I'll checkout the SVN and enable the backends compilation again.
Digesting config.log I think I some found possible missing files...
Thanks Matt.
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Matt Brookings wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> aledr wrote:
>> Here it is! Do not worry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
aledr wrote:
> Here it is! Do not worry about the RPM errors at the end, I need to
> fix It on my spec file.
You will need to also package in the vusage daemon. It's basically a
requirement
for the 5.5 tree. It's just not required when building vpo
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> aledr wrote:
>> + make DESTDIR=/var/tmp/vpopmail-5.5.0-build install -C backends/mysql
>> make: Entering directory
>> `/usr/src/packages/BUILD/vpopmail-5.5.0/backends/mysql'
>> /usr/bin/ins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
aledr wrote:
> + make DESTDIR=/var/tmp/vpopmail-5.5.0-build install -C backends/mysql
> make: Entering directory
> `/usr/src/packages/BUILD/vpopmail-5.5.0/backends/mysql'
> /usr/bin/install -c vmysql.so
> /var/tmp/vpopmail-5.5.0-build/usr/lib64/vmysq
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> aledr wrote:
>> Patch reject on latest on r879:
>>
>>> cat Makefile.in.rej
>> ***
>> *** 58,62
>> rm -rf config.log config.status Makefile autom4te.cache
>> contrib/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
aledr wrote:
> Patch reject on latest on r879:
>
>> cat Makefile.in.rej
> ***
> *** 58,62
> rm -rf config.log config.status Makefile autom4te.cache
> contrib/rc.vusaged
>
> install: $(BINS)
> - $(INSTALL) -s -m 0700 v
Patch reject on latest on r879:
> cat Makefile.in.rej
***
*** 58,62
rm -rf config.log config.status Makefile autom4te.cache
contrib/rc.vusaged
install: $(BINS)
- $(INSTALL) -s -m 0700 vusaged $(DESTDIR)$(VPOPMAIL_DIR_BIN)
if test ! -r $(DESTDIR)$(VPOPMAIL_
Thanks Matt, I'll test it in minutes...
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Okay, here's a patch that does the following:
>
> Only chown if root
> Only mkdir if root or DESTDIR is set
>
> I haven't committed it to the repos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Okay, here's a patch that does the following:
Only chown if root
Only mkdir if root or DESTDIR is set
I haven't committed it to the repository yet because I'm not sure if it
addresses the issues correctly. If you're working on packaging vpopmail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Test
- --
/*
Matt Brookings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG Key 0x88999334
Software developer Systems technician
Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. (815)776-9465
*/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6
--
Oliver A. Rojo
__
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to
whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error
please notify t
OK, so I'm not the only one that noticed the day-long lag, eh?
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Positive Negative wrote:
--
AIM: FucPsSht
--
AIM: FucPsSht
test
ping
On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 20:18, Ken Jones wrote:
> > One little question... What are you thinking of as far as encryption?
> > I'm sure there's going to be some people running the client on a box
> > seperate from the server. You looking at adding ssl support, or are you
> > thinking of just lettin
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004, Rick Widmer wrote:
> There is no need to send the ~vpopmail/domains/ part of the path,
> because the user has no choice on that part. If we always send the full
> path from that point down, then the path is always:
>
>"$Domain/$User/$whatever"
>
> or maybe
>
>"/$Domain
Marcin Soltysiak wrote:
Either I am missing something or... If we use full path then same operations
would look like:
Sys Admin would send same as
The Domain admin would send same as
And the user would send:
write_file /path/to/vpopmail/home/domains/test.com/user/VacationMessage
And thi
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Widmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Marcin Soltysiak wrote:
>
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Ken Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>Any votes on which way of specifying directories would be easier
> >
> >>from the client program's point of view?
> >
>
Marcin Soltysiak wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Any votes on which way of specifying directories would be easier
from the client program's point of view?
a) full paths
b) relative based on user or command
+1 for b) First, it would be a bit like chr
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Monday 05 April 2004 8:08 pm, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> > On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Ken Jones wrote:
> > > I'd like any comments or votes on how this version
> > > is using a POP3 type protocol.
> >
> > Sounds good to me, this is
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I think it works pretty nicely. A single "." on a line by itself
>represents End of File when sending or receiving multiple
>lines of infomation.
Nice idea.
[cut]
>Any votes on which way of specifying directories would be eas
Ken Jones wrote:
Anyone want a test copy of vpopmaild
before it gets posted? It could use another
set of eyes.
