RE: [Veritas-bu] Renaming NB 6.0MP2 servers

2006-05-11 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Steve Any docs? Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B32AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Steven L. Sesar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 May 2006 15:39

[Veritas-bu] Windows 2003 date format

2006-05-11 Thread mark . a . goodchild
All Does anyone know how to format the date in a windows 2003 batch script I want to change dd/mm/yy to mm/dd/yy Regards Mark Goodchild Branches Remediation J.P.Morgan Chase Phone: 01202347149 Mail: Mark A Goodchild/[EMAIL PROTECTED] E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Veritas-bu] Windows 2003 date format

2006-05-11 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Title: Message Mark Not tested this, but is it something like set PDate%mm%/%DD%/%YY% Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B32AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original

Re: [Veritas-bu] Shortening Timeouts

2006-05-11 Thread Justin Piszcz
If the host is unreachable to begin with you should get an error 48, if it becomes unreachable during the backup, you'd have to show us your configuration times/timeout settings.. I am trying to think if I ever shut a box down while it was being backed up and recalling the timeout/etc.., I do

RE: [Veritas-bu] Shortening Timeouts

2006-05-11 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Hi Jason In a nice real world, if the server was up, then the timeouts would take affect. As you mentioned this was an early power down - what was the backup server doing - was there tapes in the robotic library? Did the robot go down as well? From experience, if a power outage occurs, that was

[Veritas-bu] Backups running twice during the backup window

2006-05-11 Thread Lew, David
Title: Backups running twice during the backup window Hi, My oracle DB netbackup jobs appearantly have been running twice during its backup window. I have scheduled the job to kick-ini at 15:00hrs. The backups run again at 3AM. Any ideas? I am using RMAN scripts via Netbackup. DLew

[Veritas-bu] Anyone have an StorageTek SL500 library?

2006-05-11 Thread Justin Piszcz
We will be receiving an EVAL unit soon and wonder if anyone had any opinions on this library? For instance, how reliable is it compared to say, an L700? Suppose an L700 is better, but the other problem is STK is deprecating that library soon and the SL500 is going to be the newly supported

RE: [Veritas-bu] Backups running twice during the backup window

2006-05-11 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Title: Message David what frequency is set for the Schedule you have setup for the Window? Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B32AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original

RE: [Veritas-bu] Symantec and Linux support

2006-05-11 Thread Jeff Lightner
This makes the assumption someone at Symantec actually looks at these things. I don't know of anyone who has posted on this link that has ever seen a response. I know I haven't. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tristan Ball Sent:

RE: [Veritas-bu] Backups running twice during the backup window

2006-05-11 Thread Martin, Jonathan \(Contractor\)
Title: Backups running twice during the backup window I have an issue with one particular Oracle job where it runs twice in a row. The minute one job completes, a second fires off and backs up the data again. Thankfully its a small database. I so far have yet to figure it out but I've triple

Re: [Veritas-bu] Anyone have an StorageTek SL500 library?

2006-05-11 Thread Ed Wilts
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 07:19:00AM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote: We will be receiving an EVAL unit soon and wonder if anyone had any opinions on this library? For instance, how reliable is it compared to say, an L700? Suppose an L700 is better, but the other problem is STK is deprecating that

[Veritas-bu] Exclusion list

2006-05-11 Thread Covington, Garrett
I have a windows server that has a load of mounted iscsi drive letters (E:\ - X:\). None of the files on any of the drives need to be backed up except c:\, d:\ and the system state. What is the best way to exclude all drives except the ones I need? I currently have the box backing up all

RE: [Veritas-bu] Exclusion list

2006-05-11 Thread Spearman, David
Title: Message Depends If the system in question is in a policy with other systems that use all local drives/system state directives thenyou just want to exclude the entire driveon the client exclude list (like E:/ F:/ ) no * required. If you happened to have a file(s) on any of the

Re: [Veritas-bu] Exclusion list

2006-05-11 Thread Justin Piszcz
Why not just include SYSTEM_STATE, C:\ and D:\? On 5/11/06, Covington, Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a windows server that has a load of mounted iscsi drive letters (E:\ - X:\). None of the files on any of the drives need to be backed up except c:\, d:\ and the system state. What

