Paul,
on Tuesday, January 31, 2006 at 11:39 wsg@webstandardsgroup.org wrote:
What's wrong with this?
The following are the days of the week
Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
regards
Martin
**
The discussion list for http://webstandard
Regrettably not. I'd also love some way to associate a header element
with content, much like fieldset's legend element does, but
unfortunately (or perhaps fortunately, because it'd be potentially
hellish to make work consistently with some automated content
management stuff!) no such thing exists.
Sarcasm Alert :)
Stephen.
On 31 Jan 2006, at 11:09, Martin Heiden wrote:
Paul,
on Tuesday, January 31, 2006 at 11:39 wsg@webstandardsgroup.org wrote:
What's wrong with this?
The following are the days of the week
Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
regards
Martin
**
On 31/01/2006, at 8:39 PM, Paul Collins wrote:
Just wondering if there is such a thing as a header tag for a HTML
list, or , such as the TH tag or the Summary tag for a table?
No, sadly. The only way to 'associate' a header with some following
content is to wrap the set in a div, or similar
G'day Paul,
I haven't done coding on this, however I think it may be possible by
setting a class for your bold heading with no bottom padding or margin
and then using an ordered list.
Regards,
Ric
Paul Collins wrote:
Paul Collins wrote:
Hello all.
Just wondering if there is such a thin
ginal Message -
From:
Stephen
Stagg
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 11:33
AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] list's with header
text
Sarcasm Alert :)Stephen.On 31 Jan 2006, at 11:09, Martin
Heiden wrote:> Paul,>> on Tuesday, January 31, 2
would work well though, just
a whim really.
Cheers mate
Paul
- Original Message -
From:
Ric Raftis
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 11:43
AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] list's with header
text
G'day Paul,I haven't done codin
> Lea de Groot
> Wouldn't
>
>
> be nice? :)
So what do you do when you have 2 or more elements that the heading refers to?
etc?
It's not really a scalable solution, IMHO.
As someone already mentioned, the source order should be enough to inform what
the heading refers to, without the ne
patrick wrote
"As someone already mentioned, the source order should be enough to inform
what the heading refers to, without the need for explicit association."
sorry i dont understand this could someone please explain?
-best
kvnmcwebn
**
Th
> kvnmcwebn
>> patrick wrote
>> "As someone already mentioned, the source order should be
>> enough to inform
>> what the heading refers to, without the need for explicit
>> association."
>
> sorry i dont understand this could someone please explain?
If you have a heading, followed by some oth
On 31/01/2006, at 10:54 PM, Patrick Lauke wrote:
It's not really a scalable solution, IMHO.
Possibly true, but it doesn't make the concept entirely useless.
As someone already mentioned, the source order should be enough to
inform what the heading refers to, without the need for explicit
hi,
for a vertical navigation bar with multiple headings like this:
Buncrana Town
Business Directory
Accomodation Directory
.
Community
Groups
Clubs
.
so on...
What is the proper heading to use(h1, h2,
I would use:
Buncrana Town
Community
Where 'bananas' is replaced with a semantically suitable name such as main for main navigation or supp for supplemental etc...
I would use h3 as long as it fits in with the rest of your mar
ok thanks,
just to clarify a point: what odds that the ul id have a semantically
suitable name-beside making sense to people working in the code after me?
-thanks again
kvnmcewbn
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Exactly for that point; IMHO decribing the content rather than the
presentation makes your markup easier to read, style and manage by
whomever - users, coders, accessibility tools, browsers, search
engines, and yourself, this is why web standards are so
important. Some interesting reading on sugge
15 matches
Mail list logo
