On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:48:06PM -0700, chris ahrendt wrote:
>
> > Compiling Wine. Grab a lunch or two, rent a video, or whatever,
> > in the meantime...
> >
> > config.status: executing Makefile commands
> > cat: Make.tmp: No such file or directory
> > config.status: error: could not create Mak
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 03:28:17PM +0200, Octavian Voicu wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Nate Gallaher
> wrote:
> > Should --enable-maintainer-mode be purged then, or should some additional
> > flag magic be added? I ran into this a long time ago as well and made the
> > assumption that
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 04:41:02PM -0600, C.W. Betts wrote:
> Excuse my ignorance, but what would happen if it didn't find the library
> dynamically?
You would check this condition (like NULL handle or NULL function pointer)
in every wrapped function and return an error condition in that case.
O
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 04:36:32AM -0600, C.W. Betts wrote:
> The following is an updated patch that actually builds and links.
> The patch does patch configure and config.h.in, both of which were generated
> with an older version of autoconf and autoheader.
You can and should leave out both conf
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 08:46:27PM -0600, Aric Stewart wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> So I have been hacking on winemp3.acm on the mac to make use of
> CoreAudio for mp3 decoding and I have just gotten it working. So now
> I am faced with a questions.
>
> Do I setup winemp3.acm with #ifdefs to pick b
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 05:56:58PM -0700, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> On 03/05/2010 02:34 PM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 10:11:59PM +0100, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 08:17:15AM -0700, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> >>> It seem
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 10:11:59PM +0100, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 08:17:15AM -0700, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> > It seems that another distro, SuSE 11.x, has Wine-64 compiled by default for
> > x86_64 platforms. That explains all the issues people been
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 08:17:15AM -0700, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> It seems that another distro, SuSE 11.x, has Wine-64 compiled by default for
> x86_64 platforms. That explains all the issues people been having on SuSE
> lately.
>
> Marcus, could you please create a separate package wine-64 inst
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 03:11:22PM -0800, Chris Robinson wrote:
> On Sunday 28 February 2010 1:13:44 pm Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Copy in the mpg123.h header from the library so we do not need it for
> > building. (it is also LPGL)
> >
> &g
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 06:46:06PM +0200, Paul Chitescu wrote:
> > -strcpy(pData->u.network.szNames, "Entire Network");
> > +memcpy(pData->u.network.szNames, "Entire Network", sizeof("Entire
> Network")+1);
>
> Please use a const buffer as "Entire Network" is a string literal, not
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 07:18:18PM +0300, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> On 1/9/2010 16:59, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >handle "invalid menu" return -1. Now with test.
> >
> >Ciao, Marcus
> >---
> > dlls/shell32/shlmenu.c
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 10:17:59AM -0600, Austin English wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Paul Vriens
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just wanted to mention the fact that Marcus (almost single-handedly for the
> > last months) got the number of issues below 300.
>
> Thanks Marcus!
No worries.
IGNORE already, as Windows also
shows inconsistent behaviour...
I would try this patch, although I am not sure I matched your indent style,
it is a bit strange:
>From d5d8f81fe7b0b7b9e91ae97611e4929821e9a564 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marcus Meissner
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:20:25 +0100
Subjec
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 01:34:28PM +0100, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Marcus Meissner writes:
>
> > buffer and size need to be either 0 at the same time or not,
> > otherwise this breaks up. Windows is inconsistent (either crashes
> > or returns invalids), so we can ju
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 08:06:32PM +0100, Jacek Caban wrote:
> On 12/16/09 7:50 PM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> >On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 07:30:22PM +0100, Paul Vriens wrote:
> >>On 12/15/2009 09:16 PM, Jacek Caban wrote:
> >>>---
> >>>dlls/urlmon/binding.c |
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 07:30:22PM +0100, Paul Vriens wrote:
> On 12/15/2009 09:16 PM, Jacek Caban wrote:
>> ---
>> dlls/urlmon/binding.c | 6 +
>> dlls/urlmon/tests/url.c | 58 ++
>> 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>
>
> Hi Jacek,
>
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:11:59PM +0200, Anssi Hannula wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I see that Wine has recently started to always request installation of
> Gecko, and that it is recommended to use a distribution provided package.
>
> We do not yet provide a wine-gecko package in Mandriva, but we'd like
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 05:21:30PM -0500, Steven Edwards wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Austin English
> wrote:
> > The other neat thing is that it will run git fetch in a loop every 30
> > minutes (again, overridable), so that you can run it in the morning
> > while waiting for AJ to
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 09:16:52PM -0600, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> My German is inadequate and there are no instructions for Karmic users
> there at the moment.
