RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] RADIUS Server preference for 10K+ Client Environments?

Hi Julian, Out of curiosity, can you describe what Juniper's replacement for SBR is missing? Thanks- Lee -Original Message- From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Julian Y Koh Sent: Tuesday, November

RE: Cisco Wireless- WCS versus NCS

Just finished migrating. Overall I'd say it's a big improvement in performance, presentation, & reporting. So far my only disappointment has been running into this fun bug: Bug ID: CSCtt94353 Heatmaps are not drawn after migration from WCS to NCS So to get heatmaps to show again each map had

RE: New Cisco WLC 7.0.220.0 not supported in NCS

While I can't really add anything to the thread, I will admit to being jealous that Trent has a cool logo. From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Hurt,Trenton William Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 3:24 PM To:

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] RADIUS Server preference for 10K+ Client Environments?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed Nov 02 2011 08:09:21 Central Time, Lee H Badman wrote: > > Out of curiosity, can you describe what Juniper's replacement for SBR is > missing? Biggest thing was IP pools, since we assign IP addresses to our traditional VPN clients via RADIUS

RE: Cisco Wireless- WCS versus NCS

Ah- now that is one of those little tidbits that will be great to know as we migrate. Call me cynical, but I've come to pretty much expect some sort of bug at every turn. From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Robe

RE: Logos

Poor Lee. We got one too, very recently :-) [cid:image002.png@01CC9942.900A30E0] As to the original thread, we’re using FreeRADIUS with a load balancer in front. Around 9000-10,000 concurrent users, but relatively few of those are on WPA. There are some backends that can be problematic with Fre

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Logos

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed Nov 02 2011 08:34:05 Central Time, "Voll, Toivo" wrote: > > Poor Lee. We got one too, very recently :-) > We've been using the one at forever. I can't decide if I really like it or just ki

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] RADIUS Server preference for 10K+ Client Environments?

Hi Lee, > For those of you with large (10,000 + users) RADIUS deployments, what > servers are you using and what are your points of pain and/or > appreciation? We're using Radiator. No real points of pain; what we appreciate are the features to manipulate requests and support all kinds of authent

WLC: persistent debug?

Hi everyone, Calling on your collective knowledge... since we moved most of our wireless from Cisco fat to Cisco lightweight, I've been rather annoyed with the lack of usable logging by the WLCs. We're currently running WLC 5508 controllers and I would like to track all association attempts, disa

NAT Logging Storage Requirements

We are looking at having to move our wireless net's to private address space and NAT/PAT ing traffic from the wireless nets to the Internet. What are you using to store your NAT logs (Systems, Disk space, Database)? Thanks. -Neil -- Neil Johnson Network Engineer The University of Iowa Phone: 3

RE: New Cisco WLC 7.0.220.0 not supported in NCS

Thanks although I can't take credit for the design. I will say that this logo is a huge hit on our campuses. We have door cling stickers with it printed on and put them on all of our building's exterior doors that we have pervasive wireless coverage in. This has really helped folks identify

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] RADIUS Server preference for 10K+ Client Environments?

We Freeradius on RH5.X supporting PEAP/MSCHAP with AD for dot1x and LDAP for VPN. We have two production wireless that see about 8000-9000 users per day 15000 over the month. no real pain points except some issues to resolve when RH gets upgraded. file permissions/SE Linux caused the most i

RE: New Cisco WLC 7.0.220.0 not supported in NCS

This new code fixes the blackberry torch issue with aggressive load balancing on the wlan. http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCtn74703 From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAU