On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 02:48:26PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 03:57:22AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>> On 24.10.16 at 11:03, wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > It looks that it is last thing which blocks whole patch series.
> >
> > I don't think so - Andrew has (not via mail) a
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 03:57:22AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 24.10.16 at 11:03, wrote:
[...]
> > It looks that it is last thing which blocks whole patch series.
>
> I don't think so - Andrew has (not via mail) already indicated he'd
> like to comment on the not insignificant amount of a
Hi Jan,
On 12/10/16 13:59, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.10.16 at 14:51, wrote:
Hello Jan,
On 12/10/2016 12:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 11.10.16 at 15:39, wrote:
On 06/10/16 13:21, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.10.16 at 20:30, wrote:
On 30/09/2016 02:46, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.09.16 at 23:42, w
>>> On 24.10.16 at 11:03, wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 06:59:52AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 12.10.16 at 14:51, wrote:
>> > Hello Jan,
>> >
>> > On 12/10/2016 12:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> > On 11.10.16 at 15:39, wrote:
>> >>> On 06/10/16 13:21, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 0
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 06:59:52AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 12.10.16 at 14:51, wrote:
> > Hello Jan,
> >
> > On 12/10/2016 12:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 11.10.16 at 15:39, wrote:
> >>> On 06/10/16 13:21, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 05.10.16 at 20:30, wrote:
> > On 30/09/
>>> On 12.10.16 at 14:51, wrote:
> Hello Jan,
>
> On 12/10/2016 12:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 11.10.16 at 15:39, wrote:
>>> On 06/10/16 13:21, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 05.10.16 at 20:30, wrote:
> On 30/09/2016 02:46, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 29.09.16 at 23:42, wrote:
>
Hello Jan,
On 12/10/2016 12:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 11.10.16 at 15:39, wrote:
On 06/10/16 13:21, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.10.16 at 20:30, wrote:
On 30/09/2016 02:46, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.09.16 at 23:42, wrote:
+#else
+static void __init free_ebmalloc_unused_mem(void)
+{
+}
+#endif
>>> On 11.10.16 at 15:39, wrote:
> Hello Jan,
>
> On 06/10/16 13:21, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.10.16 at 20:30, wrote:
>>> On 30/09/2016 02:46, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 29.09.16 at 23:42, wrote:
> +#else
> +static void __init free_ebmalloc_unused_mem(void)
> +{
> +}
>>>
Hello Jan,
On 06/10/16 13:21, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.10.16 at 20:30, wrote:
On 30/09/2016 02:46, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.09.16 at 23:42, wrote:
+#else
+static void __init free_ebmalloc_unused_mem(void)
+{
+}
+#endif
Did you build test this for ARM? The function ought to be unused,
as .
>>> On 05.10.16 at 20:30, wrote:
> On 30/09/2016 02:46, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 29.09.16 at 23:42, wrote:
>>> +#else
>>> +static void __init free_ebmalloc_unused_mem(void)
>>> +{
>>> +}
>>> +#endif
>>
>> Did you build test this for ARM? The function ought to be unused,
>> as ...
>>
>>> @@ -12
Hi Jan,
Sorry for the late answer, I have been traveling the past 2 weeks.
On 30/09/2016 02:46, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.09.16 at 23:42, wrote:
+#else
+static void __init free_ebmalloc_unused_mem(void)
+{
+}
+#endif
Did you build test this for ARM? The function ought to be unused,
as ...
Hello Daniel,
On 05/10/2016 00:02, Daniel Kiper wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 03:46:54AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.09.16 at 23:42, wrote:
+#else
+static void __init free_ebmalloc_unused_mem(void)
+{
+}
+#endif
Did you build test this for ARM? The function ought to be unused,
as ...
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 03:46:54AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 29.09.16 at 23:42, wrote:
> > +#else
> > +static void __init free_ebmalloc_unused_mem(void)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +#endif
>
> Did you build test this for ARM? The function ought to be unused,
> as ...
>
> > @@ -1251,6 +1301,8 @@ voi
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 03:46:54AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 29.09.16 at 23:42, wrote:
> > +#else
> > +static void __init free_ebmalloc_unused_mem(void)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +#endif
>
> Did you build test this for ARM? The function ought to be unused,
> as ...
Nope.
> > @@ -1251,6 +1301,8
>>> On 29.09.16 at 23:42, wrote:
> +#else
> +static void __init free_ebmalloc_unused_mem(void)
> +{
> +}
> +#endif
Did you build test this for ARM? The function ought to be unused,
as ...
> @@ -1251,6 +1301,8 @@ void __init efi_init_memory(void)
> } *extra, *extra_head = NULL;
> #endif
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