I sent one just now. Also updated de/download.template
Ciao, Marcus
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:29:51PM +0100, Ove Kaaven wrote:
> Jacek Caban skrev:
> > Well, I hope that a side effect of installation during wineprefix
> > creation is that it will force packagers to package gecko
>
> You can't *force* the creation of packages which would likely fail to
> meet the
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 05:08:21PM +0100, Jacek Caban wrote:
> Well, I hope that a side effect of installation during wineprefix
> creation is that it will force packagers to package gecko The
> brutal true is that we had a very bad situation for a long time. I
> can see three types of Wine users:
gic to arrive here and in
> case of wglsharelists it also performs the filtering.
Do I understand right that this is actually something we should mark
as FALSE or IGNORE in Coverity?
Ciao, Marcus
> Roderick
>
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Marcus Meissner
> wrot
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:52:04AM +0100, Julius Schwartzenberg wrote:
> Dan Kegel wrote:
> >Julius wrote:
> >>With one file however (GOODTIME.AVI from the win95 cd) I get this
> >>error after about a second:
> >>err:heap:HEAP_ValidateInUseArena Heap 0x11: in-use arena 0x184420
> >>next block h
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:13:06AM +0100, joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> AJ wrote in
> http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-November/079575.html
> >If there is proper synchronization you don't need
> >volatile, and if there isn't volatile won't magically fix it.
>
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:05:49AM +1100, Ben Klein wrote:
> 2009/11/11 Michael Stefaniuc :
> > For fedora it will not be possible to do a special 32bit compile on the
> > x86_64
> > arch.
>
> Wait ... no gcc -m32 on Fedora x86_64?
>
> > Hence the only way is to have the default x86_32 version a
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 04:53:31PM +0100, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
> > "Henri" == Henri Verbeet writes:
>
> Henri> 2009/11/9 Uwe Bonnes :
> >> Can anybody help with the flaw in my implementation? Or did anything
> >> change in wine?
> >>
> Henri> I'm not sure if anything changed
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 06:14:34PM -0700, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> >
> > Am 25.10.2009 um 10:57 schrieb Scott Ritchie:
> >> Many apps don't need to view the user folder for documents but also
> >> employ programmable scripting engines - a good example are games. It
> >> wou
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 02:46:25PM +0100, Huw Davies wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 03:36:21PM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 01:50:51PM +0100, Huw Davies wrote:
> > > +if(src_type & DBTYPE_VECTOR || dst_type & DBTYPE_VECTOR) return
>
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 01:50:51PM +0100, Huw Davies wrote:
> ---
> dlls/oledb32/convert.c | 231
> +-
> dlls/oledb32/tests/convert.c | 10 --
> 2 files changed, 228 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/dlls/oledb32/convert.c b/dlls/oledb3
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 04:48:24PM -0500, Jeremy White wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> It's now close enough to November that you can't blow
> this email off .
>
> We've got all the info here:
> http://wiki.winehq.org/WineConf2009
>
> Our challenge this year is that we're managing the booking,
> so we
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 07:21:03PM -0700, chris ahrendt wrote:
> [/home/cahrendt/wine-git/dlls/msvcrt/tests/file.c:982]: (error)
> Deallocating a deallocated pointer: stream2
> [/home/cahrendt/wine-git/dlls/msvcrt/tests/file.c:966]: (error) Resource
> leak: stream3
> [/home/cahrendt/wine-git/dlls
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 11:20:08AM -0700, chris ahrendt wrote:
> [../wine-git/dlls/wineoss.drv/mmaux.c:150]: (error) Resource leak: mixer
> [../wine-git/dlls/wineoss.drv/mmaux.c:211]: (error) Resource leak: mixer
Is a bug, patch sent.
> [../wine-git/programs/oleview/pane.c:152]: (error) Possible
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 02:16:40PM -0700, chris ahrendt wrote:
> Ok CPPCheck guys have repired the false positive but now get this:
>
> $ ./cppcheck -q -a ../wine/wine/dlls/wineoss.drv/mixer.c
> ../wine/wine/dlls/wineoss.drv/mixer.c:576: (error) Resource leak: mixer
> ../wine/wine/dlls/wineoss.dr
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:52:48PM +0200, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
> Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> > Marcus Meissner writes:
> >
> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 09:07:29PM +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> >>> Austin English writes:
> >>>
> &g
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 09:07:29PM +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Austin English writes:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Juan Lang wrote:
> >>> All the more reason to use the existing libmpg123 instead of trying to
> >>> maintain our own version, IMO.
