Re: [vchkpw] Test FHS patch

2009-04-03 Thread aledr
I'll checkout the SVN and enable the backends compilation again. Digesting config.log I think I some found possible missing files... Thanks Matt. On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Matt Brookings wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > aledr wrote: >> Here it is! Do not worry

Re: [vchkpw] Test FHS patch

2009-04-03 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 aledr wrote: > Here it is! Do not worry about the RPM errors at the end, I need to > fix It on my spec file. You will need to also package in the vusage daemon. It's basically a requirement for the 5.5 tree. It's just not required when building vpo

Re: [vchkpw] Test FHS patch

2009-04-02 Thread aledr
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Matt Brookings wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > aledr wrote: >> + make DESTDIR=/var/tmp/vpopmail-5.5.0-build install -C backends/mysql >> make: Entering directory >> `/usr/src/packages/BUILD/vpopmail-5.5.0/backends/mysql' >> /usr/bin/ins

Re: [vchkpw] Test FHS patch

2009-04-02 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 aledr wrote: > + make DESTDIR=/var/tmp/vpopmail-5.5.0-build install -C backends/mysql > make: Entering directory > `/usr/src/packages/BUILD/vpopmail-5.5.0/backends/mysql' > /usr/bin/install -c vmysql.so > /var/tmp/vpopmail-5.5.0-build/usr/lib64/vmysq

Re: [vchkpw] Test FHS patch

2009-04-02 Thread aledr
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Matt Brookings wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > aledr wrote: >> Patch reject on latest on r879: >> >>> cat Makefile.in.rej >> *** >> *** 58,62 >>         rm -rf config.log config.status Makefile autom4te.cache >> contrib/

Re: [vchkpw] Test FHS patch

2009-04-02 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 aledr wrote: > Patch reject on latest on r879: > >> cat Makefile.in.rej > *** > *** 58,62 > rm -rf config.log config.status Makefile autom4te.cache > contrib/rc.vusaged > > install: $(BINS) > - $(INSTALL) -s -m 0700 v

Re: [vchkpw] Test FHS patch

2009-04-02 Thread aledr
Patch reject on latest on r879: > cat Makefile.in.rej *** *** 58,62 rm -rf config.log config.status Makefile autom4te.cache contrib/rc.vusaged install: $(BINS) - $(INSTALL) -s -m 0700 vusaged $(DESTDIR)$(VPOPMAIL_DIR_BIN) if test ! -r $(DESTDIR)$(VPOPMAIL_

Re: [vchkpw] Test FHS patch

2009-04-02 Thread aledr
Thanks Matt, I'll test it in minutes... On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Matt Brookings wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Okay, here's a patch that does the following: > >  Only chown if root >  Only mkdir if root or DESTDIR is set > > I haven't committed it to the repos

[vchkpw] Test FHS patch

2009-04-02 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Okay, here's a patch that does the following: Only chown if root Only mkdir if root or DESTDIR is set I haven't committed it to the repository yet because I'm not sure if it addresses the issues correctly. If you're working on packaging vpopmail

[vchkpw] Test

2006-09-21 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Test - -- /* Matt Brookings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG Key 0x88999334 Software developer Systems technician Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. (815)776-9465 */ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6

[vchkpw] test email...

2006-03-16 Thread Oliver A. Rojo
-- Oliver A. Rojo __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify t

Re: [vchkpw] test

2005-02-15 Thread Charles Sprickman
OK, so I'm not the only one that noticed the day-long lag, eh? On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Positive Negative wrote: -- AIM: FucPsSht

[vchkpw] test

2005-02-15 Thread Positive Negative
-- AIM: FucPsSht

[vchkpw] test

2004-05-10 Thread John Hogenmiller
test

[vchkpw] Test - please disregard...

2004-04-12 Thread Charles Wu
ping

[vchkpw] test

2004-04-12 Thread 王晓峰

Re: [vchkpw] test copy of vpopmaild.c

2004-04-06 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 20:18, Ken Jones wrote: > > One little question... What are you thinking of as far as encryption? > > I'm sure there's going to be some people running the client on a box > > seperate from the server. You looking at adding ssl support, or are you > > thinking of just lettin

Re: [vchkpw] test copy of vpopmaild.c

2004-04-06 Thread Charles Sprickman
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004, Rick Widmer wrote: > There is no need to send the ~vpopmail/domains/ part of the path, > because the user has no choice on that part. If we always send the full > path from that point down, then the path is always: > >"$Domain/$User/$whatever" > > or maybe > >"/$Domain

