Re: [Wireshark-users] Question on Decoding packet with inserted proprietary header

2007-03-13 Thread Small, James
> > Anyway, could be a useful Wireshark feature - if you agree let me know > > and I'll put it on the wish list. > > What would be nice would be a language to describe a packet format and > an interpreter for the language, so that a non-programmer could add a > dissector for simpler protocols. Ev

Re: [Wireshark-users] Install / Uninstall

2007-03-13 Thread Hans Nilsson
Checkinstall is a separate program, that makes uninstalling programs compiled from source much easier. Take a look: http://asic-linux.com.mx/~izto/checkinstall/index.php Basically you do: ./configure make checkinstall And if you want to uninstall it you can use the normal packet manager. On Tue

Re: [Wireshark-users] Question on Decoding packet withinsertedproprietary header

2007-03-13 Thread Anders Broman
-Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Small, James Skickat: den 13 mars 2007 20:27 Till: Community support list for Wireshark Ämne: Re: [Wireshark-users] Question on Decoding packet withinsertedproprietary header >> > I am dealing with packets th

Re: [Wireshark-users] Question on Decoding packet with insertedproprietary header

2007-03-13 Thread Guy Harris
Small, James wrote: > Anyway, could be a useful Wireshark feature - if you agree let me know > and I'll put it on the wish list. What would be nice would be a language to describe a packet format and an interpreter for the language, so that a non-programmer could add a dissector for simpler pro

Re: [Wireshark-users] Question on Decoding packet with insertedproprietary header

2007-03-13 Thread Small, James
> > I am dealing with packets that are modified by a vendor device. The > > packets are standard Ethernet frames with IP. Once the frames/packets > > traverse the Vendor device, a new proprietary header is inserted > > between the Ethernet header and the IP header. > > > > So, in a standard IP/Et

Re: [Wireshark-users] Install / Uninstall

2007-03-13 Thread Leonard, Thomas J
The error that caused this problem looked like this... ./wireshark 16:38:42 Err Duplicate protocol name "U_tcasw_mp_common Dissector Using GIOP API"! This might be caused by an inappropriate plugin or a development error. Aborted (core dumped) This was after attempting to compile with this new

Re: [Wireshark-users] Question on Decoding packet with inserted proprietary header

2007-03-13 Thread Stephen Fisher
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 02:12:51PM -0400, Small, James wrote: > I am dealing with packets that are modified by a vendor device. The > packets are standard Ethernet frames with IP. Once the frames/packets > traverse the Vendor device, a new proprietary header is inserted > between the Ethernet

Re: [Wireshark-users] Question on Decoding packet with insertedproprietary header

2007-03-13 Thread Anders Broman
Hi, Do the modified packet has it's own Ethertype? If so you could make a dissector for that ethertype that dissects the 34 byte header before passing the tvb to the IP dissector(it doesn't necessarily have to interpret the header). Best regards Anders -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: [EMAI

Re: [Wireshark-users] Install / Uninstall

2007-03-13 Thread Hans Nilsson
If you're compiling from source "checkinstall" is a great tool to use, but maybe it's too late for that. But maybe you could re-install using checkinstall and then remove it. On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:08:12 -0400, "Leonard, Thomas J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > We are currently having a problem with

[Wireshark-users] Question on Decoding packet with inserted proprietary header

2007-03-13 Thread Small, James
Hello, I am dealing with packets that are modified by a vendor device. The packets are standard Ethernet frames with IP. Once the frames/packets traverse the Vendor device, a new proprietary header is inserted between the Ethernet header and the IP header. So, in a standard IP/Ethernet packet,

[Wireshark-users] Install / Uninstall

2007-03-13 Thread Leonard, Thomas J
We are currently having a problem with our install. We had an issue with a plugin we created that caused a core dump referring to a duplicate dissector..even though there wasn't one we could readily find. Unless there was a relic we could not uncover? We attmepted to remove all wireshark files, th

Re: [Wireshark-users] STOP !!

2007-03-13 Thread Web and Co sprl - Patrick DERWAEL
Stephen, Many thanks for the info, I will try this version and give it a try !! _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Fisher Sent: mardi 13 mars 2007 1:21 To: Community support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] STOP !! This see