All,
In reading the CELANI presentation what is striking to me and probably
hardest for everyone, including me to accept even more then the technology
is that between 1995 and 2011 all of those PHDs from all of those
prestigious universities with all that research grant money were only able
to gen
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Chemical Engineer wrote:
> With an 8 million times chemical
> potential I think we should all agree and rename the technology "Low
> Efficiency Nuclear Reaction"...
>
> Just having fun, don't flame me...
Or possibly IENR for a reaction which requires no input but
From: Chemical Engineer
. with all that research grant money were only able to generate tens of
watts of power from their reactions and here comes Rossi with a mail order
degree from a now defunct Kensington University and achieves tens of
thousands of watts of power...
This is not a bi
>From Mark:
...
Bockris states:
> "If I understand clearly what you say, you agree that some of
> the work that has been going on may involve nuclear reactions,"
> Bockris wrote, "but that it's not fusion. Is that what you said?
> If it is, then I agree with it. Most of the condensed
OK, then the only "nano suprise" is that it has taken 20 years to figure
out that it was just surface area? DGT is using micropowder in their specs
and those have been around awhile...
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> *From:* Chemical Engineer
>
> ** **
>
> … with a
Gee, I guess if you had been on the scene then, we would already be well
into the age of Ni-H by now
From: Chemical Engineer
OK, then the only "nano surprise" is that it has taken 20 years to figure
out that it was just surface area? DGT is using micropowder in their specs
and those ha
Hi Steven,
Many moons ago I did have a lengthy phone conversation with SteveK on that
very issue. I summarized it in this vortex posting:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg60298.html
I'll copy it below to save people time looking up the article.
===
SVJ wrote:
ChemE:
This forum really frowns on people who don't use their real names.
-mark
I had a similar thought after I pressed "send". Oh well.
I'm not an economist, but I think today's currencies are all fiat
currencies now (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiat_money). But some
countries still keep bullion around (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Bullion_Depository), pres
multielectron catalysis theory A possible theory for rossi reactor
The situation with the new energy source [1] developed by the Italian
physicists mainly is
similar to the situation with HTSP (high temperature
superconductors): there is the effect, but there are no phenomenon
physical me
It doesn't seem like fusion, specifically, would necessarily be involved in
the transmutation of elements seen in the LENR experiments. My
understanding is that the processes that have recently been proposed to be
at work are inverse beta decay (neutron capture), beta decay, alpha decay
and sponta
Sure, the US went off the gold standard decades ago (a mistake in my
opinion), but where does money get invested when currencies weaken. precious
metals. You do realize that we're not just talking transmutation of two or
three elements. the LENR tests which looked for transmuted elements found
man
101 - 112 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
