There are still a few style issues with your patch. You have inconsistent
spacing after ifs ("if (" vs "if("), missing spaces after commas, and a few
more "}else{"s. You also create a few blocks for no reason other than to get
around the C declarations on top of block rule. Please organize these in
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5873
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5872
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5871
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5868
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5870
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5869
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5867
Your paranoid android.
Hi Yaron,
I'm see this one is still not applied. Maybe because there are still
some small issues? See below.
On 10/03/2010 11:12 PM, Yaron Shahrabani wrote:
+LANGUAGE LANG_HEBREW, SUBLANG_DEFAULT
This line should go, it's redundant (it's already stated at the
beginning). This line was pres
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5829
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5828
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
a few month ago when the discussion about "PreferredOnly" registry
setting came up, I queried Google and found that many more users
use this setting than one may believe - i.e. it is not exotic. Therefore,
I don't think it's that great an idea to reduce the number of devices that
the tests st
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 16:59 +0200, test...@testbot.winehq.org wrote:
> While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
> Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
> wrong, but could you please double-check?
> Full results can be found at
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5824
Your paranoid android.
On 10/05/2010 04:46 AM, Rudolf Mayerhofer wrote:
---
dlls/kernel32/process.c | 21 ++---
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Please exchange patches 2 and 3.
And everywhere in your patches, please stick to _THE SAME_ formatting as the
rest of the file you e
Louis Lenders wrote:
> >It would be better to avoid duplicate GetWindowTextW() calls.
>
> I thought a long time how to fix this, but i couldn't find another way than
> this one, because we need to find out whether or not the window title is
> empty, and afaik we can only do that by calling GetWi
Erich Hoover writes:
> +imgs[nFrames++] = image;
> +if (!(imgstmp = HeapReAlloc( GetProcessHeap(), 0, imgs,
> nFrames*sizeof(XcursorImage*) ))) goto cleanup;
> +imgs = imgstmp;
This is still broken.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
I do not believe this is correct.
You would be destroying the context every time it is released and that
is clearly not what we want to be doing ass ImmGetContext and
ImmReleaseContext as a pair are called over and over again in a typical
application.
-aric
On 10/4/10 1:25 PM, Mikhail Gorbu
2010/10/5 Louis Lenders :
>>It would be better to avoid duplicate GetWindowTextW() calls.
>
> I thought a long time how to fix this, but i couldn't find another way than
> this one, because we need to find out whether or not the window title is
> empty, and afaik we can only do that by calling Ge
On 10/5/2010 14:09, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Jacek Caban writes:
---
dlls/urlmon/binding.c | 17 -
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
This breaks the gameux tests:
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M gameux.dll -T ../../.. -p gameux_test.exe.so
gameexp
Jacek Caban writes:
> ---
> dlls/urlmon/binding.c | 17 -
> 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
This breaks the gameux tests:
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M gameux.dll -T ../../.. -p
gameux_test.exe.so gameexplorer.c && touch gameexplorer.ok
gameexplorer.
> Have you checked that it doesn't just return a
> SYSTEM_LOGICAL_PROCESSOR_INFORMATION ? It seems to be the right
> "format" for the name anyway. I'd play with the size argument or try
> using NtQuerySystemInformationEx (some new thing in win7). You could
> just find a case that passes and impleme
>It would be better to avoid duplicate GetWindowTextW() calls.
I thought a long time how to fix this, but i couldn't find another way than
this one, because we need to find out whether or not the window title is empty,
and afaik we can only do that by calling GetWindowText (again). If you have
23 matches
Mail list logo