> >>
> >> Aric already explained t
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 06:36:36PM -0700, chris ahrendt wrote:
>
> [../wine-git/dlls/ntdll/server.c:802]: (error) Resource leak: fd
I do not fully understand the code (keep fd open to have to lock
existing?), but it is in a fatal exit path.
> [../wine-git/tools/fnt2bdf.c:219]: (error) Resource l
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:24:50AM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:17:37AM +0200, Paul Vriens wrote:
> > Hi Marcus,
> >
> > I've noticed some strange output with transl:
> >
> > http://source.winehq.org/transl/resource.php?lang=013
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:17:37AM +0200, Paul Vriens wrote:
> Hi Marcus,
>
> I've noticed some strange output with transl:
>
> http://source.winehq.org/transl/resource.php?lang=013%3A00&resfile=dlls%2Fgphoto2.ds&type=5&id=1025&compare=
>
> When I look at the defined resources for the first dialog
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 11:20:54AM +0200, marco wrote:
> Hin-Tak Leung schreef:
>> --- On Sat, 4/7/09, marco wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I make the mandriva packages and put them on sourceforge.
>>>
>>> But sourceforge changed there layout and now I can not
>>> longer find the
>>> button t
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 05:29:39PM +0200, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> > Here:
> > /home/marcus/projects/wine/dlls/d3d9/device.c: In
> > Funktion »reset_enum_callback«:
> Does the attached patch fix the issue?
Yes it does.
Ciao, Marcus
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 04:30:30PM +0200, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 14. Juni 2009 14:26:53 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
> > Hi,
> >
> > gcc 4.5trunk warned that we do not handle case 7 (D3DRTYPE_INDEXBUFFER),
> > so add it here too.
> There's a reason w
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 01:46:31PM +0200, Paul Vriens wrote:
> Marcus Meissner wrote:
>> +lend2:
>> TRACE("%d <--\n", bSuccess);
>> return bSuccess;
>> }
> Hi Marcus,
>
> After AJ's remark you marked this Coverity one as "
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:56:28PM +0200, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> Hello (mostly wine package maintainers),
>
> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 05:07:55PM +0200, Massimo Del Fedele wrote:
> > James McKenzie ha scritto:
> >> Good work. Have you started to think about how to get this into Wine
> >> where AJ wi
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:44:30AM -0700, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> Ubuntu 9.04's new notification system is really nice and non obtrusive,
> however it can still get in the way if you need the entire screen.
> Accordingly, the notifications system has been designed to not draw
> notifications when
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 09:16:17PM +0200, remi.assai...@free.fr wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm submitting the PulseAudio patch from Arthur Talyor.
> As most distros have PulseAudio by default Wine should provide upstream
> support.
> Both Fedora and Mandriva have included this work and it is reporte
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 08:45:18PM +1000, Robert Lunnon wrote:
> I get this error under solaris building wine.
> Any clues would be welcome (Things have probably changed a lot since I last
> hacked on Wine)
>
> make[2]: Entering directory `/export/home/src/wine2004/wine/dlls/kernel32'
> ../../tool
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:02:16PM +0100, Rolf Kalbermatter wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html and let me know if it
> > detects your distro properly, I'll fix it up as needed.You're running
>
> Firefox 3 on an unknown dis
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:47:16AM -0600, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:24:09 -0800
> Dan Kegel wrote:
>
> >
> > Can we add in a line at the top saying
> > "Stable version 1.0.1 of Wine can usually be installed
> > just like any other Linux application using your
> > package
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 09:33:01PM +1100, Ben Klein wrote:
> 2009/2/18 IneedAname :
> > Why not make Wine honor the noexe flag on the mount?
>
> This might not be a bad idea, if it's possible. Make Wine refuse to
> run apps on noexec filesystems.
