On Monday, 5 December 2016 05:32:46 UTC-4, Joaquin Lopez wrote:
>
> It would be possible to configure the weewx system to be able to receive
> the data from the different sensosrs of our weather estation?
>
> Thanks in davance!
>
I built a system where an Arduino reads sensors using I2C, and send
Hi all
All my stations were on 3.5.0
Had a issue with one so I upgraded to 3.6.2
That's when wu rf stopped
Updated my test rig now its the same
Down graded to 3.5.0 from 3.6.2
No change
Thomas has asked me do do I few checks and sent logs
He carnt find no issue with it
So looks like its a bug on wu
one more thing: be sure that the database specified in /etc/weewx/kl.conf
is different from the database specified in /etc/weewx/wmr88.conf
for example, /var/lib/weewx/kl.sdb and /var/lib/weewx/wmr88.sdb
m
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"weewx-use
On Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 4:53:55 PM UTC-5, BORIS wrote:
>
> I have been using older versions of weewx with WMR88 and KlimaLogg pro on
> different computers. Now I would like to merge the two systems to one
> LinuxMint PC laptop. What is the best way to configure weewx ? When I
> installe
Yes..i have a usb link. Possibly ferrite cores on the link? Yes...the
vantage ws has been up for over a month. I appreciate your assistance. /E
On Dec 6, 2016 4:59 PM, "Thomas Keffer" wrote:
> Odds are this is a problem with a serial to usb converter. Are you using
> one?
>
> The html direct
Odds are this is a problem with a serial to usb converter. Are you using
one?
The html directory will be created when the first report is run.
You have a longish archive interval (30 minutes). Is that what you intended?
-tk
Fat-fingered from my Android
On Dec 6, 2016 12:59 PM, "Eric Gammeter"
I have been using older versions of weewx with WMR88 and KlimaLogg pro on
different computers. Now I would like to merge the two systems to one
LinuxMint PC laptop. What is the best way to configure weewx ? When I
installed weewx 3.6.2 there was no selection possible for the KlimaLogg
driver,
On Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 9:35:48 AM UTC-5, Graeme wrote:
>
> Thanks for the reply. I can see that, for maintainers of software in wide
> use, this would be a difficult problem to solve. However, as an exercise in
> getting to know Python and weewx better, I shall see if I can apply the
>
On this install attempt I get the following info in SYSLOG:
Dec 6 15:48:31 raspberrypi weewx[2226]: manager: added record 2016-12-06
13:30:00 EST (1481049000) to daily summary in 'weewx.sdb'
Dec 6 15:48:31 raspberrypi weewx[2226]: manager: added record 2016-12-06
14:00:00 EST (1481050800) to da
Thanks Neville, I'l try it!
2016-12-05 22:31 GMT+01:00 Neville Davis :
> I have built my own weather station using i2C sensors and a Pi3. This
> generates a csv file I hold in RAM and a seperate driver pulls this data
> into weewx.
>
> There have been several posts of methods of doing something s
If you are on 3.5.0 try the other way - and see if changing the version in
weewx.conf to 3.6.2 makes WU rapidfire appear to fail!!
On Tuesday, 6 December 2016 20:49:18 UTC+2, Andrew Milner wrote:
> That's why I suggested just changing the version in weewx.conf and trying
> to 'fool' WU to see i
That's why I suggested just changing the version in weewx.conf and trying
to 'fool' WU to see if it is something in THEIR validation procedures - as
the weewx version is part of the rapid fire upload.. just a thought
.
On Tuesday, 6 December 2016 20:41:36 UTC+2, Marty Thompson wrote:
Thanks mate
I did a reinstall is on 3.5.0 now
But might downgrade back to wheezy on the RPI as well
But Thomas said its transmits the correct URL
The bit that stumps me is they both did it after a upgrade
Cheers
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"weewx-
Out of curiosity - change weewx.conf to give the earlier version of weewx -
so that WU think you are using an earlier version - and see what
happens!!!
On Tuesday, 6 December 2016 20:08:17 UTC+2, Marty Thompson wrote:
> Yea only diff is.
> Weeazy. And 3.5.0
> Jessie 3.6.2
>
> Just waitin
Yea only diff is.
Weeazy. And 3.5.0
Jessie 3.6.2
Just waiting to see what wu says
Cheers again for the help
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to weewx-
Hi,
another day - another question... :(
We actually use two additional Stations within our Davis Vantage 2 - 6345OV
- one is set up as leaf, the other as soil moisture/temp.