Re: [vchkpw] test copy of vpopmaild.c

2004-04-06 Thread Rick Widmer
Marcin Soltysiak wrote: Either I am missing something or... If we use full path then same operations would look like: Sys Admin would send same as The Domain admin would send same as And the user would send: write_file /path/to/vpopmail/home/domains/test.com/user/VacationMessage And thi

Re: [vchkpw] test copy of vpopmaild.c

2004-04-06 Thread Marcin Soltysiak
- Original Message - From: "Rick Widmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Marcin Soltysiak wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Ken Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>Any votes on which way of specifying directories would be easier > > > >>from the client program's point of view? > > >

Re: [vchkpw] test copy of vpopmaild.c

2004-04-06 Thread Rick Widmer
Marcin Soltysiak wrote: - Original Message - From: "Ken Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Any votes on which way of specifying directories would be easier from the client program's point of view? a) full paths b) relative based on user or command +1 for b) First, it would be a bit like chr

Re: [vchkpw] test copy of vpopmaild.c

2004-04-06 Thread Marcin Soltysiak
- Original Message - From: "Ken Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Monday 05 April 2004 8:08 pm, Charles Sprickman wrote: > > On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Ken Jones wrote: > > > I'd like any comments or votes on how this version > > > is using a POP3 type protocol. > > > > Sounds good to me, this is

Re: [vchkpw] test copy of vpopmaild.c

2004-04-06 Thread Marcin Soltysiak
- Original Message - From: "Ken Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >I think it works pretty nicely. A single "." on a line by itself >represents End of File when sending or receiving multiple >lines of infomation. Nice idea. [cut] >Any votes on which way of specifying directories would be eas

Re: [vchkpw] test copy of vpopmaild.c

2004-04-05 Thread X-Istence
Ken Jones wrote: Anyone want a test copy of vpopmaild before it gets posted? It could use another set of eyes. Ken Sure, shoot me a copy this way :) X-Istence

Re: [vchkpw] test copy of vpopmaild.c

2004-04-05 Thread Rick Widmer
Ken Jones wrote: Any votes on which way of specifying directories would be easier from the client program's point of view? a) full paths b) relative based on user or command As long as you tell me where ~vpopmail is when I login, always using fully qualified paths will be easiest, I think. That

Re: [vchkpw] test copy of vpopmaild.c

2004-04-05 Thread Charles Sprickman
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Ken Jones wrote: > > One little question... What are you thinking of as far as encryption? > > I'm sure there's going to be some people running the client on a box > > seperate from the server. You looking at adding ssl support, or are you > > thinking of just letting somethi

Re: [vchkpw] test copy of vpopmaild.c

2004-04-05 Thread Rick Widmer
Rick Macdougall wrote: I'm of the thought that it should be line of text line of text +OK Or even skip the . and just finish with +OK #more text available here That way every single response ends in +OK or -ERR +1. Note, I removed the . in the response list. It will be easier to just look f

Re: [vchkpw] test copy of vpopmaild.c

2004-04-05 Thread Rick Widmer
Charles Sprickman wrote: On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Ken Jones wrote: I'd like any comments or votes on how this version is using a POP3 type protocol. Sounds good to me, this is getting exciting! One little question... What are you thinking of as far as encryption? I'm sure there's going to be som

Re: [vchkpw] test copy of vpopmaild.c

2004-04-05 Thread Ken Jones
On Monday 05 April 2004 8:08 pm, Charles Sprickman wrote: > On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Ken Jones wrote: > > I'd like any comments or votes on how this version > > is using a POP3 type protocol. > > Sounds good to me, this is getting exciting! > > One little question... What are you thinking of as far as

Re: [vchkpw] test copy of vpopmaild.c

2004-04-05 Thread Rick Macdougall
Hi, Ken Jones wrote: So the mod_user function would take it's options on additional lines, like: moduser [EMAIL PROTECTED] no_smtp quota 1234 . And the server would reply back +OK or -ERR XXX error message I get this list_dir /home/vpopmail/domains/nougen.com/naomi/Maildir/cur +OK . On a user w

Re: [vchkpw] test copy of vpopmaild.c

2004-04-05 Thread Charles Sprickman
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Ken Jones wrote: > I'd like any comments or votes on how this version > is using a POP3 type protocol. Sounds good to me, this is getting exciting! One little question... What are you thinking of as far as encryption? I'm sure there's going to be some people running the clie

