I have used the email support on other Discourse instances and can say
that it is *really* bad. The messages are not sent in the right order,
edited posts don't work, the formatting doesn't work well, headers
related to mailing lists aren't sent properly and I have many other
complaints. I don't th
Ad Huikeshoven, 08/02/2016 22:09:
Please let me know if anything is missing at Wikimedia Discourse that
the current wikisource-l mailing list does have.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Discourse#What_we.27d_lose_.28user_experience.29
Nemo
___
Wikiso
Hi,
Aubrey and Sam would like to try Discourse as an alternative for the
wikisource-l mailing list. A pilot installation is up and running at
https://discourse.wmflabs.org/. There is a separate category for
wikisource-l related discussions on the Discourse site. Members can create
new posts by mai
John Mark Vandenberg, 20/01/2016 01:57:
A raw dump (including all metadata) export functionality should be a
hard requirement for any software put into production in Wikimedia.
Indeed. We don't have enough information to make any decision or even
start considering things yet.
I found my resear
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 3:24 AM, Andrea Zanni wrote:
> Luis Villa, from WMF, asks if there is a list that wants to try Discourse:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2016-January/081244.html
>
> Discourse is a (great) software for discussion, and it could be very useful
> for givin
On 20/01/16 17:58, Andrea Zanni wrote:
If there is consensus, I can propose Wikisource-l for a test. Just
tell me.
I'm supportive. Don't know if there's consensus yet. Nemo, have you had
any experience using Discourse just via email? Would it work for you
that way? (i.e. then doesn't invol
If there is consensus, I can propose Wikisource-l for a test. Just tell me.
Aubrey
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 1:57 AM, John Mark Vandenberg
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 3:46 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo)
> wrote:
> > I hate Discourse because it doesn't work without JavaScript. Every time I
> > end
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 3:46 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo)
wrote:
> I hate Discourse because it doesn't work without JavaScript. Every time I
> end up on a discourse website I end up crying.
>
> Last time I checked, it also didn't have particularly good export features.
> I thought I had added to
> htt
I'm amazed -- a non-mediawiki idea for discussion! ;)
I reckon it'd be worth a try. People who don't want to use the web
interface can still just post and reply via email. And I like the idea
of non-threaded disucssion... it works really well on all the sites I've
used it on.
--Sam
On 2016-
I hate Discourse because it doesn't work without JavaScript. Every time
I end up on a discourse website I end up crying.
Last time I checked, it also didn't have particularly good export
features. I thought I had added to
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Internet_forum_software but
I vote for it. I'd be happy to serve as gunea pig :P
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Andrea Zanni
wrote:
> Luis Villa, from WMF, asks if there is a list that wants to try Discourse:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2016-January/081244.html
>
> Discourse is a (great) software
Luis Villa, from WMF, asks if there is a list that wants to try Discourse:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2016-January/081244.html
Discourse is a (great) software for discussion, and it could be very useful
for giving order to the many mailing lists that we have in the Wikimedia
12 matches
Mail list logo
