Scott,
That's why the rest of my email focussed on things that we could that would
improve editor retention and which would be uncontentious, but also there is a
third question, are people's assumptions re newbie behaviour true? This is
where research would be useful. Where the problem lies in
Dear James,
very well argued, thanks for the insightful post.
Saving drafts on the other hand could help avoid many conflicts on
less-trafficked pages.
Right now, on a page that is edited infrequently, this happens:
- User A starts an edit
- User A saves not to lose work, not quite done yet.
On 26 September 2014 11:43, Luca de Alfaro l...@dealfaro.com wrote:
Saving drafts on the other hand could help avoid many conflicts on
less-trafficked pages.
Right now, on a page that is edited infrequently, this happens:
- User A starts an edit
- User A saves not to lose work, not quite
Hoi,
Did you read this [1] the notion that bots are good for increasing the
number of editors is contentious. However, numbers from the Swedish
Wikipedia experience confirim exactly that bots are good. They not only
increase the number of readers but also the number of editors.. BIG GRIN
Thanks,