Re: [vchkpw] test copy of vpopmaild.c

2004-04-05 Thread Ken Jones
On Monday 05 April 2004 7:36 pm, Rick Widmer wrote: > Ken Jones wrote: > > On Monday 05 April 2004 2:46 pm, Ken Jones wrote: > >>[snip] > > > > I'd like any comments or votes on how this version > > is using a POP3 type protocol. > > I like it very much so far! > > The way you put the user name and

Re: [vchkpw] test copy of vpopmaild.c

2004-04-05 Thread Rick Widmer
Ken Jones wrote: On Monday 05 April 2004 2:46 pm, Ken Jones wrote: [snip] I'd like any comments or votes on how this version is using a POP3 type protocol. I like it very much so far! The way you put the user name and password on the same transaction is even better than following pop3 exact

Re: [vchkpw] test copy of vpopmaild.c

2004-04-05 Thread Rick Widmer
Ken Jones wrote: On Monday 05 April 2004 4:05 pm, you wrote: Ken Jones wrote: Anyone want a test copy of vpopmaild before it gets posted? It could use another set of eyes. Got it! It compiled and ran the first time. Good job Ken! Am I correct that any user can be a System admin, if given SA

Re: [vchkpw] test copy of vpopmaild.c

2004-04-05 Thread Ken Jones
On Monday 05 April 2004 2:46 pm, Ken Jones wrote: >[snip] I'd like any comments or votes on how this version is using a POP3 type protocol. I think it works pretty nicely. A single "." on a line by itself represents End of File when sending or receiving multiple lines of infomation. From the cli

Re: [vchkpw] test copy of vpopmaild.c

2004-04-05 Thread Marcin Soltysiak
- Original Message - From: "Ken Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Here ya go. > Look at README.vpopmaild > > Short test procedure: > ./configure (your options) > make > ./vpopmaild > login [EMAIL PROTECTED] user > help ./configure with option PASSED make PASSED ./vpopmaild ./vpopmaild +OK log

Re: [vchkpw] test copy of vpopmaild.c

2004-04-05 Thread Rick Widmer
Ken Jones wrote: Anyone want a test copy of vpopmaild before it gets posted? It could use another set of eyes. Yes, please. Rick

Re: [vchkpw] test copy of vpopmaild.c

2004-04-05 Thread Rick Macdougall
Ken Jones wrote: Anyone want a test copy of vpopmaild before it gets posted? It could use another set of eyes. Yes please. Regards, Rick

Re: [vchkpw] test copy of vpopmaild.c

2004-04-05 Thread Marcin Soltysiak
> Anyone want a test copy of vpopmaild > before it gets posted? It could use another > set of eyes. Show me the money :-) Solt

[vchkpw] test copy of vpopmaild.c

2004-04-05 Thread Ken Jones
Anyone want a test copy of vpopmaild before it gets posted? It could use another set of eyes. Ken

[vchkpw] test

2003-11-21 Thread 林治强
vchkpw,您好!    test [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-11-22

[vchkpw] Test

2003-10-07 Thread Kevin Angus
Please Delete

[vchkpw] Virus W32.Sobig.F@mm. Was :[vchkpw] Test, is this msg going out at all?

2003-09-09 Thread Chris Pugh
> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I belive what you are seeing is reply from > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Each time I send a message to > this list, I get a reply from him/She ... Virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the culprit. There are many different messages flying abut, not just this one. If you to thi

Re: [vchkpw] RE: OFF LIST - Re: [vchkpw] Test, is this msg going out at all?

2003-09-09 Thread kevin
AIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 1:14 PM Subject: [vchkpw] RE: OFF LIST - Re: [vchkpw] Test, is this msg going out at all? > Hi Chris, > I don't know what you mean but this virus warning.. but the errors I get are > not exactly errors

[vchkpw] RE: OFF LIST - Re: [vchkpw] Test, is this msg going out at all?

2003-09-09 Thread Shai Ben-Naphtali
etting back to me every time I send out a mail to these mailing lists? Cheers, Shai > -Original Message- > From: Chris Pugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 9:02 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: OFF LIST - Re: [vchkpw] Test, is this msg going

[vchkpw] Test, is this msg going out at all?

2003-09-09 Thread Shai Ben-Naphtali
Hi, I get an error when I send out msgs to the mailing lists... but I wonder if you guys knew what they mean. This is a test mail just to get the msg, and then, if you even get this msg, I'll add the reply emails I get from a server I know nothing about... Shai

[vchkpw] test

2003-03-25 Thread rich
test

[vchkpw] test

2002-10-18 Thread grant.cooper
test