On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 05:49:14PM -0700, James McKenzie wrote:
Austin English wrote:
On Dec 31, 2007 6:10 PM, Maarten Lankhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The situation isn't improved by the fact that bugs are reopened by those
persons after minimal additions. Perhaps we should have a bug
On Jan 1, 2008 9:33 AM, Jan Zerebecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We could add flags for needs more information and perhaps one
for reproducible bug report with enough initial information.
(A flag is something that can be requested to be set and can then
be granted or denied by someone who was
Hi,
just like last year we did an audit of all the bugs in bugzilla.
I think this year also we should do the same, the bugs are growing
large and older bugs are being neglected.
just wanted to say that we need to check all the old open bugs, and
test them/ask the user for status.
Close the bug
I've been doing this a little bit at a time for a while. I just wanted
to check base and make sure all on the same page. For starters, here's
a search of all bugs not touched in 6 months:
On Dec 31, 2007 5:56 PM, Vijay Kiran Kamuju [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We would be doing this for 1-2 months as the Wine 1.0 release might
happen in may be next 6-7 months time. We might expect lotta bugzilla
activity as wine goes out of beta.
and all the old bugs will be ignored and bugs grow
Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
Vijay Kiran Kamuju schreef:
just like last year we did an audit of all the bugs in bugzilla.
I think this year also we should do the same, the bugs are growing
large and older bugs are being neglected.
just wanted to say that we need to check all the old open
Austin English wrote:
On Dec 31, 2007 6:10 PM, Maarten Lankhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The situation isn't improved by the fact that bugs are reopened by those
persons after minimal additions. Perhaps we should have a bug
moderation? Only allow bugs that follow the criterion, then have
On Dec 31, 2007 6:42 PM, James McKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree. If you cannot find the application or a demo version to work
with, how can you fix the
bug. Logs and other helpers go a long way. Maybe an intro page as to
what is needed and how
to get it. This will become more and
On Dec 31, 2007 6:49 PM, Austin English [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 31, 2007 6:42 PM, James McKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree. If you cannot find the application or a demo version to work
with, how can you fix the
bug. Logs and other helpers go a long way. Maybe an intro
