Sounds interesting, is there a github repo?
On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 8:19 PM Amirouche Boubekki <
amirouche.boube...@gmail.com> wrote:
> GerardM post triggered my interest to post to the mailing list. As you
> might know I am working on functional quadstore that is quadstore that
> keeps around old
GerardM post triggered my interest to post to the mailing list. As you
might know I am working on functional quadstore that is quadstore that
keeps around old version of data, like a wiki but in direct-acyclic-graph.
It only stores differences between commits. It rely on snapshot of the
latest vers
looks like you are ready for the weekend Gerard :-) I don't see a scale
issue at the moment for the type of wikidata use cases I come across. Even
total number of triples is plateauing at 7.6bn*. ( of course it's easy to
write "bad" queries that bring down the server). Allowing people to setup
thei
Hoi,
Lies, damned lies and statistics. The quality of Wikidata suffers, it could
be so much better if we truly wanted Wikidata to grow. Your numbers only
show growth within the limits of what has been made possible. Traffic and
numbers could be much more.
Thanks,
GerardM
On Fri, 3 May 2019
Gerard, I like wikidata a lot, kudos to the community for keeping it going.
But keep it real, there is no exponential growth here.
We are looking at a slow and sustainable growth at the moment with possibly
a plateauing of number of users and when it comes to total number of
wikidata items. just t
> Wikidata grows like mad. This is something we all experience in the really
> bad
> response times we are suffering. It is so bad that people are asked what kind
> of
> updates they are running because it makes a difference in the lag times there
> are.
>
> Given that Wikidata is growing lik
Hoi,
This mail thread is NOT about the issues that I or others face at this
time. They are serious enough but that is not for this thread. People are
working hard to find a solution for now. That is cool.
What I want to know is are we technically and financially ready for a
continued exponential
I imagine the federation of Wikibase instances becoming part of the solution:
https://addshore.com/2018/04/wikibase-of-wikibases/
Along those lines, I wonder if there is potential for Wikibase as a component
in the W3C Solid project’s effort:
https://www.w3.org/community/solid/wiki/Main_Page
J
Gerard mentioned the PROBLEM in the 2nd sentence. I read it clearly
>we all experience in the really bad response times we are suffering. It is
so bad that people are asked what kind of updates they are running because
it makes a difference in the lag times there are.
The response times are
I agree it is not clear what is being discussed here. It is growing, but in
(my opinion) in a positive way, i.e. being accepted as a viable knowledge
graph.
Regards,
Andra
On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 3:27 PM David Abián wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Indeed, Wikidata grows and will continue growing. But I don't
Hi!
Indeed, Wikidata grows and will continue growing. But I don't see
clearly what the purpose of this thread is. Is it to propose possible
technical and financial improvements?
Regards,
David
On 5/3/19 14:24, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
> Hoi,
> Wikidata grows like mad. This is something we all exp
Hoi,
Wikidata grows like mad. This is something we all experience in the really
bad response times we are suffering. It is so bad that people are asked
what kind of updates they are running because it makes a difference in the
lag times there are.
Given that Wikidata is growing like a weed, it fol
12 matches
Mail list logo