Likely will break installing all DVD/CD Software ;
Hi,
A week ago I went to Bruessel / Bruxelles in Belgium to the largest
opensource developer conference in Europa, FOSDEM 2009.
openSUSE has a developer room there the last years and we fill
our time by holding talks, mostly concerning openSUSE and stuff
that we do for the distribution and what o
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 04:49:03PM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> I've been slowly finishing my cebit presentation. The current draft is at
> http://kegel.com/cebit/
>
> It now talks briefly about winetricks,
> and uses firefox and safari as examples
> of installing and running platinum and bronze
>
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 09:35:26AM -0500, Steve Brown wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
>
> > Ben Klein wrote:
> >> This is not a problem with Wine, this is OpenSUSE breaking the
> >> environment when sudo is called. Remember, Wine is not the only X11
> >> app out there. Others
Hi Florian,
You are calling get_timer_val(3) in ioports.c
(if (chan == 3) ... going down to get_timer_val(chan))
Howver, tmr_8253 is just a 3 element array, so [3] will run over the end,
Is your code right? The change comes from this commit:
commit edbd4885542e4545439906df950a68dc48e70
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 03:53:04PM +, Rob Shearman wrote:
> 2009/2/4 Marcus Meissner :
> > @@ -442,7 +442,7 @@ static LPWSTR get_url(void)
> >
> > if(size > sizeof(httpW) && !memcmp(url, httpW, sizeof(httpW))) {
> > strcatW(url, v_formatW);
&
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 02:15:04PM -0600, Austin English wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Targetbuffer length must not be -1.
> >
> > Ciao, Marcus
> > ---
> > dlls/mshtml/editor.c |2 +-
>
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 09:48:01AM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> I'm going to be giving a Wine presentation at
> Cebit next month. You can see a draft of the
> presentation at
> http://kegel.com/wine/cebit2009/talk.html
> (I will say lots more than is written there; the
> slides are kept simple on pu
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 03:25:43PM +0100, Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
> On Sa, 2009-01-31 at 11:09 +0100, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > -EnumPrintersA(PRINTER_ENUM_LOCAL, NULL, 5, NULL, 0, &needed,
> > &num);
> > -if(needed) {
> > +if (EnumPrintersA(P
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 10:41:25AM +0100, Guillaume SH wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> You asked me to actually describe the security I am concerned about, so I am
> going for it :
>
> Imagine an ill-intentioned people, call it the attackers. By the mean of
> simply creating the following C application (ba
Hi,
Could someone please test those, I want to see if
the second or third crash on Windows to handle those
borderline cases.
Ciao & Thanks, Marcus
---
dlls/kernel32/tests/profile.c |7 +++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/kernel32/tests/profile.c b/d
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 12:22:33PM +0100, Paul Vriens wrote:
> Dan Kegel wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Marcus Meissner
>> wrote:
>>> There are actually more ... 815 - 870 (ca 57), and other types too.
>>
>> Whoops, right, I only got the first pa
Hi,
Coverity says something about array indices in CreatePolyPolygonRgn
and I see some code that looks bad:
if (((nbpolygons == 1) && ((*Count == 4) ||
((*Count == 5) && (Pts[4].x == Pts[0].x) && (Pts[4].y == Pts[0].y))) &&
(((Pts[0].y == Pts[1].y) &&
(Pts[1].x == Pts
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 01:42:38PM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> ... and here are the new issues since the last run, all of type FORWARD_NULL.
> If you don't have coverity access, see
> http://scan.coverity.com/devfaq.html#account
> for how to get it.
>
> 595 CryptDecodeObjectEx dlls/crypt32/d
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 09:44:45PM +0100, Paul Vriens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been in touch with David Maxwell and he looked into the 'lack' of
> reports since the end of October.
And there is now Run 278 :)
Ciao, Marcus
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 08:28:07AM +, David Gerard wrote:
> 2009/1/22 Austin English :
>
> > I wrote an article on common myths/mistruths
> > (http://lwn.net/Articles/315071/), went in today's release (will be
> > free to public in a week).
> > Looks like the editors went with the first draft,
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:56:24AM +0200, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Marcus Meissner
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:31:58AM -0800, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> >> This email was just sent to the Ubuntu developer list about a change to
&
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:31:58AM -0800, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> This email was just sent to the Ubuntu developer list about a change to
> D-Bus security in 9.04 -- do I need to create a D-Bus .conf file for
> Wine, or will the default policy suffice for us?
