On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Armin Ronacher
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 9/16/10 2:38 PM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>>>
>>> True... I don't know what's the best option here.. I guess we need to
>>> provide all children so one may visit the whole grap
Phillip wrote:
> At 04:50 PM 12/19/2006 -0800, Jason Kirtland wrote:
>> What would a server do with an absolute URI vs. abs_path, if not
>> place it in PATH_INFO? Or '*', for that matter?
>
> My understanding is that an absolute URI is equivalent to issuing
>
Phillip wrote:
> At 03:36 PM 12/19/2006 -0800, Jason Kirtland wrote:
>> To my reading, PEP 333 implies that a server should plop the
>> Request-URI into PATH_INFO, and it should store it there
>> unmolested.
>
> That's only the case if the address of the applica
Ian wrote:
> Reading the CGI spec I'm noticing some requirements it makes that
> aren't done as much in WSGI.
> [...]
> It's also unclear if the WSGI server is expected to normalize the
> path, specifically things like /foo/../bar -- Apache does do
> this, wsgiref does not.
The spec could definit
