[videoblogging] Re: Best Youtube compression out of Adobe Premiere CS3

2008-02-01 Thread Renat Zarbailov
By the way here is the link to the final video with the compression I mentioned about... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=exvu8Bqx5vQ Is this kick ass quality for youtube or what?? Cheers --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Renat Zarbailov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After 2 years of constant

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Best Youtube compression out of Adobe Premiere CS3

2008-02-01 Thread Ron Watson
How about this, Renat: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cSwNz2wu5Gg Cheers, Ron Watson http://k9disc.blip.tv http://k9disc.com http://discdogradio.com http://pawsitivevybe.com On Feb 1, 2008, at 6:34 AM, Renat Zarbailov wrote: By the way here is the link to the final video with the compression

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Best Youtube compression out of Adobe Premiere CS3

2008-02-01 Thread Ron Watson
You could just letter box. CS3 does that doesn't it? Forgot to mention that. I shoot 16x9 and letter box the output as a 320x240 h.264 .mov, bitrate of 1000, blur filter of 1. Cheers, Ron Watson http://k9disc.blip.tv http://k9disc.com http://discdogradio.com http://pawsitivevybe.com On Jan

[videoblogging] Re: Best Youtube compression out of Adobe Premiere CS3

2008-02-01 Thread Renat Zarbailov
Yeah but your footage is not handheld. When the cam is on a tripod the footage in most cases looks great, especially if the scene is well lit. Now, you were talking about blurring the video instead of sharpening it?? Did I miss something? I mean those examples looked nice but I am sure if you

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Best Youtube compression out of Adobe Premiere CS3

2008-02-01 Thread Ron Watson
All of the other footage is handheld. Try to blur your video. It works. It was not a typo. Cheers, Ron Watson http://k9disc.blip.tv http://k9disc.com http://discdogradio.com http://pawsitivevybe.com On Feb 1, 2008, at 3:03 PM, Renat Zarbailov wrote: Yeah but your footage is not handheld.

[videoblogging] Re: Best Youtube compression out of Adobe Premiere CS3

2008-01-31 Thread Chris
I'm confused about changing the aspect ratio for output. Won't the image end up smooshed? Chris --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Renat Zarbailov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After 2 years of constant search for the ideal compression scheme, I have finally come to a solution. If you're using

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Best Youtube compression out of Adobe Premiere CS3

2008-01-31 Thread Kary Rogers
If you upload 16x9 to YouTube they will automatically letterbox it for you. MySpace does as well. Some sites do not. -- Kary Rogers http://www.GoodCommitment.tv On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Renat Zarbailov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah that is the disadvantage of shooting in 16X9 and

[videoblogging] Re: Best Youtube compression out of Adobe Premiere CS3

2008-01-31 Thread Renat Zarbailov
Yeah that is the disadvantage of shooting in 16X9 and outputting to youtube. Ideally it would be best to shoot in 4X3 and not change the aspect ratio but if you you want to preserve the videos for future shoot in 16X9. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm

[videoblogging] Re: Best Youtube compression out of Adobe Premiere CS3

2008-01-31 Thread Renat Zarbailov
Yes that's true but at the expense. The vid then looks washed out. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Kary Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you upload 16x9 to YouTube they will automatically letterbox it for you. MySpace does as well. Some sites do not. -- Kary Rogers