--- Nikolai Weibull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/23/07, Yakov Lerner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > wish: allow a: in the function definition line:
> > function foo(a:line1, a:line2)
> > This is currently not allowed. But it seems logical to allow it.
>
> Why should it be? Extra typi
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 4/23/07, Yakov Lerner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
wish: allow a: in the function definition line:
function foo(a:line1, a:line2)
This is currently not allowed. But it seems logical to allow it.
Why should it be? Extra typing?
Counterwish: implement better seman
The search() doesn't seem to follow 'smartcase' (and this does not
seem to be documented). Is it possible to have a flag to search() to
obey the 'smartcase' ? Can it be included into todo ?
Yakov
On 4/20/07, Bram Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/11/07, Bob Hiestand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The attached patch very simply implements the following from the todo:
> 7 There is no way to change directory and go back without changing the local
> and/or global directory.
I get coredump and repainting problem,
trying to highlight range of lines with :match, as follows:
vim -u NONE# this is v7.0.222
:set nocp
:help search() " get some text. the line number is 4078
:match Search /\%4078l\_.*\%4200l/
" the range of lines 4078-4200 is highlighted here. S
On 4/23/07, Yakov Lerner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
wish: allow a: in the function definition line:
function foo(a:line1, a:line2)
This is currently not allowed. But it seems logical to allow it.
Why should it be? Extra typing?
Counterwish: implement better semantics for VimScript so th
wish: allow a: in the function definition line:
function foo(a:line1, a:line2)
This is currently not allowed. But it seems logical to allow it.
Yakov
> I agree that a different function would be more useful. I prefer
> haslocaldir(). This would return zero when the current window uses the
> global directory, one when it has a local directory. Later we could add
> an argument for selecting the window.
>
> If you agree, and nobody has somethin
On 4/20/07, Bram Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It was still in my pile of messages to read.
I apologize for my impatience.
I agree that a different function would be more useful. I prefer
haslocaldir(). This would return zero when the current window uses the
global directory, one wh
В пн, 2007-04-23 в 19:56 +0200, Nikolai Weibull написа:
> On 4/23/07, Charles E Campbell Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Viktor Kojouharov wrote:
>
> > > It turned out that these mappings broke the arrow keys in the terminal:
> > > inoremappumvisible()?"\":"\"
>
> > IMHO, if one is expe
On 4/23/07, Charles E Campbell Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Viktor Kojouharov wrote:
> It turned out that these mappings broke the arrow keys in the terminal:
> inoremappumvisible()?"\":"\"
IMHO, if one is expecting to use vim (as opposed to gvim), mapping
causes trouble.
That's b
Viktor Kojouharov wrote:
It turned out that these mappings broke the arrow keys in the terminal:
inoremappumvisible()?"\":"\"
inoremap pumvisible()?"\":"\"
inoremap pumvisible()?"\":"\"
inoremap pumvisible()?"\":"\"
inoremap
pumvisible()?"\\\":"\"
inoremap
p
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 10:35:14PM -0400, David Howland wrote:
> Dear Vim gods,
>
> Please consider adding the following command to Vim:
> :bc (for buffer close)
> It acts just like :bd , except that if the buffer is in a split window,
> it does not remove the window.
> Thank you.
I've seen thi
On 4/23/07, A.J.Mechelynck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Виктор Кожухаров wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think there might be a bug with vim7, and they way it handles the
> arrow keys in a terminal.
> The problem is, that in insert mode, the arrow keys don't navigate
> through the text, but output letters. F
On 4/23/07, A.J.Mechelynck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Виктор Кожухаров wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think there might be a bug with vim7, and they way it handles the
> arrow keys in a terminal.
> The problem is, that in insert mode, the arrow keys don't navigate
> through the text, but output letters. F
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 11:34 +0200, Martin Stubenschrott wrote:
> I am sorry, if this kind of messages are highly despised on this list.
> But since vim-users are my main target group,
>
> I created a new Firefox extension, which makes browsing the web feel
> like browsing a vim buffer:
>
> http:
I am sorry, if this kind of messages are highly despised on this list.
But since vim-users are my main target group,
I created a new Firefox extension, which makes browsing the web feel
like browsing a vim buffer:
http://vimperator.mozdev.org
Maybe it helps you vim users, that :wq actually work
17 matches
Mail list logo
