,
hit a slave that's replicating off the master.
I don't see anything happening with multiple databases beyond specifying
a read
14 matches
Mail list logo