But we need more than 4 soil moisture sensors to support our sponsor - so
we have to connect them in anyway directly to t
Grame, if you decide to tackle this, the right way to do it is to write a
driver for the weedb shim. It takes care of any database differences.
I doubt the differences in case-sensitivity will be a major problem. Weewx
does not take advantage of case sensitivity.
-tk
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 6:35
Unfortunately, the WMR89 seems to use a completely different protocol than
any of the other Oregon Scientific instruments (why??), so we don't have a
driver. As Oregon Scientific does not publish their protocols, it would
have to be reverse engineered.
-tk
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Jimmy Ut
This is showing pretty definitively that weewx is posting LOOP packets to
Rapidfire every 2 seconds, just like it's supposed to.
I have no explanation for why the results are not showing up. It's even
more mysterious that your other stations seem to work fine.
-tk
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 5:25 PM,
M (or should it be m?)
Thanks for the reply. I can see that, for maintainers of software in wide
use, this would be a difficult problem to solve. However, as an exercise in
getting to know Python and weewx better, I shall see if I can apply the
changes to the latest release to satisfy my own req
Alright! Your information was great. Thanks much. I found the info using
pi@raspberrypi:~ $ dmesg | grep ttyUSB0
[5.446819] usb 1-1.4: cp210x converter now attached to ttyUSB0
[ 130.145672] cp210x ttyUSB0: usb_serial_generic_read_bulk_callback - urb
stopped: -32
[ 130.145785] cp210x t
Mike,
Do you have an APRS passcode? I can generate one for you if needed.
Dave-KB1PVH
Sent from my Galaxy S7
On Dec 6, 2016 7:15 AM, "'Michael Connors' via weewx-user" <
weewx-user@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the fast response!
>
> 73,
>
> Mike, NA5SS
>
>
> On Tuesday, December 6, 2
Thanks for the fast response!
73,
Mike, NA5SS
On Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 4:24:42 AM UTC-7, Michael Connors wrote:
>
> My station always connects to CWOP-3 and it has been down now for several
> days. Is there a way that I can have weewx connect randomly to one of the
> servers that are
Andrew,
Correct. I should probably wait until the coffee kicks in before answering
questions, LOL.
Dave-KB1PVH
Sent from my Galaxy S7
On Dec 6, 2016 7:03 AM, "Andrew Milner" wrote:
> Dave - that was my point exactly - if an ham use rotate, if not a ham use
> cwop.aprs.net - but no need to sp
Thank you for your response, even though it wasn't perhaps the best of news.
As they mentioned in the thread it seems like a nice station, so it would
be fun to have support for it. If there was more than 24 hours a day I
could perhaps buy one and help with adding support for it but this project
Dave - that was my point exactly - if an ham use rotate, if not a ham use
cwop.aprs.net - but no need to specify cwop-3 specifically, which was his
problem as cwop-3 is currently down. I posted the link so others know the
correct route to follow and how to obtain the validation code if they are
Andrew,
For the Amateur radio operators they recommend using rotate to spread the
load out on the servers, it's kinda like a backdoor into the APRS system. I
can provide him with an APRS passcode if he doesn't already have one.
Dave-KB1PVH
Sent from my Galaxy S7
On Dec 6, 2016 6:49 AM, "Andrew
Dave - I thought the rotate servers were only for use if you have a
validation code, whilst the cwop.aprs.net should be used without the
validation code - or is the link I posted out of date??
On Tuesday, 6 December 2016 13:43:46 UTC+2, Dave Webb wrote:
> It's recommended now that you use ro
It's recommended now that you use rotate.aprs.net:14580
Here is my CWOP section
[[CWOP]]
# This section is for configuring posts to CWOP.
# If you wish to do this, set the option 'enable' to true,
# and specify the station ID (e.g., CW1234).
enable = true
Looks as though you should be using cwop.aprs.net
http://www.wxqa.com/servers2use.html
On Tuesday, 6 December 2016 13:24:42 UTC+2, Michael Connors wrote:
> My station always connects to CWOP-3 and it has been down now for several
> days. Is there a way that I can have weewx connect randomly
You'll have to wait for Mathew and/or Tom for the 'official' response - but
this Cumulus forum thread may give you some clues and answers
http://sandaysoft.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=14016
On Tuesday, 6 December 2016 13:08:03 UTC+2, Jimmy Utterström wrote:
> Hi there!
> I just discover
Hi there!
I just discovered the weewx project and it seems to be great for my needs
of building a custom weather station interface. I'm looking into buying
the WMR89 from Oregon but I noticed it's not on the supported hardware
list. Is there any specific reason for this or is it maybe just that
32 matches
Mail list logo
