>From http://www.codesampler.com/disclaimer.htm:
"Kevin R. Harris retains all ownership rights to all documents
(including but not limited to image, html, text files, and archived
source code) on "the Web Site" (www.CodeSampler.com). Use of the Web
Site is governed by applicable copyright law. " .
Detlef Riekenberg web.de> writes:
>
>
> Louis, please do not give up and reopen the bug.
> You got already some comments, and I want to give some more Ideas.
>
> - You told, that you reuse the code for the cube from the internet.
> That is a no-go because of copyright and license issues!
>
On Mi, 2008-07-02 at 23:02 +, Louis Lenders wrote:
> so for now i'd have to guess :
> 1. no need for a dxdiag in wine
> 2. my patches are too crappy to respond to.
>
> In both cases it's useless to leave thebug i opened for missing dxdiag open,
> so i'll abandon it (bug 14118)
Louis, pleas
>Here's what you said in your original patch:
>> - code for spinning cube was partially based on spinning cube code
>>scattered all over the internet
>>-rest was ripped of winecfg
>> - There' s a problem while minizing the d3d-window, but running it in
>>wine-0.9.22 it all goes fine, so this
Louis Lenders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here;s the whole patch that i sent a while ago, but i was advised after that
> to
> first sent a simple stub because the patch was too large:
>
> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=14343
Here's what you said in your original patch:
> - code for
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Louis Lenders
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Juan Lang gmail.com> writes:
>
>>
>> > http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-June/056911.html
>>
>> Ah. That's not enough to judge where your patches are going.
> I already explained, see http://bugs.winehq.org
> I already explained, see http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=14342 and
> http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-June/056659.html. That's
> what
> i was intended to go to.
Yes, but such a large patch is hard to read. See e.g. how I submitted
inetmib1.dll, beginning here:
http://
Juan Lang gmail.com> writes:
>
> > http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-June/056911.html
>
> Ah. That's not enough to judge where your patches are going.
I already explained, see http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=14342 and
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-
> http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-June/056911.html
Ah. That's not enough to judge where your patches are going. A
series of patches, adding a stub program, then adding a little more to
it, and so on, would help judge the final product, while considering
each piece independently
Juan Lang gmail.com> writes:
>
> Hi Louis,
>
>
> Apparently they were never received in the first place. At least, I
> don't see them on the wine-patches archive. Maybe you should resend?
> --Juan
>
>
Hi Juan:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-June/056911.html
Hi Louis,
> Hi Detlef (and Juan) , thanks for the response. I sent in a simple stub (and
> two
> other patches on top of that i need to get something useful in dxdiag) but
> apparently they are not accepted either.
Apparently they were never received in the first place. At least, I
don't see th
Detlef Riekenberg web.de> writes:
>
> Why not?
> - empty stub
> - the property-sheet
> - demo-window with an empty (in memory) Bitmap
> - the wine-logo as bitmap
> - spinning cube
> reorder, when needed
>
Hi Detlef (and Juan) , thanks for the response. I sent in a simple stub (and two
other
On Mo, 2008-06-30 at 10:15 -0500, Austin English wrote:
> > Instead of simple stub, this patch also adds the (simplified) d3d test
> > like seen in native dxdiag, so users can test if their d3d is setup
> > correctly. Screenshot can be seen here:
> > http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=14
of
> sending them in...
>
> - Forwarded Message
> From: Louis. Lenders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 26 June, 2008 3:20:04 AM
> Subject: Re: programs: add rudimentary dxdiag
>
> Hi, some apps like Gameshadow (http://www.gameshadow.com/) check
> Hi, any comments on this one?
> btw, is there a reason i never ever receive any comments on my patches when
> they are rejected? If so, please tell me, that'll save me a lot of time of
> sending them in...
I'll bite. One comment for both questions: it's too big. No comment
from AJ usually me
L PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 26 June, 2008 3:20:04 AM
Subject: Re: programs: add rudimentary dxdiag
Hi, some apps like Gameshadow (http://www.gameshadow.com/) check for
dxdiag.exe, and give an error if it's not found, so wine needs its own.
Instead of simple stub, this patch also adds the (
16 matches
Mail list logo