Sinc we are not receiving dbus events i
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 05:08:50PM +1100, Jeff Zaroyko wrote:
> http://philosecurity.org/2009/01/12/interview-with-an-adware-author
>
> In an interesting interview, former adware author Matt Knox mentions
> that he was able to run his adware client on Wine:
>
> S: In your professional opinion, ho
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 06:39:27PM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13606
>
> folks, hi,
>
> am running a configure script under wine, and it's _literally_ one to
> two seconds per sh.exe instance. i started running ./configure over
> two hours
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 10:14:10PM -0500, Nicholas LaRoche wrote:
> On a standard installation of Fedora 10 address space randomization is
> enabled by default. The base address of a process started by wine seems
> to change.. and it is easy to see when loading Dlls and checking their
> base add
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 08:36:07PM +0100, Pavel Troller wrote:
> Hi!
> Due to changes in Linux kernel include file structure, the following patch
> is necessary to compile wine with the 2.6.28 kernel:
>
> --- wine/dlls/ntdll/serial.c.old 2009-01-03 19:31:17.0 +0100
> +++ wine/dlls/n
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 07:52:10PM +0100, Stefan Reimer wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 11:14:52PM +0100, Stefan Reimer wrote:
> I am using gentoo hardened:
>
> gcc (Gentoo Hardened 4.3.2-r7 p1.5, ssp, fortify, pie-10.2.0) 4.3.2 glibc 2.8
>
> Using gcc -v gives:
>
> /usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-p
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 10:11:23AM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> wine-1.1.12 has a couple regressions in it:
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16754
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16732
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16708
>
> Please consider either cherrypicking the fixes,
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 11:14:52PM +0100, Stefan Reimer wrote:
> Hi,
> to build wine using gcc 4.3 with enabled ssp (stack-smashing-protector)
> the following patch must be applied to loader/preloader.c
>
> see gcc source ./gcc/config/i386/i386.c around line 24391
>
> /* For 32-bit code we can sa
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 10:21:29AM +0100, Kai Blin wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 December 2008 23:55:56 Dan Kegel wrote:
> > http://enquiringmimes.com/wp/2008/12/30/a-rumor-we-hope-is-true/
> > said
> > "WINE is the famous, this-would-be-so-cool-if-it-only-actually-worked
> > way of running Windows on oth
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 11:19:35AM +0200, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Hi
>
> There are some older applications out there, which don't install or
> run correctly unless Wine is emulating the correct Windows version
> (eg. Windows 9x).
>
> At least Windows XP has the ability to use certain heuristics
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 07:30:53PM +0200, Pauli Nieminen wrote:
> This implementation provides easy access to rb-tree which should be used
> instead of hashmap
> if number of entries changes a lot of over time of execution.
> It should be simple to write hashtree based on this which uses hash valu
> It would be useful to have winetricks distributed in a deb/rpm
> package, so that you could install it easily to have it
> updated/managed by the package manager. This would provide the core
> support for installing applications run on wine via deb/rpm packages
> (that would depend on winetricks
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 05:45:21AM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Ubuntu is having a meeting next week to discuss
> how to more easily grant users access to third
> party repositories (like wine's, perhaps).
>
> I've got a meeting wiki up at
> http://wiki.winehq.org/TrustingThirdPartyRepositories
> It
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 06:58:37PM +0100, Kai Blin wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Coverity is hosting a telco tomorrow about some new technology they're going
> to roll out to projects. I'm planning to attend, and would like to bring up
> any issues we're currently having in the Q&A session.
>
> Issues
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 10:24:56AM -0500, Susan Cragin wrote:
> I did the regression test. But how legitimate are the results if the problem
> is the new gcc that I downloaded recently, and not wine?
> gcc (Ubuntu 4.3.2-2ubuntu5) 4.3.3 20081129 (prerelease)
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/wine$ git bise
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 01:11:05PM -0800, Jeremy Drake wrote:
> In order to implement OleLoadPictureFile and OleLoadPictureFileEx, it will
> be necessary to change their entries in oleaut32.spec from stub to
> stdcall. The stdcall syntax wants a list of parameter types, which puts
> these function
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 03:11:52PM +0800, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> "ricardo filipe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --- a/dlls/cabinet/fci.c
> > +++ b/dlls/cabinet/fci.c
> > @@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ static cab_ULONG fci_get_checksum(const void *pv, UINT
> > cb, CHECKSUM seed)
> > case 2:
> >
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 12:20:37PM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Wonder why patchwatcher was down for 12 hours? It
> seems to have been a kernel problem.
>
> This is on an Ubuntu 8.10 32 bit Core 2 Duo system
> on a P5K Pro motherboard, with a PCI-E NVidia card.