[Veritas-bu] Datacenter 4.5 Question

2006-05-11 Thread Martin, Jonathan \(Contractor\)
Title: Backups running twice during the backup window Running Datacenter 4.5 FP6 on Windows 2000 I'm a little confused by the datacenter documentation in Veritas Support. It looks like the FP7 8 and 9 are not cumulative, and the documentation says you must install them on top of FP6, which

RE: [Veritas-bu] Exclusion list

2006-05-11 Thread Mark.Donaldson
Title: Message We did the latter for our C D only systems. Just build a policy wth C, D, system state in it put our half dozen (about 10%) of our NT systems in it. -M From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Spearman, DavidSent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 8:45 AMTo:

Re: [Veritas-bu] Anyone have an StorageTek SL500 library?

2006-05-11 Thread Casey Feskens
Ed Wilts wrote: On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 07:19:00AM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote: We will be receiving an EVAL unit soon and wonder if anyone had any opinions on this library? For instance, how reliable is it compared to say, an L700? Suppose an L700 is better, but the other problem is STK is

Re: [Veritas-bu] Symantec and Linux support

2006-05-11 Thread Rob Worman
FYI on this topic of NBU support and RedHat 3 in particular... Ed, you wrote that: snip Fact: NetBackup 6.5, targeted for release in February, 2007, will drop support for RHEL 3. RHEL 3 started shipping in October, 2003 and will be supported by Red Hat through October, 2010. Symantec will

RE: [Veritas-bu] Sg / sgen driver issue

2006-05-11 Thread Song, Young
Currently my /dev/rmt directory has symlinks for the ID 0 only no matter what I tried (devfsadm, cfgadm, boot -r, etc.) By any chance, is configuring the SG driver a next step once I have all the entries in /dev/rmt? If I don't have /dev/rmt entries for the 2nd drive, what should I do? Thanks.

Re: [Veritas-bu] Symantec and Linux support

2006-05-11 Thread Austin Murphy
From that link it shows that RedHat's support position boils down to 3 years of helping people migrate TO a particular release and 4 years of migrating FROM that release. Basically, after 3 years, they won't officially help you deploy a new system on that release. Same with Symantec. New

Re: [Veritas-bu] Backups running twice during the backup window

2006-05-11 Thread Wayne T Smith
If they are both scheduled by NetBackup, it's probably in your Policy(ies) and Schedule(s) configuration. The most likely scenarios are multiple policies or using a frequency-based schedule where your frequency is 12 hours. If using Calendar-based scheduling, I'll note that the 1500 and 0300

RE: [Veritas-bu] File listing for Fragment

2006-05-11 Thread Greenberg, Brian
Mickey, You're right. Easiest way would to be to import the tape set and then restore to another NDMP host however, you may need to know of it came from a EMC or a NetApp box. You can't restore EMC to NetApp and visa versa. Additionally, the backup may have happened in dump or tar.

[Veritas-bu] Status: 525 Can not connect to NB-Java

2006-05-11 Thread Yosifovski, Tammy
Title: Status: 525 Can not connect to NB-Java Solaris 10, NB 6.0 Receiving the following error when using jnbSA. Unable to login, status: 525 Can not connect to the NB-Java authentication service via VNETD on server name on port 13724. Check the log file for more details.

[Veritas-bu] Host properties from command line?

2006-05-11 Thread Dave Lowenstein
Is there a way from the command line on solaris with nbu 4.5 fp3 to get a client list including the version of each netbackup client? I can look under jnbSA and go to host properties-clients and individually click on clients to see their version but any attempts to export this data are

[Veritas-bu] command to list clients in policy [is there one ?] - NBU6.0

2006-05-11 Thread Wilkinson, Alex
Hi all, Is there any command out there to list all clients within a single policy ? In HP DataProtector I am able to grep through text files for this. How about NBU 6.0MP2 ? -aW ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu

Re: [Veritas-bu] bpcoverage - FYI

2006-05-11 Thread Wilkinson, Alex
0n Thu, May 11, 2006 at 02:42:37PM +0100, Whelan, Patrick wrote: I thought I would pass this on in case anyone else has run into it. Environment: Solaris Master 5.1MP4 HP-UX Media Servers 5.1MP4 If, in the policy, you specify a windows drive with a lower case