On 19/8/05 8:22 AM, "chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Safari 1.3 and 2.0 are supposed to be identical
>
> I was recently working on a site that errors out completely in
> Safari/Tiger but works great in Safari/Panther.
>
> The error in Tiger is "too many http requests" when downloading images
nt: Thursday, August 18, 2005 5:56 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Safari 1.3 vs Safari 2 differences
On 18 Aug 2005, at 9:35 pm, Jan Brasna wrote:
> Gamma correction, min-/mix-width/height, this is the most visible
> difference between 1.2.4 (maybe 1.3) and 2.0, but si
On 18 Aug 2005, at 9:35 pm, Jan Brasna wrote:
Gamma correction, min-/mix-width/height, this is the most visible
difference between 1.2.4 (maybe 1.3) and 2.0, but since everyone I
know has moved to Tiger, I don't assume this is a problem...
Safari 1.3 and 2.0 are supposed to be identical. The
Hi
I'm not sure, but given Safari and Konquerer run off the same base
(khtml) you could try searching the bugz database at opendarwin.org
and kde.org
http://bugzilla.opendarwin.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=specific&order=relevance+desc&bug_status=__all__&product=WebKit&content=
http://bugs.kde.or
Gamma correction, min-/mix-width/height, this is the most visible
difference between 1.2.4 (maybe 1.3) and 2.0, but since everyone I know
has moved to Tiger, I don't assume this is a problem...
--
Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: www.alphanumeric.cz | www.janbrasna.com
*
From: "Shane Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Oh no. Not another browser difference to account for. When does it
ever end? :)
(Please excuse me if this has been discussed before and I missed
it.)
Has anyone else been noticing differences on sites rendering
differently in Safari 1.3 vs Safari 2? I
Oh no. Not another browser difference to account for. When does it
ever end? :)
(Please excuse me if this has been discussed before and I missed it.)
Has anyone else been noticing differences on sites rendering
differently in Safari 1.3 vs Safari 2? I sure have in the 2 latest
sites I've
