[WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

Andrews Antenna P3F-52-NXA 5.8GHz backhaul radio died today because of a power surge. Old Proxim gear, 2 x T1. I wanted some feedback from vendors/users of what they are using. I need to keep it under $5K if possible. Link distance: 8.3 miles Antennas: Andrews P3F-52-NXA -

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

A pair of Mikrotiks, radio cards and all, under $1K and you should be able to do 20Mbit. Pat O'Connor wrote: Andrews Antenna P3F-52-NXA 5.8GHz backhaul radio died today because of a power surge. Old Proxim gear, 2 x T1. I wanted some feedback from vendors/users of what they are using.

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

I have this installed and like it... Two RBs (currently 532 but today you'll want 433ah) Two xr5 or compex wlm54ag Dual polarity 5ghz dish Butch's blog and/or help in usinf OSPF to concatinate the two links. I would guess 400 for electronics, 400 for two dishes and 200 for materials. On 1/8/09,

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

ISPA General List" Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 8:39 PM Subject: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations > > > Andrews Antenna P3F-52-NXA > > 5.8GHz backhaul radio died today because of a power surge. Old Proxim > gear, 2 x T1. I wanted some feedback from vendors/

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

Easy. Airaya. Easy to set up, rock solid reliable. You can get them from ec/hutton. marlon - Original Message - From: "Pat O'Connor" To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 5:39 PM Subject: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

Redline AN80i On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Pat O'Connor wrote: > > > Andrews Antenna P3F-52-NXA > > 5.8GHz backhaul radio died today because of a power surge. Old Proxim > gear, 2 x T1. I wanted some feedback from vendors/users of what they > are using. I need to keep it under $5K if possi

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

I love the an50s. Redline support is unbelieveable. The 80s have more capability and are half the price, though I haven't gotten my hands on them. On 1/8/09, John McDowell wrote: > Redline AN80i > > On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Pat O'Connor wrote: > >> >> >> Andrews Antenna P3F-52-NXA >> >>

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

We're pretty exclusive to the AN80 on backhauls...just deployed a new one this week. And yes, Redline support is awesome On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:25 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > I love the an50s. Redline support is unbelieveable. The 80s have more > capability and are half the price, though I have

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

Have had good results with radwin ... - Original Message - From: "John McDowell" To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 12:50 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations > We're pretty exclusive to the AN80 on backhau

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

second this!! :) So far seeing good results as well with the new R5Hs and N-Stream too ;) -- * Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer WISPA Board Member - wispa.org Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services* *O

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

rsday, January 08, 2009 6:40 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations Andrews Antenna P3F-52-NXA 5.8GHz backhaul radio died today because of a power surge. Old Proxim gear, 2 x T1. I wanted some feedback from vendors/users of what they are using. I need to ke

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

Can you share a brief explanation of what all Mikrotik N-Stream does? I know you can set up two radios (one up and one down) but I do not know what else it can do. We have some Mikrotik in the air now and would like to start taking advantage of this if it has real advantages. Thank you, Scriv On

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

to swap out the feedhorn for the dual pol feedhorn... > > Daniel White > 3-dB Networks > http://www.3dbnetworks.com > > > -Original Message- > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On > Behalf Of Pat O'Connor > Sent: Thursday, Janu

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

the dual pol feedhorn... >> >> Daniel White >> 3-dB Networks >> http://www.3dbnetworks.com >> >> >> -Original Message----- >> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On >> Behalf Of Pat O'Connor >> Sent:

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

Broadband - Original Message - From: "Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net" To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 11:11 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations > Like I said, if you just need data, then MT can't be beat on this

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

dband > > > - Original Message - > From: "Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net" > To: "WISPA General List" > Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 11:11 AM > Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations > > > >> Like I said, if y

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net wrote: > Yes you have to have a good processor, it does compression. I also > believe it does MPPP as well, and larger frame sizes as well to get > higher speeds. Hence, processor usage is key. When I was testing this - pretty informally, two radios set on the fl

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

David, Just for info here but it's possible that your signals were so loud that the receivers were being overloaded. That drives them bananas... jack David E. Smith wrote: Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net wrote: Yes you have to have a good processor, it does compression. I also

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

With that inside like that, you can get reflections etc. It does the compression and M3P I'm sure as well. It should not incraase the latency that much and should not "fluctuate" like that normally. -- * Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer WISPA Boa

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

yep, anything more than -40 is BAD. better tests are around -55 or so.. -- * Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer WISPA Board Member - wispa.org Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services* *Office*: 314-735-0270 *

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

nd inexpensive. Tom DeReggi RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband - Original Message - From: "Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net" To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 12:55 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Re

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

d was key. Tom DeReggi RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband - Original Message - From: "Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net" To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 1:10 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommend

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

quot; Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 1:10 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations > yep, anything more than -40 is BAD. better tests are around -55 or so.. > > -- > * Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer > WISPA B

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

> Andrews Antenna P3F-52-NXA > > 5.8GHz backhaul radio died today because of a power surge. Old Proxim > gear, 2 x T1. I wanted some feedback from vendors/users of what they > are using. I need to keep it under $5K if possible. > > Link distance: 8.3 miles > > Antennas: Andrews P3F-52-NXA http:

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 2:36 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations > Andrews Antenna P3F-52-NXA > > 5.8GHz backhaul radio died today because of a power surge. Old Proxim > gear, 2 x T1. I wanted some feedback

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

I just lent a pair of Bullet5 units to a friend who is planning to replace some old upconverted Alvarion BH units on a 26 mile link with 2' dishes. That should be an interesting test. Matt Larsen vistabeam.com Matt wrote: >> Andrews Antenna P3F-52-NXA >> >> 5.8GHz backhaul radio died today b

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

Please let us know how it worked Sent from my iPhone On Jan 9, 2009, at 7:40 PM, Matt Larsen - Lists wrote: > I just lent a pair of Bullet5 units to a friend who is planning to > replace some old upconverted Alvarion BH units on a 26 mile link > with 2' > dishes. That should be an interes

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

-Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Matt Larsen - Lists Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 6:40 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations I just lent a pair of Bullet5 units to a friend

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

I've got a 5GHz bullet talking to a WRAP on a 1 mile test link. It's working very well. I dont know about 8 miles though... -RickG On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Matt wrote: >> Andrews Antenna P3F-52-NXA >> >> 5.8GHz backhaul radio died today because of a power surge. Old Proxim >> gear, 2 x T1

Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations

ists" To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 7:40 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.8GHz Backhaul Radio Recommendations >I just lent a pair of Bullet5 units to a friend who is planning to > replace some old upconverted Alvarion BH units on a 26 mile link with 2&