Re: [vpp-dev] [VCL] Memory access error for different size of mutex with different glibc versions in VPP and VCL app

Hi Hanlin, You mean pthread_cond_wait doesn’t “fix” the mutex after the peer dies? I guess we could try to fix that but what’s the behavior of the app/vpp once that happens? The fact that the mutex is unusable after vcl dies should not matter much as vpp should forcefully cleanup/detach the

Re: [vpp-dev] why not VPP wireguard add peer: input error ?

OK, Thanks ben! | | li.xia | | lxlee_li...@163.com | 签名由网易邮箱大师定制 On 12/7/2020 20:40，Benoit Ganne (bganne) wrote： Hi, The doc is actually wrong, you should use 'port' instead of 'dst-port': vpp# wireguard peer add wg0 public-key 3xeh8iCP8nSTT0HKGPjQOb/pQXIUncC8Te8oyCU4fVg= endpoint 172.20.20.2

Re: [vpp-dev] Problem with native avf

> On Dec 7, 2020, at 5:16 PM, Damjan Marion wrote: > >> On 07.12.2020., at 22:55, Christian Hopps wrote: > > I just bumped it to 2.13.10 and added REMAKE_INITRD=“yes” into debian/dkms.in > so that should be fixed: > > $ lsinitramfs /boot/initrd.img | grep i40e >

Re: [vpp-dev] Problem with native avf

> On Dec 7, 2020, at 3:02 PM, Damjan Marion wrote: > > > >> On 07.12.2020., at 20:41, Christian Hopps > > wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Dec 7, 2020, at 1:44 PM, Damjan Marion >> > wrote: >>> On 07.12.2020., at 17:02, Christian

[vpp-dev] Plugin communication with Host Application. #plugin #vpp-dev #control_and_data_plane_together

[Edited Message Follows] Hi Team, We developed a plugin and forwarding packets to several interfaces depending on some filtering rules. Now we have a requirement to create these filtering rules from Host Application. We have a problem to use VPPCOM/Binary API. DO we have any communication

[vpp-dev] Plugin communication with Host Application. #plugin #vpp-dev #control_and_data_plane_together

Hi Team, We developed a plugin and forwarding packets to several interfaces depending on some filtering rules. Now we have a requirement to create these filtering rules from Host Application. We have a problem to use VPPCOM/Binary API. DO we have any communication method from HOSTAPP to VPP

[vpp-dev] Calico/vpp 0.10.0 was released today

Hello, Folks may be interested in this message just posted on Calico #vpp slack channel: Just released Calico/VPP v0.10.0, included are * Wireguard support * MTU configuration (in VPP) * Uplink driver autodetection As usual, updated docs are available here

Re: [vpp-dev] Problem with native avf

> On 07.12.2020., at 17:02, Christian Hopps wrote: > > > >> On Dec 7, 2020, at 9:57 AM, Damjan Marion wrote: >> >> >> Anything in dmesg output on PF side? > > VF setup script running > >> [ 168.765633] i40e :65:00.2: FW LLDP is enabled >> [ 168.765635] i40e :65:00.2: Allocating

Re: [vpp-dev] Problem with native avf

> On 07.12.2020., at 20:41, Christian Hopps wrote: > > > >> On Dec 7, 2020, at 1:44 PM, Damjan Marion > > wrote: >> >>> >>> On 07.12.2020., at 17:02, Christian Hopps >> > wrote: >>> >> >> please send me output of:

Re: [vpp-dev] Problem with native avf

> On Dec 7, 2020, at 1:44 PM, Damjan Marion wrote: > >> >> On 07.12.2020., at 17:02, Christian Hopps wrote: >> > > please send me output of: extras/scripts/lsnet script and exact “create > interface avf” commands you use…. PCI Address MAC address Device NameDriver State

Re: [vpp-dev] vppcom and binary api #binapi #vapi #vppcom

Hi Venu, You’ll find documentation regarding the host stack in general and vcl in particular here [1] (see for instance [2]). As for code examples, check here [3] the vcl test client/server apps. Regards, Florin [1] https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/HostStack

Re: [vpp-dev] vppcom and binary api #binapi #vapi #vppcom

Hi Florin, This is nothing to do with the subject being discussed. Can you please direct me to the following i) example(s) of VCL ? ii) Any tutorial explaining the working of VCL ? Thanks & Regards, Venu On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 01:28, Florin Coras wrote: > Hi Ravi, > > VCL is not part of the

Re: [vpp-dev] Jenkins.fd.io response time is very slow

Vanessa put Jenkins into shutdown mode and restarted Jenkins to resolve the issue. Please let me know if you are seeing any issues with FD.io CI jobs. Thanks, -daw- On 12/7/2020 11:41 AM, Dave Wallace via lists.fd.io wrote: Folks, I have opened a case [0] with the LF Help Desk to address

Re: [vpp-dev] vppcom and binary api #binapi #vapi #vppcom

Hi Florin/Team of experts, I have one more question, The basic requirement we have is We have to send some data from our application to our own plugin. While going through previous messages and documentation, we found we can use memif or quick sockets. Our question is, do we have any other VPP

[vpp-dev] Jenkins.fd.io response time is very slow

Folks, I have opened a case [0] with the LF Help Desk to address the slow response of updates to jenkins.fd.io requests which are taking almost a minute to get results. Thanks, -daw- [0] https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/plugins/servlet/theme/portal/2/IT-21159 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links:

[vpp-dev] devicetest verify failures

When new CSIT oper branch got created today, VPP verify jobs started to failing, even though each test passed. That should be fixed [0] now [1]. We are working on verify job improvements on CSIT side to prevent similar issues in the future. Vratko. [0] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/csit/+/30329 [1]

Re: [vpp-dev] Problem with native avf

> On Dec 7, 2020, at 9:57 AM, Damjan Marion wrote: > > > Anything in dmesg output on PF side? VF setup script running > [ 168.765633] i40e :65:00.2: FW LLDP is enabled > [ 168.765635] i40e :65:00.2: Allocating 1 VFs. > [ 168.870431] pci :65:0a.0: [8086:154c] type 00 class

Re: [vpp-dev] Problem with native avf

Anything in dmesg output on PF side? What kernel and driver version do you use? Have you tried latest PF driver from intel? — Damjan > On 07.12.2020., at 15:42, Christian Hopps wrote: > > I'm hitting a problem with the native AVF driver. The issue does not seem to > exist when using the

[vpp-dev] Problem with native avf

I'm hitting a problem with the native AVF driver. The issue does not seem to exist when using the DPDK driver. This is on stable/2009, with the DPDK bump to 2008 reverted (b/c 2008 doesn't work with mellanox anymore apparently). I have an x710 card configured with a 4x10G breakout cable. The

Re: [vpp-dev] why not VPP wireguard add peer: input error ?

Hi, The doc is actually wrong, you should use 'port' instead of 'dst-port': vpp# wireguard peer add wg0 public-key 3xeh8iCP8nSTT0HKGPjQOb/pQXIUncC8Te8oyCU4fVg= endpoint 172.20.20.2 allowed-ip 10.100.0.0/24 port 8001 persistent-keepalive 25 Best ben > -Original Message- > From:

Re: [vpp-dev] SVE/SVE2 based vectorization optimization

Hi Damjan, Sorry for being late. It took me some time to investigate writing SVE/SVE2 code for fixed vector register size. I can totally get your concerns on the code branch caused by deploying scalable vector code, which is quite different from existing SIMD code using NEON, avx2, avx512. In