I'd argue that if you are running with 69000 connections, you could be
running into multiple problems.
I cant comment on StarOS specifically, but one of the reasons we upgarded
our servers from 2.4Kernal to 2.6 kernel was because of connection tracking
table size.
2.6 kernels allowed management
ick Olsen
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 8:24 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] NAT Limits on StarOS/Mikrotik
I would assume its possible, On the mikrotik router under connection
tracking, Maybe drop some of the times? No clue if that will really hurt
something or not, but it sh
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 01:47 -0500, Scott Lambert wrote:
> Has IPv6 come to the Mikrotik/StarOS world?
Mikrotik, yes. StarOS, I don't know.
--
* Butch Evans * Professional Network Consultation*
* http://www.b
evard Wireless
(321) 205-1100 x106
From: "Scott Lambert"
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 2:47 AM
To: "WISPA General List"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] NAT Limits on StarOS/Mikrotik
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:30:55PM -0600, Matt Larsen - Lists wrote:
> connection
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:30:55PM -0600, Matt Larsen - Lists wrote:
> connections coming into it. This server is running StarOS. We have
> about 1700 subs NATted behind a single IP address on this server.
>
> Behind it, I have a Mikrotik server that is handling all traffic
> coming into th
Never seen a lot of people behind NAT so I don't know what you would see.
If you're concerned about socket capacity you can srcnat different IP
ranges to a different public IP.
On 9/29/09, Matt Larsen - Lists wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We've been doing some troubleshooting of some occasional issues
Hello all,
We've been doing some troubleshooting of some occasional issues with
NATed customers and started to wonder if we have reached the limits of
what we can do with a single NAT server.
Right now, I have one NAT server that has two Internet backbone
connections coming into it. This ser