Ken
Sure, shoot me a copy this way :)
X-Istence
Ken Jones wrote:
Any votes on which way of specifying directories would be easier
from the client program's point of view?
a) full paths
b) relative based on user or command
As long as you tell me where ~vpopmail is when I login, always using
fully qualified paths will be easiest, I think. That
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Ken Jones wrote:
> > One little question... What are you thinking of as far as encryption?
> > I'm sure there's going to be some people running the client on a box
> > seperate from the server. You looking at adding ssl support, or are you
> > thinking of just letting somethi
Rick Macdougall wrote:
I'm of the thought that it should be
line of text
line of text
+OK
Or even skip the . and just finish with +OK #more text available here
That way every single response ends in +OK or -ERR
+1.
Note, I removed the . in the response list. It will be easier to just
look f
Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Ken Jones wrote:
I'd like any comments or votes on how this version
is using a POP3 type protocol.
Sounds good to me, this is getting exciting!
One little question... What are you thinking of as far as encryption?
I'm sure there's going to be som
On Monday 05 April 2004 8:08 pm, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Ken Jones wrote:
> > I'd like any comments or votes on how this version
> > is using a POP3 type protocol.
>
> Sounds good to me, this is getting exciting!
>
> One little question... What are you thinking of as far as
Hi,
Ken Jones wrote:
So the mod_user function would take it's
options on additional lines, like:
moduser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
no_smtp
quota 1234
.
And the server would reply back
+OK
or
-ERR XXX error message
I get this
list_dir /home/vpopmail/domains/nougen.com/naomi/Maildir/cur
+OK
.
On a user w
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Ken Jones wrote:
> I'd like any comments or votes on how this version
> is using a POP3 type protocol.
Sounds good to me, this is getting exciting!
One little question... What are you thinking of as far as encryption?
I'm sure there's going to be some people running the clie
On Monday 05 April 2004 7:36 pm, Rick Widmer wrote:
> Ken Jones wrote:
> > On Monday 05 April 2004 2:46 pm, Ken Jones wrote:
> >>[snip]
> >
> > I'd like any comments or votes on how this version
> > is using a POP3 type protocol.
>
> I like it very much so far!
>
> The way you put the user name and
Ken Jones wrote:
On Monday 05 April 2004 2:46 pm, Ken Jones wrote:
[snip]
I'd like any comments or votes on how this version
is using a POP3 type protocol.
I like it very much so far!
The way you put the user name and password on the same transaction is
even better than following pop3 exact
Ken Jones wrote:
On Monday 05 April 2004 4:05 pm, you wrote:
Ken Jones wrote:
Anyone want a test copy of vpopmaild
before it gets posted? It could use another
set of eyes.
Got it! It compiled and ran the first time. Good job Ken!
Am I correct that any user can be a System admin, if given SA
On Monday 05 April 2004 2:46 pm, Ken Jones wrote:
>[snip]
I'd like any comments or votes on how this version
is using a POP3 type protocol.
I think it works pretty nicely. A single "." on a line by itself
represents End of File when sending or receiving multiple
lines of infomation.
From the cli
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Here ya go.
> Look at README.vpopmaild
>
> Short test procedure:
> ./configure (your options)
> make
> ./vpopmaild
> login [EMAIL PROTECTED] user
> help
./configure with option PASSED
make PASSED
./vpopmaild
./vpopmaild
+OK
log
Ken Jones wrote:
Anyone want a test copy of vpopmaild
before it gets posted? It could use another
set of eyes.
Yes, please.
Rick
Ken Jones wrote:
Anyone want a test copy of vpopmaild
before it gets posted? It could use another
set of eyes.
Yes please.
Regards,
Rick
> Anyone want a test copy of vpopmaild
> before it gets posted? It could use another
> set of eyes.
Show me the money :-)
Solt
Anyone want a test copy of vpopmaild
before it gets posted? It could use another
set of eyes.
Ken
vchkpw,您好!
test
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2003-11-22
Please
Delete
> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I belive what you are seeing is reply from
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Each time I send a message to
> this list, I get a reply from him/She ...
Virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the culprit. There are many
different messages flying abut, not just this one.
If you to thi
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 1:14 PM
Subject: [vchkpw] RE: OFF LIST - Re: [vchkpw] Test, is this msg going out at
all?
> Hi Chris,
> I don't know what you mean but this virus warning.. but the errors I get
are
> not exactly errors
etting back to me
every time I send out a mail to these mailing lists?
Cheers,
Shai
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Pugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 9:02 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: OFF LIST - Re: [vchkpw] Test, is this msg going
Hi,
I get an error when I send out msgs to the mailing lists... but I wonder if
you guys knew what they mean. This is a test mail just to get the msg, and
then, if you even get this msg, I'll add the reply emails I get from a
server I know nothing about...
Shai
test
test
48 matches
Mail list logo