I just put this up as the first in a series of Mac web dev workflow
tutorials called "Simplifying Web Dev Workflow on Mac".
http://bethink.olioideas.com/?p=59
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Version
Good point Quinn.
I'll pose the question, how much would a person be willing to pay for
having a Git App that is of the same quality of Versions?
I'll pay another 39 pounds for a Git client app. Who wouldn't?
I think Git support would be feature for a paid upgrade to Versions
(if they wish to s
Hey Quinn and Georga,
I would argue the economical thing is not too important once git gains
some critical mass. It's still small compared to svn, and in a way the
compete with Mercurial which is pretty populair too.
A bigger problem would be the licensing as we can't include the Git
source with
Hey Scott,
Very nice tutorial! I saw you were still in demo mode, email me for a
free license :-)
- Koen
On Jul 26, 12:47 am, scott212 wrote:
> I just put this up as the first in a series of Mac web dev workflow
> tutorials called "Simplifying Web Dev Workflow on Mac".
>
> http://bethink.olioi
Koen — Great point, I had neglected to mention that the 3 main
distributed VCS tools (git, Mercurial, and Bazaar) are all under GPL,
which makes it difficult or impossible to create a commercial tool
that uses them. The same restriction prevents Apple (at least
currently) from providing a g
I'd like to hear about the pros and cons of Subclipse in this mix.
Any thoughts?
We write a lot of code, but do OK using Subclipse. Occasionally
there's a messup that we have to work around, but the web usually has
the answers.
- Bob Futrelle
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 6:47 PM, scott212 wrote:
>
Ah thank you Quinn, at least I know where to start.
Do you yourself use SCPlugin or anything similar to display status
icons in Finder?
On Jul 21, 9:31 am, Quinn Taylor wrote:
> If you're talking about the SVN status being displayed via icons in
> Finder, that's not a feature of Versions — yo
I do not. I used to when I was first learning SVN at the command line,
but I haven't for several years. The inconsistency of icons was one
reason for the switch, but lack of overall utility (for me) was
another. Although I can appreciate situations when it may be useful,
especially on Windo
Briefly, I've found that IDE integration for SVN is handy when it
allows for more intelligent refactoring, which both Subclipse and
Subversive do. You could actually argue that if all your projects are
managed within Eclipse, you can get by without Versions. However,
Eclipse and I have a lo