> I have the proprietary Nvidia driver
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:28:37AM +0100, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
> Austin English wrote:
> > This series of patches fixes most of the new warnings generated in gcc
> > 4.3.2. There's one issue left, but I'm not quite sure what should be
> > done on that one.
> > diff --git a/tools/fnt2bdf.c b/too
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 02:36:02PM +0100, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> > This summer Maarten Lankhorst did some basic work on win64 support but
> > for the rest no work has been done it for a long time. I'm not sure
> > what Maarten exactly did but but there is a lot of work to be done
> > before it wi
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 10:31:11AM -0600, Evil Jay wrote:
> I can see where this would be useful for building on some platforms, but
> doesn't "sudo apt-get build-dep wine" work fine (for the most part) for
> Ubuntu?
>
> The last time I compiled on a fresh *buntu, I recall using build-dep and
> th
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 07:19:46AM -0500, Jeremy White wrote:
> > Right. So the forum software is broken, and all of the Wine devs would
> > rather
> > fix Wine than the forums? Sounds like a good case for ditching the forums.
>
> I disagree violently. The case for the forums is clear; users pr
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:41:00AM +0200, Hans Leidekker wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 October 2008 19:06:20 Juan Lang wrote:
>
> > But you don't check whether those conditions are true, and you march
> > ahead and install the certificate into the root store whether or not
> > they are true. I'm sorry,
Hi,
We won in the
SourceForge.net2008 Community Choice Awards
https://sourceforge.net/community/cca08/
in the Category: "Most Likely to Be Ambiguously and Baselessly Accused of
Patent Violation"
:)
Ciao, Marcus
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 09:52:06PM -0400, Chris Ahrendt wrote:
> Ok I have threaded through ddraw_test adding as I had them fail a check
> and a fix in dsurface.c test. The test now fails when the CreateSurface
> fails. Before this there were several point in the test where the return
> status
On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 05:41:31PM -0500, Austin English wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Marcus Meissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This fixes http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9008
> > by also filtering out the backbuffer flag.
>
Hi,
I am suspecting that in IDirectDraw1 the behaviour
regarding backbuffer creation might change if we have
a just created frontbuffer of the same size.
(This is similar to behaviour shown by bulanci.exe
of http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9008 )
Can someone please try this on Windows ple
Hi,
http://gallery.kuschelt.net/main.php?g2_view=core.ShowItem&g2_itemId=163676&g2_page=3
has my pictures of Wine Conf.
Ciao, Marcus
Hi,
I get these new errors after todays git update:
monthcal.c:677: Test failed: Expected 65542, got 65536
monthcal.c:677: Test failed: Expected 65542, got 65536
monthcal.c:677: Test failed: Expected 65542, got 65536
monthcal.c:677: Test failed: Expected 65542, got 65536
monthcal.c:677: Test fail
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 01:26:37PM -0700, Lei Zhang wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Nikolay Sivov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Lei Zhang wrote:
> >> @@ -512,8 +512,11 @@ GpStatus WINGDIPAPI GdipCreateTextureIA(GpImage
> >> *image,
> >> IPicture_get_CurDC(image->picture, &hdc);
>
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 12:08:22AM +0100, Rob Shearman wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This will be talked about in more detail at WineConf tomorrow, but I
> just thought I'd throw this out there as a bit of background to any
> discussions.
>
> Adding annotations to function declarations allows Prefast to p
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 04:35:45PM +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> "Dan Kegel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Agreed, to an extent. A user who is trying to compile with a really
> > whacky toolchain (say, a C compiler on an Amiga, a mainframe, or a
> > wristwatch)
> > should expect some e
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 11:08:20AM +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Marcus Meissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > @@ -91,11 +91,11 @@ typedef HRESULT (STDMETHODCALLTYPE
> > MAPILOGONEX)(ULONG_PTR,LPSTR,LPSTR,ULONG,LPMA
> > typedef MAPILOGONEX *LPMAPILOGONEX
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:50:42PM +0200, Michael Karcher wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 10.09.2008, 22:38 +0200 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
> > I just tested some code with -O0 and the functioncall still gets
> > optimized away. This is with gcc 4.1 and gcc 4.3. gcc 2.95 does not.
&
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:27:06PM +0200, Michael Karcher wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 10.09.2008, 22:12 +0200 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
> > This approach will not work with -O0, which might be a problem.
> If I were to decide, that would kill the patch. I really like to
> recompil
201 - 300 of 861 matches
Mail list logo
